Abstract

This work presents a systematic approach proceeding from the engine process simulation (one-dimensional (1D)-computational fluid dynamics (CFD)) and design of experiments (DoE) up to the experimental validation to build a dedicated exhaust-gas recirculation (EGR) system for a stationary four-cylinder naturally aspirated gas engine. This system should ensure an equal distribution of the recirculated exhaust gas, coming entirely from the rich-operated dedicated cylinder. The rich combustion enables an in-cylinder production of highly reactive species (mainly H2 and CO), resulting in increased EGR reactivity, which improves the dilution tolerance, leading to reduced wall heat losses and lower knock tendency in the EGR receiving cylinders. However, the EGR system design represents a challenge due to the pulsating exhaust gas flow from the dedicated cylinder, which leads to a considerable EGR maldistribution in the receiving cylinders. A numerical analysis of this effect demonstrated that the EGR distribution uniformity depends on the design and dimensions of the EGR path. Considering the numerous design parameters and taking into account that the optimum design of the EGR path is not necessarily the sum of optima from the one-factor-at-a-time variations, efficient DoE methodologies were applied. They enabled identifying the optimum set of the EGR path design-parameters, with an EGR rate maldistribution of about 1% points. To evaluate the quality of the numerical results, the dedicated EGR path with the optimum parameters set was built on the engine test bench. The experimental results confirm the simulative prediction accuracy, demonstrating the reliability of the pursued approach.

References

1.
German Federal Ministry of Justice
,
2019
, Vierundvierzigste Verordnung zur Durchführung des Bundes-Immissionsschutzgesetzes (Verordnung über mittelgroße Feuerungs-, Gasturbinen- und Verbrennungsmotoranlagen – 44. BImSchV).
2.
Cho
,
H. M.
, and
He
,
B. Q.
,
2007
, “
Spark Ignition Natural Gas Engines—A Review
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
48
(
2
), pp.
608
618
.10.1016/j.enconman.2006.05.023
3.
Einewall
,
P.
,
Tunestal
,
P.
, and
Johansson
,
B.
,
2005
, “
Lean Burn Natural Gas Operation vs. Stoichiometric Operation With EGR and a Three Way Catalyst
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2005-01-0250. 10.4271/2005-01-0250
4.
Alger
,
T.
,
Chauvet
,
T.
, and
Dimitrova
,
Z.
,
2008
, “
Synergies Between High EGR Operation and GDI Systems
,”
SAE Int. J. Engines
,
1
(
1
), pp.
101
114
.10.4271/2008-01-0134
5.
Alger
,
T.
,
Gingrich
,
J.
, and
Mangold
,
B.
,
2007
, “
The Effect of Hydrogen Enrichment on EGR Tolerance in Spark Ignited Engines
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2007-01- 0475. 10.4271/2007-01- 0475
6.
Alger
,
T.
,
Hahne
,
S.
,
Roberts
,
C.
, and
Ryan
,
T.
,
2005
, “
The Heavy Duty Gasoline Engine – a Multi-Cylinder Study of a High Efficiency, Low Emission Technology
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2005-01-1135. 10.4271/2005-01-1135
7.
Cairns
,
A.
,
Blaxill
,
H.
, and
Irlam
,
G.
,
2006
, “
Exhaust Gas Recirculation for Improved Part and Full Load Fuel Economy in a Turbocharged Gasoline Engine
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2006-01-0047. 10.4271/2006-01-0047
8.
Duchaussoy
,
Y.
,
Lefebvre
,
A.
, and
Bonetto
,
R.
,
2003
, “
Dilution Interest on Turbocharged SI Engine Combustion
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2003-01-0629. 10.4271/2003-01-0629
9.
Alger
,
T.
, and
Mangold
,
B.
,
2009
, “
Dedicated EGR: A New Concept in High Efficiency Engines
,”
SAE Int. J. Engines
,
2
(
1
), pp.
620
631
.10.4271/2009-01-0694
10.
He
,
Z.
,
2018
, “
Researches on Spark Ignition Natural Gas Engine Based on in-Cylinder Thermochemical Fuel Reforming (TFR) Concept
,” Key Laboratory for Power Machinery and Engineering of M.O.E.,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
, Shanghai, China.
11.
Shao
,
Y.
,
Sun
,
Q.
,
Li
,
A.
,
He
,
Z. Y.
,
Xu
,
Z.
,
Qian
,
Y.
,
Lu
,
X. C.
,
Huang
,
Z.
, and
Zhu
,
L.
,
2019
, “
Effects of Natural Gas, Ethanol, and Methanol Enrichment on the Performance of in-Cylinder Thermochemical Fuel Reforming (TFR) Spark-Ignition Natural Gas Engine
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
159
, p.
113913
.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113913
12.
Denton
,
B.
,
Chadwell
,
C.
,
Gukelberger
,
R.
, and
Alger
,
T.
,
2017
, “
Design and Implementation of a D-EGR® Mixer for Improved Dilution and Reformate Distribution
,”
SAE Int. J. Engines
,
10
(
3
), pp.
892
897
.10.4271/2017-01-0647
13.
Neher
,
D.
,
Fieg
,
S.
,
Rieb
,
W.
,
Bauer
,
J.
, and
Kettner
,
M.
,
2017
, “
Simulationsgestützte Entwicklung Eines Hochverdichteten Gemischansaugenden Magerbetriebenen Erdgasmotors Zur Erfüllung Zukünftiger Emissionsgrenzwerte
,”
WTZ Gasmotorenkonferenz
, Dessau-Roßlau, Germany, Apr.
14.
SAE International in United States
,
2011
, “
Engine Terminology and Nomenclature – General
,”
SAE
Paper No. J604_201108. 10.4271/J604_201108
15.
Robinson
,
T. J.
, and
Anderson-Cook
,
C. M.
,
2010
, “
A Closer Look at D-Optimality for Screening Designs
,”
Qual. Eng.
,
23
(
1
), pp.
1
14
.10.1080/08982112.2010.505220
You do not currently have access to this content.