Laminar separation and transition phenomena were investigated experimentally in the wake-disturbed flow over a 2.4 m long flat plate. A controlled diffusion pressure distribution, representative of that on a compressor blade, was imposed but with sufficiently strong loading to cause laminar separation. Boundary layer velocity traverses were performed at several longitudinal stations. Wakes were generated upstream by a single rod, parallel to the leading edge, attached to a rotating disk mounted flush in the sidewall of the working section. Data are presented in the form of velocity traces and contours of velocity and turbulent intermittency. The results highlight the interaction between the incoming wake and the natural boundary layer, which features a long and thin laminar separation bubble; they demonstrate that wind tunnel experiments provide a good representation of boundary layer behavior under wake disturbances on turbomachinery blading. The calmed region behind the disturbance is a feature that is even stronger behind a wake interaction than behind a triggered turbulent spot. Intermittency values for the undisturbed flow in the separation bubble reattachment region are well represented by Narasimha’s universal intermittency distribution, lending support to the use of intermittency-based predictive routines in calculations of blade boundary layers.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
laminar flow, external flows, bubbles, rotational flow, laminar to turbulent transitions, flow instability, wakes, boundary layers, flow separation, wind tunnels
Topics:
Boundary layers, Bubbles, Flow (Dynamics), Separation (Technology), Turbulence, Wakes, Blades, Wind tunnels, Flat plates
1.
Luo
,
J.
, and
Lakshminarayana
,
B.
,
1997
, “
Numerical Simulation of Turbine Blade Boundary Layer and Heat Transfer and Assessment of Turbulence Models
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
119
, pp.
794
–
801
.
1.
Halstead
,
D. E.
,
Wisler
,
D. C.
,
Okiishi
,
T. H.
,
Walker
,
G. J.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
, and
Shin
,
H. W.
,
1997
, “
Boundary Layer Development in Axial Compressors and Turbines: Part 1–4
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
119
(
1
), pp.
114
–
127
;
2.
ibid., pp.
128
–
139
;
3.
119
(
2
), pp.
234
–
246
;
4.
119
(
3
), pp.
426
–
444
.
1.
Mayle
,
R. E.
,
1991
, “
The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
113
, pp.
509
–
537
(1991 IGTI Scholar Lecture).
2.
Hughes
,
J. D.
, and
Walker
,
G. J.
,
2001
, “
Natural Transition Phenomena on an Axial Compressor Blade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
123
, pp.
392
–
401
.
3.
D’Ovidio, A., Harkins, J. A., and Gostelow, J. P., 2001, “Interaction Between a Laminar Separation Bubble and a Turbulent Spot Under a Strong Adverse Pressure Gradient,” Proc. of 4th European Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics, ATI-CST-077/1.
4.
D’Ovidio, A., Harkins, J. A., and Gostelow, J. P., 2001, “Turbulent Spot in Strong Adverse Pressure Gradients, Part I: Spot Behavior,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0194.
5.
D’Ovidio, A., Harkins, J. A., and Gostelow, J. P., 2001, “Turbulent Spot in Strong Adverse Pressure Gradients. Part II: Spot Propagation and Spreading Rate,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0406.
6.
Gostelow, J. P., Hodson, H. P., and Walker, G. J., 1999, “Comparisons Between Triggered Turbulent Spots and Unsteady Transition Phenomena on Compressor and Turbine Blading,” Laminar-Turbulent Transition, Proc. IUTAM Symposium, H. F. Fasel and W. S. Saric, eds., Sedona, AZ, pp. 365–370.
7.
Solomon
,
W. J.
,
Walker
,
G. J.
, and
Gostelow
,
J. P.
,
1996
, “
Transition Length Prediction for Flows With Rapidly Changing Pressure Gradients
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
118
, pp.
744
–
751
.
8.
Schubauer, G. B., and Klebanoff, P. S., 1955, “Contributions on the Mechanics of Boundary Layer Transition,” NACA Report 1289.
9.
Gostelow
,
J. P.
,
Walker
,
G. J.
,
Solomon
,
W. J.
,
Hong
,
G.
, and
Melwani
,
N.
,
1997
, “
Investigation on the Calmed Region Behind a Turbulent Spot
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
119
, pp.
802
–
809
.
10.
Walker
,
G. J.
,
1989
, “
Transitional Flow on Axial Turbomachine Blading
,”
AIAA J.
,
27
(
5
), pp.
595
–
602
.
11.
Lou, W., and Hourmouziadis, J., 2000, “Separation Bubbles Under Steady and Periodic-Unsteady Main Flow Conditions,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-0270.
12.
Narasimha
,
R.
,
1957
, “
On the Distribution of Intermittency in the Transition Region of the Boundary Layer
,”
J. Aeronaut. Sci.
,
24
, pp.
711
–
712
.
13.
Gostelow
,
J. P.
,
Blunden
,
A. R.
, and
Walker
,
G. J.
,
1994
, “
Effects of Free-Stream Turbulence and Adverse Pressure Gradients on Boundary Layer Transition
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
116
, pp.
392
–
404
.
14.
Falco, R. E., and Grendrich, C. P., 1990, “The Turbulence Burst Detection Algorithm of Z. Zaric,” Near-Wall Turbulence, 1988 Zoltan Zaric Memorial Conference, Hemisphere, New York, Kline, S. J., and Afgan, N. H., eds., pp. 911–931.
15.
Malkiel
,
E.
, and
Mayle
,
R. E.
,
1996
, “
Transition in a Separation Bubble
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
118
, pp.
752
–
759
.
16.
Sanz, W., and Platzer, M. F., 1996, “On the Navier-Stokes Calculation of Separation Bubbles,” ASME Paper 96-GT-487.
Copyright © 2005
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.