Abstract

Environmental and regulatory pressures have prompted original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to explore highly boosted internal combustion (IC) engines as a means to minimize toxic air pollutants and meet strict legislative targets. The exhaust gas turbocharger is a key technology used to achieve the boost pressures necessary for advanced engines of the future. Centrifugal compressors with vaneless diffusers have been widely implemented in turbochargers for IC engines, particularly passenger vehicles, primarily due to their compact size and ability to deliver high-pressure ratios over a wide range of flowrates. Methods to improve compressor efficiency near surge without reducing the surge margin have received considerable interest in the past. In many situations, changes to the impeller blade design and/or diffuser are limited by the need to meet the strict engine-rated power target. Such competing demands have encouraged designers to develop variable geometry compressors with the aim of improving near surge performance without sacrificing rated power performance. The on/off-type vaned diffuser is a variable geometry compressor capable of delivering a pressure ratio benefit near surge by utilizing a vaned diffuser rather than a vaneless diffuser. The vanes are retracted prior to the diffuser choking to form a vaneless diffuser in order to reach the engine-rated power condition. Diffuser vane-shaped clearances in the hub or the shroud end wall, termed side clearances, enable axial sliding variability of the vanes into and out of the diffuser passage. Unfortunately, the clearances manifest themselves as a discontinuity in the flow field which gives rise to an efficiency penalty. It is not yet clear how the side clearance geometry and position affect the compressor performance i.e., efficiency and stability. Hence, a numerical and experimental investigation was carried out to determine the impact of side clearance geometry and end wall position on compressor performance. It was found that a side clearance positioned at the shroud end wall reduced the surge margin of the investigated compressor for both types of clearance geometry considered. In contrast to this, a clearance positioned at the hub end wall improved the compressor surge margin but had the lowest efficiency benefit near surge. An experimentally validated Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model was used to inspect the flow field and to elucidate the reasons behind the changes in compressor performance.

References

1.
Tange
,
H.
,
Ikeya
,
N.
,
Takanashi
,
M.
, and
Hokari
,
T.
, “
Variable Geometry Diffuser of Turbocharger Compressor for Passenger Vehicles
,”
Proceedings of the SAE 2003 World Congress & Exhibition
,
Detroit, MI
,
Mar. 3–7
,
Paper No. 2003-01-0051.
2.
Karstadt
,
S.
,
Weiske
,
S.
, and
Münz
,
S.
,
2018
, “
Turbocharger with Variable Compressor Geometry—Another Contribution to Improved Fuel Economy by the Boosting System
,”
Proceedings of the 27th Aachen Colloquium Automobile and Engine Technology
,
Aachen, Germany
,
Oct. 8–10
, pp.
1191
1214
.
3.
Bailey
,
E. E.
,
1972
, “
Effect of Grooved Casing Treatment on the Flow Range Capability of a Single-Stage Axial-Flow Compressor
,”
NASA Technical Memorandum TMX-2459
,
Cleveland, OH
.
4.
Bareiß
,
S.
,
Vogt
,
D. M.
, and
Chebli
,
E.
,
2015
, “
Investigation of the Impact of Circumferential Grooves on Aerodynamic Centrifugal Compressor Performance
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2015: Turbine Technical Conference and Exhibition
,
Montreal, Canada
,
June 15–19
,
Paper No. GT2015-42211
.
5.
Harley
,
P.
,
Spence
,
S.
,
Filsinger
,
D.
,
Dietrich
,
M.
, and
Early
,
J.
,
2014
, “
Meanline Modeling of Inlet Recirculation in Automotive Turbocharger Centrifugal Compressors
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
137
(
1
), p.
011007
.
6.
Stuart
,
C.
,
Spence
,
S.
,
Filsinger
,
D.
,
Starke
,
A.
, and
Kim
,
S.
,
2017
, “
Characterizing the Influence of Impeller Exit Recirculation on Centrifugal Compressor Work Input
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
140
(
1
), p.
011005
.
7.
SAE
,
1995
, “Turbocharger Gas Stand Test Code,” J1826. PA.
8.
Wilcox
,
D. C.
,
1988
, “
Multiscale Model for Turbulent Flows
,”
AIAA J.
,
26
(
11
), pp.
1311
1320
.
9.
ANSYS
,
2017
,
ANSYS 17.2 CFX-Solver Theory Guide
,
ANSYS, Inc.
,
Canonsburg, PA
.
10.
Japikse
,
D.
,
1996
,
Centrifugal Compressor Design and Performance
,
Concepts NREC
,
White River Junction, VT
.
11.
Shum
,
Y. K. P.
,
Tan
,
C. S.
, and
Cumpsty
,
N. A.
,
2000
, “
Impeller-Diffuser Interaction in a Centrifugal Compressor
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
122
(
4
), pp.
777
786
.
12.
Greitzer
,
E. M.
,
1981
, “
The Stability of Pumping Systems—The 1980 Freeman Scholar Lecture
,”
J. Fluid. Eng.
,
103
(
2
), pp.
193
242
.
13.
Tamaki
,
H.
,
2008
, “
Effect of Piping Systems on Surge in Centrifugal Compressors
,”
J. Mech. Sci. Technol.
,
22
(
10
), pp.
1857
1863
.
14.
Hunziker
,
R.
, and
Gyarmathy
,
G.
,
1994
, “
The Operational Stability of a Centrifugal Compressor and Its Dependence on the Characteristics of the Subcomponents
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
116
(
2
), pp.
250
259
.
15.
Galloway
,
L.
,
Spence
,
S.
,
Kim
,
S.
,
Rusch
,
D.
,
Vogel
,
K.
, and
Hunziker
,
R.
,
2017
, “
An Investigation of the Stability Enhancement of a Centrifugal Compressor Stage Using a Porous Throat Diffuser
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
140
(
1
), p.
011008
.
16.
Galloway
,
L.
,
Rusch
,
D.
,
Spence
,
S.
,
Vogel
,
K.
,
Hunziker
,
R.
, and
Kim
,
S.
,
2018
, “
An Investigation of Centrifugal Compressor Stability Enhancement Using a Novel Vaned Diffuser Recirculation Technique
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
140
(
12
), p.
121009
.
You do not currently have access to this content.