A systematic and rational approach is presented for the consideration of uncertainty in rotordynamics systems, i.e., in rotor mass and gyroscopic matrices, stiffness matrix, and bearing coefficients. The approach is based on the nonparametric stochastic modeling technique, which permits the consideration of both data and modeling uncertainty. The former is induced by a lack of exact knowledge of properties such as density, Young’s modulus, etc. The latter occurs in the generation of the computational model from the physical structure as some of its features are invariably ignored, e.g., small anisotropies, or approximately represented, e.g., detailed meshing of gears. The nonparametric stochastic modeling approach, which is briefly reviewed first, introduces uncertainty in reduced order models through the randomization of their system matrices (e.g., stiffness, mass, and damping matrices of nonrotating structural dynamic systems). Here, this methodology is extended to permit the consideration of uncertainty in symmetric and asymmetric rotor dynamic systems. More specifically, uncertainties on the rotor stiffness (stiffness matrix) and/or mass properties (mass and gyroscopic matrices) are first introduced that maintain the symmetry of the rotor. The generalization of these concepts to uncertainty in the bearing coefficients is achieved next. Finally, the consideration of uncertainty in asymmetric rotors is described in detail.

1.
Ghanem
,
R.
, and
Spanos
,
P. D.
, 1991,
Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach
,
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
.
2.
Kleiber
,
M.
,
Tran
,
D. H.
, and
Hien
,
T. D.
, 1992,
The Stochastic Finite Element Method
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
3.
Schueller
,
G. I.
, 1997, “
A State-of-the-Art Report on Computational Stochastic Mechanics
,”
Probab. Eng. Mech.
0266-8920,
12
(
4
), pp.
197
321
.
4.
Wei
,
S. T.
, and
Pierre
,
C.
, 1990, “
Statistical Analysis of the Forced Response of Mistuned Cyclic Assemblies
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
28
(
5
), pp.
861
868
.
5.
Griffin
,
J. H.
, and
Hoosac
,
T. M.
, 1984, “
Model Development and Statistical Investigation of Turbine Blade Mistuning
,”
ASME J. Vib., Acoust., Stress, Reliab. Des.
0739-3717,
106
, pp.
204
210
.
6.
Rivas-Guerra
,
A. J.
, and
Mignolet
,
M. P.
, 2004, “
Local/Global Effects of Mistuning on the Forced Response of Bladed Disks
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
126
(
1
), pp.
131
141
.
7.
Soize
,
C.
, 2000, “
A Nonparametric Model of Random Uncertainties on Reduced Matrix Model in Structural Dynamics
,”
Probab. Eng. Mech.
0266-8920,
15
(
3
), pp.
277
294
.
8.
Soize
,
C.
, 2001, “
Maximum Entropy Approach for Modeling Random Uncertainties in Transient Elastodynamics
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
0001-4966,
109
(
5
), pp.
1979
1996
.
9.
Mignolet
,
M. P.
, and
Soize
,
C.
, 2008, “
Stochastic Reduced Order Models for Uncertain Nonlinear Dynamical Systems
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
0045-7825,
197
, pp.
3951
3963
.
10.
Mignolet
,
M. P.
, and
Soize
,
C.
, 2008, “
Nonparametric Stochastic Modeling of Linear Systems With Prescribed Variance Information of Several Natural Frequencies
,”
Probab. Eng. Mech.
0266-8920,
23
(
2–3
), pp.
267
278
.
11.
Soize
,
C.
, 2005, “
Random Matrix Theory for Modeling Uncertainties in Computational Mechanics
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
0045-7825,
194
, pp.
1333
1366
.
12.
Murthy
,
R.
, 2009, “
Nonparametric Stochastic Modeling of Uncertainty in Rotordynamics—Part II:Applications
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
132
(
9
), p.
092502
.
13.
Murthy
,
R.
, 2009, “
Nonparametric Stochastic Modeling of Uncertainty in Rotordynamics
,” MS thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
14.
Tawfick
,
S. H.
,
El-Shafei
,
A.
, and
Mokhtar
,
M. O. A.
, 2008, “
Field Identification of Stiffness and Damping Characteristics of Fluid Film Bearings
,”
ASME
, Paper No. GT2008-50909.
15.
Lee
,
C. -W.
, 1993,
Vibration Analysis of Rotors
,
Kluwer
,
Dordrecht
.
You do not currently have access to this content.