Results of heat transfer measurements on a typical turbine blade and a vane in a linear cascade have been obtained using the naphthalene sublimation technique. The tests on the vane were performed at the nominal flow angle, whereas for the turbine blade an off-design angle was chosen to study the influence of a separation bubble on the heat transfer. The exit Mach number was varied from M2 = 0.2 to 0.4 and the exit Reynolds number ranged from Re2 = 300,000 to 700,000. Comparisons with numerical codes have been conducted. The measurements were performed in a linear test facility containing five airfoils. Two tailboards and two bypass vanes allowed us to achieve a good periodicity of the flow. The aerodynamic flow conditions were measured using pressure taps and Laser-Two-Focus (L2F) anemometry. About 40 static pressure taps gave a precise Mach number distribution over the suction and the pressure side of the airfoil. L2F measurements were used to determine the downstream flow angles. The heat transfer coefficient was measured using the naphthalene sublimation technique. This method is based on the heat and mass transfer analogy for incompressible flow. A 0.5 mm thin naphthalene layer was applied to the middle airfoil and exposed to the flow for about 45 minutes. The sublimation was then measured in over 500 points on the airfoil, which allowed a high resolution of the heat transfer coefficient. Due to its high resolution, the sublimation technique shows the presence of and the precise location of the laminar-to-turbulent transition point and the separation bubble. The measurements on the vane were compared with two separate two-dimensional boundary layer programs, which were TEXSTAN (Texas University) and TEN (Sussex University). The programs incorporate the k–epsilon turbulence model with several different formulations. The laminar–turbulent transition was predicted quite well with TEN, which slightly damps out the production of turbulent kinetic energy in order to ensure a smooth transition zone. In the case of the blade, the naphthalene sublimation technique was able to predict the size and the location of the separation bubble as well as the reattachment with a very high precision.

1.
Bellows
W. J.
, and
Mayle
R. E.
,
1986
, “
Heat Transfer Downstream of a Leading Edge Separation Bubble
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
108
, pp.
131
136
.
2.
Berg, H. P., Hennecke, D. K., Elfert, M., and Hein, O., 1991, “The Effect of Rotation on Local Coolant Side Flow and Heat Transfer in Turbine Blades,” Proceedings 10th ISABE, Nottingham, United Kingdom, Sept. 1–6.
3.
Berg, H. P., 1991, “Experimentelle Bestimmung des o¨rtlichen inneren Wa¨rmeu¨bergangs von Turbinenleit- und Laufschaufeln mit Hilfe der Analogie zwischen Wa¨rme- und Stoffu¨bergang,” Dissertation No. 17, T. H. Darmstadt, Institut fu¨r Flugantriebe, Germany.
4.
Bo¨lcs
A.
, and
Sari
O.
,
1988
, “
Influence of Deposit on the Flow in a Turbine Cascade
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
110
, pp.
512
519
.
5.
Chen
P. H.
, and
Goldstein
R. J.
,
1992
, “
Convective Transport Phenomena on the Suction Surface of a Turbine Blade Including the Influence of Secondary Flows Near the Endwall
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
114
, pp.
776
787
.
6.
Chien
K. Y.
,
1982
, “
Predictions of Channel and Boundary Layer Flows With a Low Reynolds Number Turbulence Model
,
AIAA J.
, Vol.
20
, pp.
33
38
.
7.
Crawford, M. E., and Kays, W. M., 1976, “STAN5, a Program for Numerical Computation of Two Dimensional Internal and External Boundary Layer Flow,” NASA CR-2742.
8.
Crawford, M. E., 1986, “Simulation Codes for Calculation of the Heat Transfer to Convectively Cooled Turbine Blades,” Convective Heat Transfer & Film Cooling in Turbomachinery, VKI—LS—1986-06.
9.
Eckert, E. R. G., and Goldstein, R. J., 1976, Measurement in Heat Transfer, ISBN 0-07-018926-9.
10.
Harasgama, S. P., Tarada, F. H., Baumann, R., Crawford, M. E., and Neelakantan, X. X., 1993, “Calculation of Heat Transfer to Turbine Blading Using Two-Dimensional Boundary Layer Methods,” ASME Paper No. 93-GT-79.
11.
Hodson
H. P.
, and
Dominy
R. G.
,
1987
, “
Three-Dimensional Flow in a Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade at Its Design Condition
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
109
, pp.
201
209
.
12.
Keumnam
C.
,
Thomas
F.
,
Irvine
, and
Jacob
K.
,
1992
, “
Measurement of the Diffusion Coefficient of Naphthalene Into Air
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
, Vol.
35
No.
4
, pp.
957
966
.
13.
Lam, C. K. G., and Bremhorst K., 1981, “A Modified Form of the k–Epsilion Model for Predicting Wall Turbulence,” J. Heat Fluid Flow, No. 4, pp. 331–345.
14.
Presser
J.
,
1968
, “
Experimentelle Pru¨fung der Analogie zwischen konvektiver Wa¨rme- und Stoffu¨bertragung bei nicht abgelo¨ster Stro¨mung
,”
Wa¨rme- und Stoffu¨bertragung
, Vol.
1
, pp.
225
236
.
15.
Schmidt
R.
, and
Patankar
S. V.
,
1991
, “
Simulating Boundary Layer Transition With Low Reynolds Number k–Epsilon Models: Part 2 An Approach to Improve the Predictions
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
113
, pp.
18
26
.
16.
Tarada, F., 1990, “Prediction of Rough-Wall Boundary Layers Using a Low Reynolds Number k–ε Model,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, Vol. 11, No. 4, Dec.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.