Background. By the mid-1990s, the importance of the early introduction of new products to both market share and profitability became fully understood. Thus, reducing product time-to-market became an essential requirement for continuous competition. Coupled with the fact that about 70% of the life cycle cost of a product is committed at early design phases, the motivation for developing and implementing more effective methodologies for managing the design process of new product development projects became very strong. Method of Approach. One tool that helps in understanding and analyzing such a project is the design structure matrix (DSM). This paper presents a framework that obtains an optimum sequence of project activities—presented by the DSM—that minimizes total time and cost given stochastic activity estimated time and cost. The framework interfaces a meta-heuristic optimization algorithm called simulated annealing with a commercial risk analysis software. Results. The proposed framework was applied to a design project and the results have shown a robust solution minimum was reached. Conclusions. Since much of the time and cost involved in the design process is attributable to its expensive iterative nature. The framework presented in this paper improves a design project via obtaining an optimum sequence of its activities that minimizes total time and cost.

1.
Fiksel
,
J.
, 1991,
Design for Environment: Creating Eco-Efficient Products and Processes
,
McGraw-Hill
, New York.
2.
Pichler
,
R.
, and
Smith
,
P.
, 2003, “
Developing Your Products in Half the Time
,” CriticalEYE,
2003
, pp.
1
4
.
3.
Smith
,
P. G.
, and
Reinertsen
,
D. G.
, 1998, “
Faster to Market
,”
Mech. Eng. (Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.)
0025-6501, December, pp.
68
70
.
4.
Smith
,
P. G.
, and
Reinertsen
,
D. G.
, 1998,
Developing Products in Half the Time: New Rules, New Tools
,
Wiley
, New York.
5.
Smith
,
P. G.
, 1999, “
From Experience: Reaping Benefit from Speed to Market
,”
Journal of Product Innovation Management
,
16
, pp.
222
230
.
6.
Chakravarty
,
A. K.
, 2001, “
Overlapping Design and Build Cycles in Product Development
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
0377-2217,
134
, pp.
392
424
.
7.
Blackburn
,
J. D.
, 1991, “
New Product Development: The New Time Wars
,” in
Time-Based Competition
,
J. D.
Blackburn
, ed.,
Business One Irwin Publishers
, Homewood, IL.
8.
House
,
C. H.
, and
Price
,
R. L.
, 1991, “
The Return Map: Tracking Product Teams
,”
Harvard Bus. Rev.
0017-8012,
69
(
1
), pp.
92
101
.
9.
Stalk
,
G.
, 1988, “
Time: The Next Source of Competitive Advantage
,”
Harvard Bus. Rev.
0017-8012,
66
, pp.
41
51
.
10.
Armstrong
,
S. C.
, 2001,
Engineering and Product Development Management: The Holistic Approach
,
Cambridge University Press
, Cambridge.
11.
Peet
,
W. J.
, and
Hladik
,
K. J.
, 1989, “
Organizing for Global Product Development
,”
Electronic Business
,
15
(
5
), pp.
62
64
.
12.
Port
,
O.
, 1990, “
A Smarter Way to Manufacture
,”
Bus. Week
0007-7135, pp.
110
117
.
13.
1989,
Concurrent Design of Products and Processes: A Strategy for the Next Generation in Manufacturing
,
J. L.
Nevins
and
D. E.
Whitney
, eds.,
McGraw-Hill
, New York.
14.
O’Grady
,
P.
,
Ramers
,
D.
, and
Bowen
,
J.
, 1988, “
Artificial Intelligence Constraint Nets Applied to Design for Economic Manufacture and Assembly
,”
Comput.-Integr. Manuf. Syst.
0951-5240,
1
(
4
), pp.
204
210
.
15.
Browning
,
T. R.
, 2001, “
Modeling the Customer Value of Product Development Processes
,”
Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Symposium of INCOSE
,
Melbourne, Australia
, July 1–5.
16.
Browning
,
T. R.
, and
Eppinger
,
S. D.
, 2002, “
Modeling Impacts of Process Architecture on Cost and Schedule Risk in Product Development
,”
IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.
0018-9391,
49
(
4
), pp.
443
458
.
17.
Steward
,
D. V.
, 1981, “
The Design Structure System: A Method for Managing the Design of Complex Systems
,”
IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.
0018-9391,
28
, pp.
71
74
.
18.
Steward
,
D. V.
, 1981,
Systems Analysis and Management: Structure, Strategy, and Design
,
PBI
, New York.
19.
