The aim of this paper is to summarize authors' experience in adaptation of an existing plant-specific VVER-1000/V320 model for simulation of a rare example of a Kalinin 3 nuclear power plant (NPP) transient of “switching-off of one of the four operating main circulation pumps at nominal reactor power” with an asymmetric core configuration. The fidelity and accuracy of simulation with emphasis on reactor core model is illustrated through comparison with plant-specific data. Simulation results concerning fuel assembly (FA) power and axial power distribution during the transient are compared with records from Kalinin 3 in-core monitoring system (ICMS). Main operating parameters of nuclear steam supply system of a VVER-1000/V320 series units vary to a considerable degree. While Kalinin 3 benchmark specification contains very good description of the transient, as well as record of many parameters of the unit, the document provides only superficial description of the reference unit. In such a case, an approach based on a “generic” V320 model by default introduces deviations which are difficult to quantify. There are several examples which warrant discussion. Some of the most important lessons learned are as follows. (1) individual characteristics of all the main circulation pumps and the reactor coolant loops are quite important for the quality of simulation and should be accounted for in the model; (2) variations in fuel assembly characteristics should be accounted for not only in terms of macroscopic cross section library but also in terms of local pressure loss coefficients and mixing factors in the case of mixed core loads; (3) comprehensive plant-specific model of dynamic response of instrumentation and control (I&C) systems is a necessity; dynamic characteristics of individual measurement channels (nuclear instrumentation, pressure, temperature) should be accounted for; and (4) comprehensive plant-specific model of balance-of-plant equipment, instrumentation, and control is a necessity. Above requirements impose a difficult task to comply with. Nevertheless, any individual nuclear power unit is supposed to maintain a detailed design database and data requirements for plant-specific model development should be considered.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 2017
Research-Article
Benchmarking the Real-Time Core Model for VVER-1000 Simulator Application on Asymmetric Core Load
Kostadin Ivanov
Kostadin Ivanov
Department of Nuclear Engineering,
North Carolina State University,
2500 Stinson Drive,
3140 Burlington Engineering Labs,
Raleigh, NC 27695-7909
e-mail: knivanov@ncsu.edu
North Carolina State University,
2500 Stinson Drive,
3140 Burlington Engineering Labs,
Raleigh, NC 27695-7909
e-mail: knivanov@ncsu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Emiliya Georgieva
Yavor Dinkov
Kostadin Ivanov
Department of Nuclear Engineering,
North Carolina State University,
2500 Stinson Drive,
3140 Burlington Engineering Labs,
Raleigh, NC 27695-7909
e-mail: knivanov@ncsu.edu
North Carolina State University,
2500 Stinson Drive,
3140 Burlington Engineering Labs,
Raleigh, NC 27695-7909
e-mail: knivanov@ncsu.edu
1Corresponding author.
Manuscript received September 30, 2016; final manuscript received December 14, 2016; published online May 25, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Leon Cizelj.
ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. Jul 2017, 3(3): 031005 (10 pages)
Published Online: May 25, 2017
Article history
Received:
September 30, 2016
Revised:
December 14, 2016
Citation
Georgieva, E., Dinkov, Y., and Ivanov, K. (May 25, 2017). "Benchmarking the Real-Time Core Model for VVER-1000 Simulator Application on Asymmetric Core Load." ASME. ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. July 2017; 3(3): 031005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035550
Download citation file:
94
Views
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Studies of the Thermalhydraulics Subchannel Code ASSERT-PV 3.2-SC for Supercritical Applications
ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci
Related Articles
Guidance and Methodologies for Managing Digital Instrumentation and Control Obsolescence
ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci (October,2016)
MCNP Simulation of In-Core Dose Rates for an Offline CANDU ® Reactor
ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci (July,2017)
Analyses of the Control System Strategies and Methodology for Part Power Control of the Simple and Intercooled Recuperated Brayton Helium Gas Turbine Cycles for Generation IV Nuclear Power Plants
ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci (October,2017)
A Feasibility Study of Noncontact Ultrasonic Sensor for Nuclear Power Plant Inspection
ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci (April,2017)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Insights and Results of the Shutdown PSA for a German SWR 69 Type Reactor (PSAM-0028)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Part 2, Section II—Materials and Specifications
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Second Edition
Part 2, Section II—Materials and Specifications
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Third Edition