Impeller recirculation is a loss which has long been considered in one-dimensional (1D) modeling; however, the full extent of its impact on stage performance has not been analyzed. Recirculation has traditionally been considered purely as a parasitic (or external) loss, i.e., one which absorbs work but does not contribute to total pressure rise across the stage. Having extensively analyzed the impact of recirculation on the impeller exit flow field, it was possible to show that it has far-reaching consequences beyond that of increasing total temperature. The overall aim of this package of work is to apply a much more physical treatment to the impact of impeller exit recirculation (and the aerodynamic blockage associated with it) and hence realize an improvement in the 1D stage performance prediction of a number of turbocharger centrifugal compressors. The factors influencing the presence and extent of this recirculation are numerous, requiring detailed investigations to successfully understand its sources and to characterize its extent. A combination of validated three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) data and gas stand test data for six automotive turbocharger compressor stages was employed to achieve this aim. In order to capture the variation of the blockage presented to the flow with both geometry and operating condition, an approach involving the impeller outlet to inlet area ratio and a novel flow coefficient term were employed. The resulting data permitted the generation of a single equation to represent the impeller exit blockage levels for the entire operating map of all the six compressor stages under investigation. With an understanding of the extent of the region of recirculating flow realized and the key drivers leading to its creation identified, it was necessary to comprehend how the resulting blockage influenced compressor performance. Consideration was given to the impact on impeller work input through modification of the impeller exit velocity triangle, incorporating the introduction of the concept of an “aerodynamic meanline” to account for the reduction in the size of the active flow region due to the presence of blockage. The sensitivity of the stage to this change was then related back to the level of backsweep applied to the impeller. As a result of this analysis, the improvement in the 1D performance prediction of the six compressor stages is demonstrated. In addition, a number of design recommendations are presented to ensure that the detrimental effects associated with the presence of impeller exit recirculation can be minimized.

References

1.
Harley
,
P.
,
Spence
,
S. W.
,
Filsinger
,
D.
,
Dietrich
,
M.
, and
Early
,
J.
,
2015
, “
Meanline Modeling of Inlet Recirculation in Automotive Turbocharger Centrifugal Compressors
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
137
(
1
), p. 011007.
2.
Stuart
,
C.
,
Spence
,
S. W.
,
Filsinger
,
D.
,
Starke
,
A.
,
Kim
,
S.
, and
Harley
,
P.
,
2015
, “
An Evaluation of Vaneless Diffuser Modelling Methods as a Means of Improving the Off-Design Performance Prediction of Centrifugal Compressors
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2015-42657.
3.
Stuart
,
C.
,
Spence
,
S. W.
,
Filsinger
,
D.
,
Starke
,
A.
, and
Kim
,
S.
,
2015
, “
A 1-D Vaneless Diffuser Model Accounting for the Effects of Spanwise Flow Stratification
,” International Gas Turbine Congress (
IGTC
), Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 15–20, pp. 485–494. http://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/files/40347019/vaneless.pdf
4.
Aungier
,
R. H.
,
2000
,
Centrifugal Compressors: A Strategy for Aerodynamic Design and Analysis
,
ASME Press
,
New York
.
5.
Oh
,
H.
,
Yoon
,
E. S.
, and
Chung
,
M. K.
,
1997
, “
An Optimum Set of Loss Models for Performance Prediction of Centrifugal Compressors
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A
,
211
(
4
), pp.
331
338
.
6.
Rodgers
,
C.
,
1961
, “
Influence of Impeller and Diffuser Characteristics and Matching on Radial Compressor Performance
,”
SAE
Paper No. 610159.
7.
Coppage
,
J. E.
,
Dallenbach
,
F.
,
Eichenberger
,
J. P.
,
Hlvaka
,
G. E.
,
Knoerschild
,
E. M.
, and
Vanke
,
N.
,
1956
, “
Study of Supersonic Radial Compressors for Refrigeration and Pressurisation Systems
,” AiResearch Manufacturing Company, Dayton, OH, Report No.
WADC TR 55-257
.http://contrails.iit.edu/reports/3689
8.
Stern
,
F.
