A nine-degree-of-freedom time domain mathematical model was used to numerically simulate crane ship dynamics. This model considers the elasticity and damping of the hoisting rope assembly and includes arbitrary, biangular swing of the suspended hook load coupled with surge, sway, heave, roll, pitch, and yaw motions of the hull. The linear frequency-dependent hydrodynamic response to the hull’s own motions accounted for memory effects that were approximated in the time domain by a finite state space model. The nonlinear hydrodynamic drag force acting on the oscillating hull was quadratically approximated using an empirical drag coefficient. The incident wave force on the hull consisted of the first-order force oscillating at wave frequency and the second-order slowly varying wave drift force. The nonlinear horizontal mooring system restoring force was approximated by a third-order polynomial. To specify operating limits for a shear-leg crane barge in a heavy lift offshore operation, a stochastic analysis was performed based on the system’s simulated dynamic response in an ensemble of natural seaways.

1.
Nojiri, N., and Sasaki, T., 1983, “Motion Characteristics of Crane Vessels in Lifting Operation,” Proc. Offshore Technology Conference, Paper 4603, Houston, TX.
2.
O¨stergaard, C., Scharrer, M., and Schellin, T. E., 1982, “Structural Problems and Operational Risks of Floating Crane Operations” (in German), Proc., INTERMARITEC, C. Kruppa and G. Clauss, eds., Seehafen-Verlag Erik Blumenfeld, Hamburg, Germany, pp. 30–41.
3.
Scharrer
,
M.
, and
Schellin
,
T. E.
,
1983
, “
Crane Ship in Waves, Dynamic Loads on and Stresses in the Crane Structure” (in German
),
Trans. Schiffbaut. Gesells.
,
77
, pp.
247
263
.
4.
Schellin, T. E., Sharma, S. D., and Jiang, T., 1989, “Crane Ship Response to Regular Waves; Linearized Frequency Domain Analysis and Nonlinear Time Domain Simulation,” Proc., 8th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Vol. 2, ASME, The Hague, pp. 627–635.
5.
Schellin
,
T. E.
,
Jiang
,
T.
, and
Sharma
,
S. D.
,
1991
, “
Crane Ship Response to Wave Groups
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
113
, pp.
211
218
.
6.
Schellin
,
T. E.
,
Jiang
,
T.
, and
O¨stergaard
,
C.
,
1993
, “
Response Analysis and Operating Limits of Crane Ships
,”
J. Ship Res.
,
37
, pp.
225
238
.
7.
O¨stergaard
,
C.
,
1983
, “
Crane Ships at Sea—Operating Decisions” (in German
),
Trans. Schiffbaut. Gesells.
,
77
, pp.
275
298
.
8.
Jiang, T., Schellin, T. E., and Sharma, S. D., 1987, “Maneuvering Simulation of a Tanker Moored in a Steady Current Including Memory Effects and Stability Analysis,” Proc., International Conference on Ship Manoeuvrability, Paper 25, Vol. 1, Royal Institution of Naval Architects, London, U.K.
9.
Schiff, C., and Schellin, T. E., 1999, “Influence of Viscous Drag on System Behavior of a Crane Barge in Regular Waves” (in German), Report FG 99.027, Germanischer Lloyd, Hamburg, Germany.
10.
Clauss, G. F., and Vannahme, M., 1999, “An Experimental Study of the Nonlinear Dynamics of Floating Cranes,” Paper 9-JSC-343, Proc., 9th International Offshore Polar Engineering Conference & Exhibition (ISOPE-99), Brest, France.
11.
Global Wave Statistics, 1997, User Manual - PC GWS V2.20, British Maritime Technology Ltd., The Gresham Press, Old Working, Surrey, U.K.
12.
Ross, S. M., 1980, Introduction to Probability Models, 2nd Edition: Academic Press, New York, NY.
You do not currently have access to this content.