Surface topography of sealing interface is a key factor affecting sealing performance. In industry, it has always been desirable to optimize the performance of static seals by optimizing the surface topography. The evolution of leak channels and the quantitative effects of surface topography on leak rates are expected to be clarified. This paper proposes a novel approach to calculate leak channels and leak rates between sealing surfaces for specific surface topographies, based on three-dimensional (3D) finite-element contact analysis. First, a macromechanical analysis of the entire sealing structure is conducted to calculate the interfacial pressure. Second, the surface topography data are measured and processed. Third, the interfacial pressure is used as the boundary condition applied on the microscale 3D finite-element contact model, which is built based on the specific surface topography. Fourth, the geometrical models of leak channels are extracted from the finite-element contact model, and the leak rates are calculated using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method. The proposed approach was applied to a hollow bolt-sealing structure. Finally, experimental results verified the accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed approach, which can provide valuable information for optimizing surface processing techniques, surface topography, and static seal performance.

References

1.
Bottiglione
,
F.
,
Carbone
,
G.
,
Mangialardi
,
L.
, and
Mantriota
,
G.
,
2009
, “
Leakage Mechanism in Flat Seals
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
,
106
(
10
), p.
104902
.
2.
Greenwood
,
J. A.
, and
Williamson
,
J. B. P.
,
1966
, “
Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A
,
295
(
1442
), pp.
300
319
.
3.
Arghavani
,
J.
,
Derenne
,
M.
, and
Marchand
,
L.
,
2003
, “
Effect of Surface Characteristics on Compressive Stress and Leakage Rate in Gasketed Flanged Joints
,”
Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.
,
21
(
10–11
), pp.
713
732
.
4.
Matsuzaki
,
Y.
, and
Kazamaki
,
T.
,
1988
, “
Effect of Surface Roughness on Compressive Stress of Static Seals
,”
JSME Int. J. Ser. III
,
31
(
1
), pp.
99
106
.
5.
Matsuzaki
,
Y.
,
Hosokawa
,
K.
, and
Funabashi
,
K.
,
1992
, “
Effect of Surface Roughness on Contact Pressure of Static Seals (Sealing Characteristics of Knife-Edge Seals)
,”
JSME Int. J. Ser. III
,
35
(
3
), pp.
470
476
.
6.
Yanagisawa
,
T.
,
Sanada
,
M.
,
Koga
,
T.
, and
Hirabayashi
,
H.
,
1991
, “
The Influence of Designing Factors on the Sealing Performance of C-Seal
,” SAE Technical Paper No. 0148-7191.
7.
Lorenz
,
B.
, and
Persson
,
B. N. J.
,
2010
, “
On the Dependence of the Leak Rate of Seals on the Skewness of the Surface Height Probability Distribution
,”
Europhys. Lett.
,
90
(
3
), p.
38002
.
8.
Bottiglione
,
F.
,
Carbone
,
G.
, and
Mantriota
,
G.
,
2009
, “
Fluid Leakage in Seals: An Approach Based on Percolation Theory
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
42
(
5
), pp.
731
737
.
9.
Persson
,
B. N. J.
,
2001
, “
Theory of Rubber Friction and Contact Mechanics
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
,
115
(
8
), pp.
3840
3861
.
10.
Persson
,
B. N. J.
,
2001
, “
Elastoplastic Contact Between Randomly Rough Surfaces
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
,
87
(
11
), p.
116101
.
11.
Persson
,
B. N. J.
, and
Yang
,
C.
,
2008
, “
Theory of the Leak-Rate of Seals
,”
J. Phys. Condens. Matter.
,
20
(
31
), p.
315011
.
12.
Geoffroy
,
S.
, and
Prat
,
M.
,
2004
, “
On the Leak Through a Spiral-Groove Metallic Static Ring Gasket
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
126
(
1
), pp.
48
54
.
13.
Robbe-Valloire
,
F.
, and
Prat
,
M.
,
2008
, “
A Model for Face-Turned Surface Microgeometry: Application to the Analysis of Metallic Static Seals
,”
Wear
,
264
(
11
), pp.
980
989
.
14.
Fahl
,
C. F.
,
1982
, “
Motif Combination—A New Approach to Surface Profile Analysis
,”
Wear
,
83
(
1
), pp.
165
179
.
15.
Pérez-Ràfols
,
F.
,
Larsson
,
R.
