The superposition-based Discrete Green’s Function (DGF) technique provides a general representation of convective heat transfer that can capture the numerous flow and thermal complexities of the gas turbine environment and provide benchmark data for the validation of computational codes. The main advantages of the DGF technique are that the measurement apparatus is easier to fabricate than a uniform heat flux or uniform temperature surface, and that the results are applicable to any choice of discretized thermal boundary condition. Once determined for a specific flow condition, the DGF results can be used, for example, with measured surface temperature data to estimate the surface heat flux. In this study, the experimental DGF approach was extended to the suction side blade surface of a single passage model of a turbine cascade. Full-field thermal data were acquired using a steady state, liquid crystal-based imaging technique. The objective was to compute a 10×10 one-dimensional DGF matrix in a realistic turbomachinery geometry. The inverse 1-D DGF matrix, G1, was calculated and its uncertainties estimated. The DGF-based predictions for the temperature rise and Stanton number distributions on a uniform heat flux surface were found to be in good agreement with experimental data. The G matrix obtained by a direct inversion of G1 provided reasonable heat transfer predictions for standard thermal boundary conditions.

1.
Sellars
,
J. R.
,
Tribus
,
M.
, and
Klein
,
J. S.
,
1956
, “
Heat Transfer to Laminar Flow in a Round Tube or Flat Conduit—the Graetz Problem Extended
,”
Trans. ASME
,
78
, pp.
441
448
.
2.
Reynolds, W. C., Kays, W. M., and Kline, S. J., 1958a, “Heat Transfer in the Turbulent Incompressible Boundary Layer—Step Wall-Temperature Boundary Conditions,” NASA Memo 12-2-58W, Washington, D.C.
3.
Reynolds, W. C., Kays, W. M., and Kline, S. J., 1958b, “Heat Transfer in the Turbulent Incompressible Boundary Layer—Arbitrary Wall Temperature and Heat Flux,” NASA Memo 12-3-58W, Washington, D.C.
4.
Ortega, A., and Moffat, R. J., 1986, “Experiments on Buoyancy-Induced Convection Heat Transfer From an Array of Cubical Elements on a Vertical Channel Wall,” Technical Report No. HMT-38, Mechanical Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
5.
Hacker
,
J. M.
, and
Eaton
,
J. K.
,
1997
, “
Measurements of Heat Transfer in a Separated and Reattaching Flow With Spatially Variable Thermal Boundary Conditions
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
18
, pp.
131
141
.
6.
Batchelder
,
K. A.
, and
Eaton
,
J. K.
,
2001
, “
Practical Experience With the Discrete Green’s Function Approach to Convective Heat Transfer
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
123
, pp.
70
76
.
7.
Batchelder, K. A., and Moffat, R. J., 1997, “Towards a Method for Measuring Heat Transfer in Complex 3-D Flows,” Technical Report No. TSD-108, Mechanical Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
8.
Buck, F. A., and Prakash, C., 1995, “Design and Evaluation of a Single Passage Test Model to Obtain Turbine Airfoil Film Cooling Effectiveness Data,” ASME Paper No. 95-GT-19.
9.
Farina
,
D. J.
,
Hacker
,
J. M.
,
Moffat
,
R. J.
, and
Eaton
,
J. K.
,
1994
, “
Illuminant Invariant Calibration of Thermochromic Liquid Crystals
,”
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
,
9
, pp.
765
775
.
10.
Kline
,
S. J.
, and
McClintock
,
F. A.
,
1953
, “
Describing Uncertainties in Single Sample Experiments
,”
Mech. Eng. (Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.)
,
75
, pp.
3
8
.
11.
Moffat
,
R. J.
,
1988
, “
Describing the Uncertainties in Experimental Results
,”
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
,
1
, pp.
3
17
.
12.
Kays, W. M., and Crawford, M. E., 1993, Convective Heat and Mass Transfer, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., NY.
You do not currently have access to this content.