,
Wilson
,
R. V.
,
Coleman
,
E. W.
, and
Paterson
,
E. G.
,
2001
, “
Comprehensive Approach to Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations—Part 1: Methodology and Procedures
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
123
(
4
), pp.
793
802
.
9.
Lüdtke
,
K. H.
,
2004
,
Process Centrifugal Compressors: Basics, Function, Operation, Design, Application
,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin
.
10.
Weber
,
C. R.
, and
Koronowski
,
M. E.
,
1986
, “
Meanline Performance Prediction of Volutes in Centrifugal Compressors
,”
ASME
Paper No. 86-GT-216.
11.
Whitfield
,
A.
,
1974
, “
Slip Factor of a Centrifugal Compressor and Its Variation With Flow Rate
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.
,
188
(1), pp.
415
421
.
12.
ANSYS
, 2013, “
Release 15.0, BladeGen On-Line Help, Surface Areas
,” ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
13.
SAE
,
1995
, “
Turbocharger Gas Stand Test Code
,” Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, Standard No.
J1826_199503
.http://standards.sae.org/j1826_199503/
14.
ABB
,
2011
, “
FS4000 Swirl Flowmeter Data Sheet
,” ABB Process Automation, Gloucestershire, UK.
15.
Druck
,
2007
, “
Druck PMP 4000 Series Specifications
,” Druck Limited, Leicester, UK, accessed Oct. 12, 2017, http://mechatec.co.kr/upload/pty3/1192375667_0.pdf
16.
BSI,
1984
, “
Specification for Industrial Platinum Resistance Thermometer Sensors
,” British Standards Institution, London, Standard No.
BS1904
.https://shop.bsigroup.com/ProductDetail/?pid=000000000000126916
17.
Baines
,
N.
,
Wygant
,
K. D.
, and
Dris
,
A.
,
2010
, “
The Analysis of Heat Transfer in Automotive Turbochargers
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
132
(
4
), p.
042301
.
18.
Sirakov
,
B.
, and
Casey
,
M.
,
2011
, “
Evaluation of Heat Transfer Effects on Turbocharger Performance
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2011-45887.
19.
Tamaki
,
H.
, and
Yamaguchi
,
S.
,
2007
, “
The Experimental Study of Matching Between Centrifugal Compressor Impellers and Vaneless Diffusers for Turbochargers
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2007-28300.
20.
Tamaki
,
H.
,
2009
, “
Experimental Study on Surge Inception in a Centrifugal Compressor
,”
Int. J. Fluid Mach. Syst.
,
2
(
4
), pp. 409–417.https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ijfms/2/4/2_4_409/_pdf
21.
Qiu
,
X.
,
Japikse
,
D.
,
Zhao
,
J.
, and
Anderson
,
M. R.
,
2011
, “
Analysis and Validation of a Unified Slip Factor Model for Impellers at Design and Off-Design Conditions
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
133
(
4
), p.
041018
.
22.
Galvas
,
M. R.
,
1973
, “Fortran Program for Predicting Off-Design Performance of Centrifugal Compressors,” NASA Lewis Research Centre, Cleveland, OH, Technical Report No.
TN-D-7487
.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19740001912.pdf
23.
Jansen
,
W.
,
1967
, “
A Method for Calculating the Flow in a Centrifugal Impeller When Entropy Gradients Are Present
,”
Royal Society Conference on Internal Aerodynamics (Turbomachinery)
, Cambridge, UK, July 19–21, pp.
133
146
.
24.
Yang
,
M.
,
Zheng
,
X.
,
Zhang
,
Y.
,
Bamba
,
T.
,
Tamaki
,
H.
,
Huenteler
,
J.
, and
Li
,
Z.
,
2010
, “
Stability Improvement of High-Pressure-Ratio Turbocharger Compressor by Asymmetric Flow Control: Part I—Non Axisymmetric Flow in Centrifugal Compressor
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2010-22581.
25.
Van den Braembussche
,
R. A.
,
2014
, “
Centrifugal Compressors Analysis and Design
” (VKI Course Note No. 192), von Karman Institute, Sint-Genesius-Rode, Belgium.
You do not currently have access to this content.