, and
Almqvist
,
A.
,
2016
, “
Modelling of Leakage on Metal-to-Metal Seals
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
94
, pp.
421
427
.
16.
Stanley
,
H. M.
, and
Kato
,
T.
,
1997
, “
An FFT-Based Method for Rough Surface Contact
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
119
(
3
), pp.
481
485
.
17.
Abid
,
M.
, and
Nash
,
D. H.
,
2004
, “
A Parametric Study of Metal-to-Metal Contact Flanges With Optimised Geometry for Safe Stress and No-Leak Conditions
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
81
(
1
), pp.
67
74
.
18.
Abid
,
M.
, and
Nash
,
D. H.
,
2003
, “
Comparative Study of the Behaviour of Conventional Gasketed and Compact Non-Gasketed Flanged Pipe Joints Under Bolt Up and Operating Conditions
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
80
(
12
), pp.
831
841
.
19.
Krishna
,
M. M.
,
Shunmugam
,
M. S.
, and
Prasad
,
N. S.
,
2007
, “
A Study on the Sealing Performance of Bolted Flange Joints With Gaskets Using Finite Element Analysis
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
84
(
6
), pp.
349
357
.
20.
Lin
,
T.
,
Li
,
R.
,
Long
,
H.
, and
Ou
,
H.
,
2006
, “
Three-Dimensional Transient Sealing Analysis of the Bolted Flange Connections of Reactor Pressure Vessel
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
236
(
24
), pp.
2599
2607
.
21.
Hyun
,
S.
,
Pei
,
L.
,
Molinari
,
J. F.
, and
Robbins
,
M. O.
,
2004
, “
Finite-Element Analysis of Contact Between Elastic Self-Affine Surfaces
,”
Phys. Rev. E.
,
70
(
2
), p.
026117
.
22.
Hyun
,
S.
, and
Robbins
,
M. O.
,
2007
, “
Elastic Contact Between Rough Surfaces: Effect of Roughness at Large and Small Wavelengths
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
40
(
10
), pp.
1413
1422
.
23.
Megalingam
,
A.
, and
Mayuram
,
M. M.
,
2012
, “
Comparative Contact Analysis Study of Finite Element Method Based Deterministic, Simplified Multi-Asperity and Modified Statistical Contact Models
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
134
(
1
), p.
014503
.
24.
Paggi
,
M.
, and
Zavarise
,
G.
,
2011
, “
Contact Mechanics of Microscopically Rough Surfaces With Graded Elasticity
,”
Eur. J. Mech. A Solid
,
30
(
5
), pp.
696
704
.
25.
Walter
,
C.
, and
Mitterer
,
C.
,
2009
, “
3D Versus 2D Finite Element Simulation of the Effect of Surface Roughness on Nanoindentation of Hard Coatings
,”
Surf. Coat. Technol.
,
203
(
20
), pp.
3286
3290
.
26.
Yastrebov
,
V. A.
,
Durand
,
J.
,
Proudhon
,
H.
, and
Cailletaud
,
G.
,
2011
, “
Rough Surface Contact Analysis by Means of the Finite Element Method and of a New Reduced Model
,”
C. R. Mec.
,
339
(
7
), pp.
473
490
.
27.
Bryant
,
M. J.
,
Evans
,
H. P.
, and
Snidle
,
R. W.
,
2012
, “
Plastic Deformation in Rough Surface Line Contacts: A Finite Element Study
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
46
(
1
), pp.
269
278
.
28.
Poulios
,
K.
, and
Klit
,
P.
,
2013
, “
Implementation and Applications of a Finite-Element Model for the Contact Between Rough Surfaces
,”
Wear
,
303
(
1
), pp.
1
8
.
29.
Fu
,
S.
,
Muralikrishnan
,
B.
, and
Raja
,
J.
,
2003
, “
Engineering Surface Analysis With Different Wavelet Bases
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
125
(
4
), pp.
844
852
.
30.
Persson
,
B. N. J.
,
2010
, “
Fluid Dynamics at the Interface Between Contacting Elastic Solids With Randomly Rough Surfaces
,”
J. Phys. Condens. Matter.
,
22
(
26
), p.
265004
.
31.
Marie
,
C.
, and
Lasseux
,
D.
,
2006
, “
Experimental Leak-Rate Measurement Through a Static Metal Seal
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
129
(
6
), pp.
799
805
.
You do not currently have access to this content.