An optimization has been performed on a well-proven radial compressor design known as the SRV4 impeller (the Krain impeller), which has been extensively tested in the past, using the autoopti tool developed at DLR's Institute of Propulsion Technology. This tool has shown its capability in several tasks, mainly for axial compressor and fan design as well as for turbine design. The optimization package autoopti was applied to the redesign and optimization of a radial compressor stage with a vaneless diffusor. This optimization was performed for the SRV4 compressor geometry without fillets using a relatively coarse structured mesh in combination with wall functions. The impeller geometry deduced by the optimization had to be slightly modified due to manufacturing constraints. In order to filter out the improvements of the new so-called SRV5 radial compressor design, two work packages were conducted: The first one was the manufacturing of the new impeller and its installation on a test rig to investigate the complex flow inside the machine. The aim was, first of all, the evaluation of a classical performance map and the efficiency chart achieved by the new compressor design. The efficiencies realized in the performance chart were enhanced by nearly 1.5%. A 5% higher maximum mass flow rate was measured in agreement with the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations during the design process. The second work package comprises the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis. The numerical investigations were conducted with the exact geometries of both the baseline SRV4 as well as the optimized SRV5 impeller including the exact fillet geometries. To enhance the prediction accuracy of pressure ratio and impeller efficiency, the geometries were discretized by high-resolution meshes of approximately 5 × 106 cells. For the blade walls as well as for the hub region, the mesh resolution allows a low-Reynolds approach in order to get high-quality results. The comparison of the numerical predictions and the experimental results shows a very good agreement and confirms the improvement of the compressor performance using the optimization tool autoopti.

References

1.
Eisenlohr
,
G.
,
Krain
,
H.
,
Richter
,
F. A.
, and
Tiede
,
V.
,
2002
, “
Investigations of the Flow Through a High Pressure Ratio Centrifugal Impeller
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT-2002-30394.
2.
Krain
,
H.
, and
Hoffmann
,
B.
,
2008
, “
Flow Study of a Redesigned High Pressure Ratio Centrifugal Compressor
,”
AIAA J.
,
24
(
5
), pp.
1
7
.
3.
Siller
,
U.
,
Voß
,
C.
, and
Nicke
,
E.
,
2009
, “
Automated Multidisciplinary Optimization of a Transonic Axial Compressor
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2009-863.
4.
Siller
,
U.
, and
Aulich
,
M.
,
2010
, “
Multidisciplinary 3D-Optimization of a Fan Stage Performance Map With Consideration of the Static and Dynamic Rotor Mechanics
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2010-22792.
5.
Raitor
,
T.
,
Reutter
,
O.
,
Aulich
,
M.
, and
Nicke
,
E.
,
2013
, “
Aerodynamic Design Studies of a Transonic Centrifugal Compressor Impeller Based on Automatic 3D-CFD Optimization
,”
10th European Turbomachinery Conference
, Lappeenranta, Finland, Apr. 15–19, Paper No. A082.
6.
Voß
,
C.
,
Aulich
,
M.
, and
Raitor
,
T.
,
2014
, “
Metamodel Assisted Aeromechanical Optimization of a Transonic Centrifugal Compressor
,” ISROMAC 15, Honolulu, HI, Feb. 24–28.
7.
Voges
,
M.
,
Beversdorff
,
M.
,
Willert
,
C.
, and
Krain
,
H.
,
2006
, “
Application of Particle Image Velocimetry to a Transonic Centrifugal Compressor
,”
13th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics
, Lisbon, Portugal, June 26–29, Paper No. 1073.
8.
Sauer
,
M.
, and
Weber
,
A.
,
2015
, “
PyMesh—Meshing Package for Turbomachinery CFD Structured Multiblock Grids. User's Manual
,” Numerical Methods Group, Institute of Propulsion Technology, DLR, Köln, Germany, Report No. DLR IB-325-08-14, pp.
1
118
.
9.
Becker
,
K.
,
Heitkamp
,
K.
, and
Kügeler
,
E.
,
2010
, “
Recent Progress in a Hybrid-Grid CFD Solver for Turbomachinery Flows
,”
Fifth European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics
(
ECCOMAS CFD 2010
), Lisbon, Portugal, June 14–17.
10.
Röber
,
T.
,
Kožulović
,
D.
,
Kügeler
,
E.
, and
Nürnberger
,
D.
,
2005
, “
Appropriate Turbulence Modelling for Turbomachinery Flows Using a Two-Equation Turbulence Model
,”
New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics V
(Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, Vol. 92), H.-J. Rath, C. Holze, H.-J. Heinemann, R. Henke, and H. Hönlinger, eds., Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp.
446
454
.
11.
Franke
,
M.
,
Röber
,
T.
,
Kügeler
,
E.
, and
Ashcroft
,
G.
,
2010
, “
Turbulence Treatment in Steady and Unsteady Turbomachinery Flows
,”
Fifth European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics
(
ECCOMAS CFD 2010
), Lisbon, Portugal, June 14–17.
12.
Wu
,
C.-H.
,
1952
, “
A General Theory of Three-Dimensional Flow in Subsonic and Supersonic Turbomachines of Axial-, Radial- and Mixed-Flow Types
,” National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Lewis Flight Propulsion Laboratory, Cleveland, OH, Technical Report No.
NACA-TN-2604
.
You do not currently have access to this content.