Gebala
,
D. A.
, and
Eppinger
,
S. D.
, 1991, “
Methods for Analyzing Design Procedures
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Third International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology
, pp.
227
233
.
20.
Warfield
,
J. N.
, 1973, “
Binary Matrices in System Modeling
,”
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.
0018-9472,
3
, pp.
441
449
.
21.
Kusiak
,
A.
,
Larson
,
N.
, and
Wang
,
J.
, 1994, “
Reengineering of Design and Manufacturing Processes
,”
Comput. Ind. Eng.
0360-8352,
26
(
3
), pp.
521
536
.
22.
Ledet
,
W. P.
, and
Himmelblau
,
D. M.
, 1970, “
Decomposition Procedures for the Solving of Large Scale Systems
,”
Adv. Chem. Eng.
0065-2377,
8
, pp.
185
254
.
23.
Rogers
,
J. L.
, 1996, “
DeMaid/GA — An Enhanced Design Manager’s Aid for Intelligent Decomposition
,” 6th AIAA/USAF/NASA/OSSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Seattle, WA, September 4–6, 1996. AIAA Paper No. 96-4157.
24.
Rogers
,
J. L.
,
McCulley
,
C. M.
, and
Bloebaum
,
C. L.
, 1996, “
Integrating a Genetic Algorithm Into a Knowledge-Based System for Ordering Complex Design Processes
,”
Proceedings, the 96 Artificial Intelligence on Design Conference
,
Stanford University
,
CA
. Also NASA TM - 110247.
25.
Altus
,
S. S.
,
Kroo
,
I. M.
, and
Gage
,
P. J.
, 1996, “
A Genetic Algorithm for Scheduling and Decomposition of Multidisciplinary Design Problems
,”
Trans. ASAE
0001-2351,
118
(
4
), pp.
486
489
.
27.
Austin
,
S.
,
Baldwin
,
A.
,
Li
,
B.
, and
Waskett
,
P.
, 2000, “
Analytical Design Planning Technique (ADePT): A Dependency Structure Matrix Tool to Schedule the Building Design Process
,”
Constr. Manage. Econom.
0144-6193,
8
, pp.
173
182
.
28.
Austin
,
S.
,
Baldwin
,
A.
,
Li
,
B.
, and
Waskett
,
P.
, 2000, “
Application of the Analytical Design Planning Technique to Construction Project Management
,”
Proj. Manage. J.
8756-9728,
31
(
2
), pp.
48
59
.
29.
Cho
,
S-H.
, 2001, “
An Integrated Method For Managing Complex Engineering Projects Using the Design Structure Matrix and Advanced Simulation
,” M.S. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
30.
Kirkpatrick
,
S.
,
Gerlatt
,
C. D.
, Jr.
, and
Vecchi
,
M. P.
, 1982, “Optimization by Simulated Annealing,” IBM Research Report, RC 9355.
31.
Cerny
,
V.
, 1985, “
Thermodynamical Approach to the Traveling Salesman Problem: An Efficient Simulation Algorithm
,”
J. Optim. Theory Appl.
0022-3239,
45
(
1
), pp.
41
51
.
32.
Koulamas
,
C.
,
Antony
,
S. R.
, and
Jean
,
R.
, 1994, “
A Survey of Simulated Annealing Applications to Operations Research Problems
,”
Omega
0305-0483,
22
(
1
), pp.
41
56
.
33.
Van Laarhoven
,
P. J. M.
, and
Aarts
,
E. H. L.
, 1987,
Simulated Annealing: Theory and Applications
,
Reidel
, Holland.
34.
Law
,
A. M.
, and
Kelton
,
W. D.
, 2000,
Simulation Modeling and Analysis
, 3rd ed.,
McGraw-Hill
, Boston.
35.
Akbay
,
K. S.
, 1996, “
Using Simulation Optimization to Find the Best Solution
,” IIE Solutions,
28
(
5
), pp.
24
29
.
36.
Rogers
,
J. L.
, and
Bloebaum
,
C. L.
, 1994, “
Ordering Design Tasks Based on Coupling Strengths
,”
Proceeding, the 5th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization
,
Panama City, Florida
. AIAA paper No. 94-4326. Also NASA TM 109137.
37.
Smith
,
R. P.
, and
Eppinger
,
S. D.
, 1997, “
Identifying Controlling Features of Engineering Design Iteration
,”
Mater. Des. Eng.
0465-2886,
43
(
3
), pp.
276
293
.
You do not currently have access to this content.