Combustion instability, the coupling between flame heat release rate oscillations and combustor acoustics, is a significant issue in the operation of gas turbine combustors. This coupling is often driven by oscillations in the flow field. Shear layer roll-up, in particular, has been shown to drive longitudinal combustion instability in a number of systems, including both laboratory and industrial combustors. One method for suppressing combustion instability would be to suppress the receptivity of the shear layer to acoustic oscillations, severing the coupling mechanism between the acoustics and the flame. Previous work suggested that the existence of a precessing vortex core (PVC) may suppress the receptivity of the shear layer, and the goal of this study is to first, confirm that this suppression is occurring, and second, understand the mechanism by which the PVC suppresses the shear layer receptivity. In this paper, we couple experiment with linear stability analysis to determine whether a PVC can suppress shear layer receptivity to longitudinal acoustic modes in a nonreacting swirling flow at a range of swirl numbers. The shear layer response to the longitudinal acoustic forcing manifests as an m = 0 mode since the acoustic field is axisymmetric. The PVC has been shown both in experiment and linear stability analysis to have m = 1 and m = −1 modal content. By comparing the relative magnitude of the m = 0 and m = −1,1 modes, we quantify the impact that the PVC has on the shear layer response. The mechanism for shear layer response is determined using companion forced response analysis, where the shear layer disturbance growth rates mirror the experimental results. Differences in shear layer thickness and azimuthal velocity profiles drive the suppression of the shear layer receptivity to acoustic forcing.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2018
Research-Article
Impact of Precessing Vortex Core Dynamics on Shear Layer Response in a Swirling Jet
Mark Frederick,
Mark Frederick
Mechanical Engineering,
The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: mdf5282@psu.edu
The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: mdf5282@psu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Joshua Dudash,
Joshua Dudash
Mechanical Engineering,
The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802
The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802
Search for other works by this author on:
Brian Brubaker,
Brian Brubaker
Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843
Search for other works by this author on:
Jacqueline O'Connor
Jacqueline O'Connor
Mechanical Engineering,
The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: jxo22@engr.psu.edu
The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: jxo22@engr.psu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark Frederick
Mechanical Engineering,
The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: mdf5282@psu.edu
The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: mdf5282@psu.edu
Kiran Manoharan
Joshua Dudash
Mechanical Engineering,
The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802
The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802
Brian Brubaker
Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843
Santosh Hemchandra
Jacqueline O'Connor
Mechanical Engineering,
The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: jxo22@engr.psu.edu
The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: jxo22@engr.psu.edu
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received August 2, 2017; final manuscript received August 22, 2017; published online January 17, 2018. Editor: David Wisler.
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. Jun 2018, 140(6): 061503 (10 pages)
Published Online: January 17, 2018
Article history
Received:
August 2, 2017
Revised:
August 22, 2017
Citation
Frederick, M., Manoharan, K., Dudash, J., Brubaker, B., Hemchandra, S., and O'Connor, J. (January 17, 2018). "Impact of Precessing Vortex Core Dynamics on Shear Layer Response in a Swirling Jet." ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. June 2018; 140(6): 061503. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038324
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Shape Optimization of an Industrial Aeroengine Combustor to reduce Thermoacoustic Instability
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Dynamic Response of A Pivot-Mounted Squeeze Film Damper: Measurements and Predictions
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Review of The Impact Of Hydrogen-Containing Fuels On Gas Turbine Hot-Section Materials
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Effects of Lattice Orientation Angle On Tpms-Based Transpiration Cooling
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Related Articles
Combustion Instabilities and Control of a Multiswirl Atmospheric Combustor
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (January,2007)
Low-Order Modeling of Nonlinear High-Frequency Transversal Thermoacoustic Oscillations in Gas Turbine Combustors
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (July,2017)
Effect of Insert Porosity on Combustion Instability in a Lean Premixed Combustor Analyzed by a Proper Orthogonal Decomposition-Based Phase Reconstruction Technique
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (August,2024)
Related Chapters
Cavitating Structures at Inception in Turbulent Shear Flow
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
Outlook
Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines: Operating Experience and Future Potential
Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Vortex Dynamics in Ventilated Cavitating Flows Around a Bluff Body
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)