Abstract

In order to ensure the integrity of structures such as gas turbines and nuclear power plants, the materials used should have excellent toughness. Especially in the case of nuclear piping materials applied to leak before break (LBB) design, high toughness materials are used to meet the stringent fracture toughness criteria and integrity must be verified through static J–R curve testing using the compliance method, one of the measurement techniques for fracture toughness. The measured and estimated values for the crack extension length during the test should also match, within a certain tolerance. However, in the case of materials with high toughness, rotation of the specimen becomes significant, because the test is performed until the crack open displacement (COD) is relatively large to ensure sufficient crack extension. In this case, it is not easy to satisfy these conditions due to the rotational effect on the specimen. Even though ASTM E1820 suggests a method for correcting the crack length for the rotational effect on these specimens, it has been found that there are substantial differences for high toughness materials. To resolve this problem, a new crack length correction formula considering a large rotation effect is proposed. Through analysis of the data from J–R curve testing with this proposed method, it is confirmed that the accuracy of crack extension length estimation is improved compared to the existing method. The proposed method can well explain the variation of crack extension length due to rotation and is suitable as a correction equation for rotation of compact tension specimens.

References

1.
Clarke
,
G.
,
Andrews
,
W.
,
Paris
,
P.
, and
Schmidt
,
D.
,
1976
, “Single Specimen Tests for JIC Determination,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No.
ASTM STP 590
, pp.
27
42
.10.1520/STP33937S
2.
Joyce
,
J. A.
, and
Gudas
,
J.
,
1979
, “Computer Interactive JIC of Testing Navy Alloys,” Elastic-Plastic Fracture, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No.
ASTM STP 668
, pp.
451
468
.10.1520/STP35843S
3.
Joyce
,
J. A.
,
Ernst
,
H.
, and
Paris
,
P. C.
,
1980
, “Direct Evaluation of J-Resistance Curves from Load Displacement Records,” Fracture Mechanics, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No.
ASTM STP 700
, pp.
222
236
.10.1520/STP36973S
4.
Landes
,
J. D.
,
Walker
,
H.
, and
Clarke
,
G. A.
,
1979
, “Evaluation of Estimation Procedures Used in J-Integral Testing,” Elastic-Plastic Fracture, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No.
ASTM STP 668
, pp.
266
287
.10.1520/STP35835S
5.
Dodds
,
R. H.
,
Anderson
,
T. L.
, and
Kirk
,
M. T.
,
1991
, “
A Framework to Correlate a/W Ratio Effects on Elastic Plastic Fracture Toughness (Jc)
,”
Int. J. Fract.
,
48
(
1
), pp.
1
22
.10.1007/BF00012499
6.
Zhu
,
X.-K.
, and
Leis
,
B. N.
,
2006
, “
Application of Constraint Corrected J-R Curves to Fracture Analysis of Pipelines
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
128
(
4
), pp.
581
589
.10.1115/1.2349571
7.
Chao
,
Y. J.
, and
Zhu
,
X. K.
,
2000
, “
Constraint-Modified J-R Curves and Its Applications to Ductile Crack Growth
,”
Int. J. Fract.
,
106
(
2
), pp.
135
160
.10.1023/A:1007638400006
8.
Zhu
,
X.-K.
, and
Joyce
,
J. A.
,
2012
, “
Review of Fracture Toughness (G, K, CTOD, CTOA) Testing and Standardization
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
,
85
, pp.
1
46
.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.02.001
9.
Lee
,
J. B.
, and
Choi
,
Y. H.
,
1999
, “
Application of LBB to High Energy Pipings of a Pressurized Water Reactor in Korea
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
190
(
1–2
), pp.
191
195
.10.1016/S0029-5493(98)00310-0
10.
ASTM,
2018
, “Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No.
ASTM E1820-18a
.10.1520/E1820-18A
11.
Loss
,
F. J.
,
1978
, “Structural Integrity of Water Reactor Pressure Boundary Components: Progress Report Ending 30 November 1977,” NRL, Washington, DC, Report No.
3782
.https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6160366
12.
Bao
,
C.
, and
Cai
,
L.
,
2011
, “
Investigation on Compliance Rotation Correction for Compact Tensile Specimen in Unloading Compliance Method
,”
Acta Mech. Solida Sin.
,
24
(
2
), pp.
144
152
.10.1016/S0894-9166(11)60016-5
13.
Cai
,
L. X.
,
Jin
,
L.
, and
Bao
,
C.
,
2008
, “
On Fracture Mechanics Testing Technique Based on Compliance of Specimens
,”
Key Eng. Mater.
,
385–387
, pp.
293
296
.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.385-387.293
14.
Fisher
,
D. M.
, and
Buzzard
,
R. J.
,
1980
, “Experimental Compliance Calibration of the Compact Fracture Toughness Specimen,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Washington, DC, Report No.
81665
.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19810007975
15.
Ernst
,
H. A.
,
Paris
,
P. C.
,
Rowssow
,
M.
, and
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
,
1979
, “Analysis of Load Displacement Relationship to Determine J-R Curve and Tearing Instability Material Properties,” Fracture Mechanics, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No.
ASTM STP 677
, pp.
581
599
.10.1520/STP34937S
16.
Ernst
,
H. A.
,
Paris
,
P. C.
, and
Landes
,
J. D.
,
1981
, “Estimations on J-Integral and Tearing Modulus T from a Single Specimen Test Record,” Fracture Mechanics, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No.
ASTM STP 743
, pp.
476
502
.10.1520/STP28814S
17.
Kim
,
K. C.
,
Kim
,
J. T.
,
Suk
,
J. I.
,
Sung
,
U. H.
, and
Kwon
,
H. K.
,
2004
, “
Influences of the Dynamic Strain Aging on the J-R Fracture Characteristics of the Ferritic Steels for Reactor Coolant Piping System
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
228
(
1–3
), pp.
151
159
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2003.06.014
You do not currently have access to this content.