Signals from several sensors were employed for real-time laser weld quality monitoring. Sheet-metal butt-joint laser welds of three quality classes (full penetration, partial penetration, gapped) were produced in experimental trials. Optical, air-born acoustic and plasma charge signals acquired during welding were subsequently Fourier-transformed and the spectra were analyzed individually to determine relationships to laser weld quality. The frequency bands most highly correlated to weld quality were identified by stepwise linear discriminant analysis (LDA) of the spectra. Testing of the quality discriminators formulated by LDA of the spectral data showed that the acoustic signal was most reliably correlated with weld quality. Fusing the data from all three sensors prior to LDA analysis produced a discriminator that had about the same reliability as one based on acoustic data alone.

1.
Farson
,
D.
, and
Ali
,
A.
,
1999
, “
Laser Weld Penetration Monitoring With Multiple Emission Signal Measurements
,”
J. Laser Appl.
,
11
, pp.
47
53
.
2.
Farson
,
D.
,
2000
, “
Progress in Real-Time Laser Process Monitoring: Theory and Practice
,”
Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining
,
5
, pp.
194
201
.
3.
Sun
,
A.
,
Kannatey-Asibu
,
E.
, and
Gartner
,
M.
,
1999
, “
Sensor Systems for Real-Time Monitoring of Laser Weld Quality
,”
J. Laser Appl.
,
11
, pp.
153
168
.
4.
Johnson, R., and Wichern, D., 1988, Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 2nd Ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
5.
Gu
,
H.
, and
Duley
,
W.
,
1996
, “
A Statistical Approach to Acoustic Monitoring of Laser Welding
,”
J. Phys. D
,
29
, pp.
556
560
.
6.
Emel
,
E.
, and
Kannatey-Asibu
,
E.
,
1988
, “
Tool Failure Monitoring in Turning by Pattern Recognition Analysis of AE Signals
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
110
, pp.
137
145
.
7.
Ravindra
,
H. V.
,
Srinivasa
,
Y. G.
, and
Krishnamurthy
,
R.
,
1993
, “
Tool Wear Monitoring in Turning Using a Pattern Recognition Technique
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
,
37
, pp.
731
740
.
8.
Mori
,
K.
,
Kasashima
,
N.
,
Fu
,
J. C.
, and
Muto
,
K.
,
1999
, “
Prediction of Small Drill Bit Breakage by Wavelet Transforms and Linear Discriminant Functions
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
,
39
, pp.
1471
1484
.
9.
Gu, S., and Ni, J., 1996, “Multi-Spindle Drilling Process Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis,” Proceedings, 1996 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, ASME MED Vol. 4, pp. 555–562.
10.
Farson, D., and Kern, K., 1991, “Neural Network Classification of Laser Welds From Acoustical Signals.” Proceedings ICALEO’90, Orlando, FL, pp. 35–42.
11.
Beyer, E., Maischner, D., and Kratzsch, Ch., 1995, “A Neural Network to Analyze Plasma Fluctuations with the Aim to Determine the Degree of full Penetration in Laser Welding,” Proceedings ICALEO’94, Laser Institute of America, Orlando, FL, pp. 51–57.
12.
Ali, A., 1999, “In-Process Quality Monitoring of Laser Welds Using Multi-Sensor Measurements,” Ph.D. Thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
13.
Johnson, R. A., and Wichern, D. W., 1992, Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
14.
SAS®/STAT User’s Guide, Ver. 6, 4th Ed., 1990, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC.
15.
Murray
,
G.
,
1977
, “
A Cautionary Note on Selection of Variables in Discriminant Analysis
,”
Appl. Stat.
,
26
, No.
3
, pp.
246
250
.
16.
Lachenbruch, P., 1975, Discriminant Analysis, Hafner Press, New York, NY.
17.
Miller, I., and Freund, J., 1977, Probability and Statistics for Engineers, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
18.
Brooks, I., and Iyengar, S., 1998, Multisensor Fusion, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
You do not currently have access to this content.