Piping thermal expansion stress limits for ASME Section III Class 2 and 3 piping are directly based on the original thermal expansion rules for B31.1 piping published in 1955. Temperature limits for B31 piping are much higher than for Class 2/3 nuclear piping. The fundamental concern in 1955 for piping design was to prevent cyclic creep strains, and the thermal expansion rules were based on a strain range criterion. Fatigue was also a concern, and a stress-range reduction factor for cyclic conditions was incorporated into the strain-based rule. The history and development of the B31.1 thermal expansion rules are summarized. After review of the technical basis, it becomes evident that the nuclear Class 2/3 rules can be simplified and improved by changing to an explicit fatigue-based rule rather than the strain-based rule of B31.1. Recommended Section III code revisions are provided with discussion of related technical issues.

1.
Slagis
,
G. C.
, 1988, “
Commentary on Class 2/3 Piping Rules
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
110
, pp.
329
334
.
2.
Markl
,
A. R. C.
, 1952, “
Fatigue Tests of Piping Components
,”
Trans. ASME
0097-6822,
74
(
3
), pp.
287
303
.
3.
1994, “
Pressure Vessel and Piping Design–Collected Papers 1927–1959
,” ASME.
4.
Markl
,
A. R. C.
, 1947, “
Fatigue Tests of Welding Elbows and Comparable Double-Mitre Bends
,”
Trans. ASME
0097-6822,
69
(
8
), pp.
869
879
.
5.
Markl
,
A. R. C.
, 1955, “
Piping-Flexibility Analysis
,”
Trans. ASME
0097-6822,
77
(
2
), p.
12743
.
You do not currently have access to this content.