Cold-rolled steel sheets of thicknesses ranging from 0.5 to 1.0 mm were used to produce tailor-welded blanks (TWBs) with various thickness ratios. In this study, the formability of the TWBs, as well as the mechanical characteristics of the weld zones, were analyzed experimentally under the effects of various thickness ratios of TWBs. The formability of the TWBs was evaluated in terms of three measures—failure mode, forming limit diagram, and minimum major strain, whereas the mechanical characteristics of the weld zones were investigated by tensile testing, metallographic study, and microhardness measurement. In particular, circular TWBs with different radii and cutoff widths were designed where all the welds were located in the center of the blanks and perpendicular to the principal strain direction. Nd:YAG laser butt-welding was used to weld the TWB specimens of different thickness ratios. The experimental findings in this study showed that the higher the thickness ratio of the TWBs, the lower the forming limit curve level, and the lower formability. The minimum major strain was clearly inversely proportional to the thickness ratio of the TWBs. On the other hand, the results of uniaxial tensile tests clearly illustrated that there was no significant difference between the tensile strengths of the TWBs and those of the base metals. The metallographic study demonstrated a difference of grain size in the materials at base metal, heat-affected zones, and fusion zone. The microhardness measurement indicated that the hardness in the fusion zone increased by about 60% of the base metal.

1.
Kridli, G. T., Friedmen, P. A., and Sherman, A. M., 2000, “Formability of Aluminum Tailor-Welded Blanks,” SAE Technical Paper, Paper No. 2000-01-0772.
2.
Scriven
,
P. J.
,
Brandon
,
J. A.
, and
Williams
,
N. T.
,
1996
, “
Influence of Weld Orientation on Forming Limit Diagram of Similar/Dissimilar Thickness Laser Welded Joints
,”
Ironmaking Steelmaking
,
23
(
2
), pp.
177
182
.
3.
Keerler, S. P., 1968, “Circular Grid System–A valuable Aid for Evaluating Sheet Metal Formability,” SAE Techanical Paper, Paper No. 680092.
4.
Chen
,
L. X.
,
Bhandhubanyong
,
P.
,
Vajragupta
,
W.
, and
Somsiri
,
C.
,
1997
, “
Plastic Properties of Low-Carbon Steel Sheets
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
,
63
(
1-3
), pp.
95
99
.
5.
Samuels, L. E., 1999, Light Microscopy of Carbon Steels, Materials Park, OH.
6.
Waddell, W., Jacken, S., and Wallach, E. R., 1998, “The Influence of the Weld Structure on the Formability of Laser Welded Tailored Blanks,” SAE Technical Paper, Paper No. 982396.
7.
Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials [Metric], ASTM Standard E 8M-01.
8.
Standard Test Method for Vickers Hardness of Metallic Materials, ASTM Standard E 92-82.
9.
Min
,
K. B.
,
Kim
,
K. S.
, and
Kang
,
S. S.
,
2000
, “
A Study on Resistance Welding in Steel Sheets Using a Tailor-Welded Blank (1st Report): Evaluation of Upset Weldability and Formability
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
,
101
(
1-3
), pp.
186
192
.
10.
Rao
,
K. P.
, and
Mohan
,
V. R.
,
2000
, “
An Investigation of the Influence of Pre-Strain on Material Properties of Sheet Brass
,”
Key Eng. Mater.
,
177-180
, pp.
509
516
.
11.
Sigeert, K., and Knabe, E., 1995, “Fundamental Research and Draw Die Concepts for Deep Drawing of Tailored Blanks,” SAE Technical Paper, Paper No. 950921.
12.
Shi, M. F., Pickett, K. M., and Bhatt, K. K., 1993, “Formability Issues in the Application of Tailor Welded Blank Sheets,” SAE Technical Paper, Paper No. 930278.
You do not currently have access to this content.