Light weight high strength composites can be obtained by reinforcing resin with fillers such as hollow or solid particles and fibers. Composites were fabricated using microballoons (hollow particles) called syntactic foams. These foams can be used in various low density applications such as buoyancy aid materials for deep sea exploration and aerospace vehicles. These foams are usually utilized as light weight core materials for sandwich structures. The present study explores the procedure to fabricate functionally gradient syntactic foams (FGSFs) and further analyze their mechanical properties. The FGSFs produced are gradient structures consisting of four layers with four different types of microballoons, namely, S22, S32, S38, and K46, each having different wall thickness. The volume fraction of all microballoons is maintained constant at 60% to maintain light weight structures. Several FGSF specimens having similar density are fabricated with different layer arrangements. The different layers are integrated before major solidification takes place. Quasistatic compression testing is then performed on the cured FGSF samples using MTS-810 servohydraulic machine. Compressive strength and energy absorption values for each arrangement are compared. The stress plateau in integrated FGSF composites extends from 10% to 60% strain compared with plain syntactic foams. The integrated FGSF shows increment in yield strength and energy absorption compared with adhesively bonded FGSF. It is found that the compressive strength and energy absorption of integrated FGSF composites can be varied based on arrangement of the layers.

1.
Noor
,
A. K.
,
Burton
,
W. S.
, and
Bert
,
C. W.
, 1996, “
Computation Models for Sandwich Panels and Shells
,”
Appl. Mech. Rev.
0003-6900,
49
(
3
), pp.
155
198
.
2.
Gupta
,
N.
,
Woldesenbet
,
E.
, and
Mensah
,
P.
, 2004, “
Compression Properties of Syntactic Foams: Effect of Cenosphere Radius Ratio and Specimen Aspect Ratio
,”
Composites, Part A
1359-835X,
35
(
1
), pp.
103
111
.
3.
Gupta
,
N.
, and
Woldesenbet
,
E.
, 2003, “
Hygrothermal Studies on Syntactic Foams and Compressive Strength Determination
,”
Compos. Struct.
0263-8223,
61
(
4
), pp.
311
320
.
4.
Karthikeyan
,
C. S.
,
Sankaran
,
S.
, and
Kishore
,
A.
,2001, “
Effect of Absorption in Aqueous and Hygrothermal Media on the Compressive Properties of Glass Fiber Reinforced Syntactic Foam
,”
J. Reinf. Plast. Compos.
0731-6844,
20
(
11
), pp.
982
993
.
5.
Gupta
,
N.
,
Kishore
,
A.
,
Woldesenbet
,
E.
,
Sankaran
,
S.
, 2001, “
Studies on Compressive Failure Features in Syntactic Foam Material
,”
J. Mater. Sci.
0022-2461,
36
(
18
), pp.
4485
4491
.
6.
Hodge
,
A. J.
, 2000,
NASA
Technical Report No. NASA/TM 2000-210252.
7.
Suits
,
M.
, 1999,
NASA
Technical Report No. NASA/TM-1999-209148.
8.
Watkins
,
L.
, 1991,
Syntactic Foam Buoyancy for Production Risers
,
LLC
,
Houston, TX
.
9.
Hinves
,
J. B.
, and
Douglas
,
C. D.
, 1993, “
Engineering in Harmony With Ocean
,”
Proceedings
, Vol.
3
,
Victoria, BC, Canada
, pp.
468
472
.
10.
Gupta
,
N.
, and
Ricci
,
W.
, 2006, “
Comparison of Compressive Properties of Layered Syntactic Foams Having Gradient in Microballoon Volume Fraction and Wall Thickness
,”
Mater. Sci. Eng., A
0921-5093,
427
, pp.
331
342
.
11.
Gupta
,
N.
, and
Woldesenbet
,
E.
, 2004, “
Microballoon Wall Thickness Effects on Properties of Syntactic Foams
,”
J. Cell. Plast.
0021-955X,
40
, pp.
461
480
.
12.
Woldesenbet
,
E.
,
Gupta
,
N.
, and
Jadhav
,
A.
, 2005, “
Effects of Density and Strain Rate on Properties of Syntactic Foams
,”
J. Mater. Sci.
0022-2461,
40
(
15
), pp.
4009
4017
.
13.
Gupta
,
N.
,
Maharsia
,
R.
, and
Jerro
,
H. D.
, 2005, “
Enhancement of Energy Absorption Characteristics of Hollow Glass Particle Filled Composites by Rubber Addition
,”
Mater. Sci. Eng., A
0921-5093,
395
, pp.
233
240
.
14.
Gupta
,
N.
, and
Maharsia
,
R.
, 2005, “
Enhancement of Energy Absorption in Syntactic Foams by Nanoclay Incorporation for Sandwich Core Applications
,”
Appl. Compos. Mater.
0929-189X,
12
(
3–4
), pp.
247
261
.
15.
Kishore
,
Shankar
,
R.
, and
Sankaran
,
S.
, 2005, “
Gradient Syntactic Foams: Tensile Strength, Modulus and Fractographic Features
,”
Mater. Sci. Eng., A
0921-5093,
412
, pp.
153
158
.
16.
Parameswaran
,
V.
, and
Shukla
,
A.
, 2000, “
Processing and Characterization of a Model Functionally Gradient Material
,”
J. Mater. Sci.
0022-2461,
35
(
1
), pp.
21
29
.
17.
Parameswaran
,
V.
, and
Shukla
,
A.
, 2002, “
Near-Tip Out of Plane Displacement Fields for Dynamic Crack Propagation in Functionally Graded Materials
,”
Mech. Res. Commun.
0093-6413,
29
(
5
), pp.
397
405
.
18.
El-Hadek
,
M. A.
, and
Tippur
,
H. V.
, 2003, “
Dynamic Fracture Parameters and Constraint Effects in Functionally Graded Syntactic Epoxy Foams
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
0020-7683,
40
(
8
), pp.
1885
1906
.
19.
Gupta
,
N.
, 2007, “
A Functionally Graded Syntactic Foam Material for High Energy Absorption
,”
Mater. Lett.
0167-577X,
61
(
4–5
), pp.
979
982
.
20.
da Silvaa
,
L. F. M.
, and
Adams
,
R. D.
, 2007, “
Techniques to Reduce the Peel Stresses in Adhesive Joints With Composites
,”
Int. J. Adhes. Adhes.
0143-7496,
27
, pp.
227
235
.
21.
ASTM International
, 1994, “
Standard Test Method for Density of Sandwich Core Materials
,” ASTM Paper No. C 271-94.
22.
Gladysz
,
G. M.
,
Perry
,
B.
,
McEachen
,
G.
, and
Lula
,
J.
, 2006, “
Three Phase Syntactic Foams: Structure Property Relationships
,”
J. Mater. Sci.
0022-2461,
41
(
13
), pp.
4085
4092
.
23.
ASTM International
, 2005, “
Standard Test Method for Flat-Wise Compressive Properties of Sandwich Cores
,” ASTM Paper No. C 365/C 365M-05.
You do not currently have access to this content.