Excessive relative motions between Floating Production Storage Offloading Unit (FPSO), and tanker, which are termed as excessive surging and yawing events, are identified as the “failure prone situation” in tandem offloading. These events have contributed to the initiation of tanker drive-off in most collision incidents that happened in the North Sea in recent years. To estimate and reduce the probability of excessive surging and yawing events in tandem offloading, a simulation-based approach, which is based on a state-of-the-art time-domain simulation code SIMO, is presented in this paper. A typical North Sea FPSO and a DP shuttle tanker simulation models are setup in SIMO and calibrated by full-scale measurements. The simulated relative distance and relative heading between FPSO and tanker are analyzed by fitting their extreme values into statistical models which give out probabilities of excessive surging and yawing events. Sensitivity studies are performed to pinpoint contributions from various technical and operational factors. Measures to minimize the occurrence of excessive surging and yawing events are identified in design and operational perspectives.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
ships, safety, collision avoidance, engineering
Topics:
FPSO, Tankers, Yaw, Simulation, Vessels, Probability
1.
Vinnem, J. E., 1999, Offshore Risk Assessment Principles, Modeling and Applications of QRA studies, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, p. 393.
2.
Leonhardsen, R. L., Ersdal, G., Kvitrud, A., 2001, “Experience and risk assessment of FPSOs in use on the Norwegian Continental Shelf: Description of events,” Proceedings of the 11th ISOPE Conference, Stavanger, Norway, Vol. I.
3.
Chen, H. and Moan, T., 2002, “Collision risk analysis of FPSO-Tanker offloading operation,” OMAE2002-28103, Proceedings of the 21st OMAE Conference, Oslo, Norway.
4.
HSE, 1997, “Close proximity study,” Offshore Technology Report-OTO 97055, Health & Safety Executive, UK.
5.
Hals, T., 2000, “Customer acceptance test procedure-Tandem Loading,” Kongsberg Simrad.
6.
Chen, H., 2001, “FSU-Tanker Offloading Operation: Information from offshore Trip,” Memo 03-07-01, Revision 24-07-01, Dept. of Marine Structures, NTNU. [Restricted].
7.
STATOIL, 2000, “Granskningsrapport fra berøring,” Document No. 00A05*0209. [in Norwegian]
8.
Navion, 1997, “Training requirements for shuttle tanker and conventional tanker personnel,” Report No. NAV/KR-508.
9.
SMS, 2000, “Offshore loading phase 2,” DP training course material, Ship Manoeuvring Simulator Centre AS, Trondheim.
10.
UKOOA, 2002, “Tandem Loading Guidelines: FPSO/Tanker Risk Control During Offtake,” Vol.1, Rev. B, UKOOA FPSO Committee, UK.
11.
Hals, T., 2001, Private communication regarding tandem loading DP software, Kongsberg Simrad.
12.
Inoue, Y. and Islam, M. R., 1999, “Relative motions of multiple floating offshore structures,” OMAE99/OFT-4192, Proceedings of the 18th OMAE Conference, Newfoundland, Canada.
13.
Morandimi, C., Legerstee, F., Francois, M., and Raposo, C. V., 2001, “Numerical analysis of FPSO offloading operations,” OMAE2001/OFT-1002, Proceedings of the 20th OMAE Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
14.
Morishita, H. M., Souza, Junior J. R. D, Cornet, B. J. J., 2001, “Nonlinear Dynamics of a FPSO and Shuttle vessels in Tandem Configuration,” Proceedings of the 11th ISOPE Conference, Vo. I, Stavanger, Norway.
15.
Sphaier, S. H., Fernandes, A. C., Correa, S. H. S., and Castro, G. A. V., 2001, “Maneuvering model for FPSOs and offloading analysis,” OMAE2001/OFT-1303, Proceedings of the 20th OMAE Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
16.
Reinholdtsen, S. A. and Falkenberg, E., 2000, “SIMO–Theory/User Manual,” MT51 F93-0184, MARINTEK, Trondheim, Norway.
17.
Fylling, I., Stansberg, C. T. and Mo, K., 1992, “Extreme motions and anchor line loads in turret mooring systems,” Vol. 1, BOSS’92.
18.
Ormberg, H. and Larsen, K., 1998, “Coupled analysis of floater motion and mooring dynamics for a turret-moored ship,” Applied Ocean Research, 20, pp. 55-67.
19.
MARINTEK, 1994, 1999, “FPSO motion model test results,” Reports excerpt received from Statoil.
20.
Andersen, O. J., 2000, “FPSO motions in offloading,” Report PTT MA MKS, (in Norwegian), Statoil.
21.
Blom, 2002, “Data Preparation–FPSO & Tanker,” Doc. 0214022-0200075, Rev.01.
22.
Fucatu, C. H., Nishimoto, K., Maeda, H., and Masetti, I. Q., 2001, “The shadow effect on the dynamics of a shuttle tanker,” OMAE2001/OFT-1132, Proceedings of the 20th OMAE Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
23.
Gudmestad, K. and Aanonsen, G., 2001, “Private communication regarding shuttle tanker thruster, main propeller and rudder information,” Kongsberg Simrad.
24.
Tønnessen, H., 1999, Hindcast data for wind sea and swell, The Norwegian Meteorological Institute.
25.
DNV, 1991, “Environmental conditions and environmental loads,” Classification Note No. 30.5, Det Norske Veritas.
26.
NTS, 1999, “Action and action effects,” NORSOK Standard N-003, Rev. 1.
Copyright © 2004
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.