A rather complete mathematical model for a common-rail injection-system dynamics numerical simulation was developed to support experimentation, layout, and control design, as well as performance optimization. The thermofluid dynamics of the hydraulic-system components, including rail, connecting pipes, and injectors was modeled in conjunction with the solenoid-circuit electromagnetics and the mechanics of mobile elements. One-dimensional flow equations in conservation form were used to simulate wave propagation phenomena throughout the high-pressure connecting pipes, including the feeding pipe of the injector nozzle. In order to simulate the temperature variations due to the fuel compressibility, the energy equation was used in addition to mass conservation and momentum balance equations. Besides, the possible cavitation phenomenon effects on the mass flow rate through the injector bleed orifice and the nozzle holes were taken into account. A simple model of the electromagnetic driving circuit was used to predict the temporal distribution of the force acting on the pilot-valve anchor. It was based on the experimental time histories of the current through the solenoid and of the associated voltage that is provided by the electronic control unit to the solenoid. The numerical code was validated through the comparison of the prediction results with experimental data, that is, pressure, injected flow rate, and needle lift time histories, taken on a high performance test bench Moehwald-Bosch MEP2000-CA4000. The novel injection-system mathematical model was applied to the analysis of transient flows through the hydraulic circuit of a commercial multijet second-generation common-rail system, paying specific attention to the wave propagation phenomena, to their dependence on solenoid energizing time and rail pressure, as well as to their effects on system performance. In particular, an insight was also given into the model capability of accurately predicting the wave dynamics effects on the rate and mass of fuel injected when the dwell time between two consecutive injections is varied.

1.
Stumpp
,
G.
, and
Ricco
,
M.
, 1996, “
Common-Rail: An Attractive Fuel Injection System for Passenger Car DI Engines
,” SAE Paper No. 960870.
2.
Flaig
,
U.
,
Polach
,
W.
, and
Ziegler
,
G.
, 1999, “
Common Rail System for Passenger Car DI Diesel Engines; Experiences With Application for Series Production Projects
,” SAE Paper No. 1999-01-0191.
3.
Bianchi
,
G. M.
,
Pelloni
,
P.
,
Corcione
,
F. E.
, and
Luppino
,
F.
, 2001, “
Numerical Analysis of Passenger Car HSDI Diesel Engine With 2nd Generation of Common-Rail Injection System: The Effect of the Multiple Injections on Emissions
,” SAE Paper No. 2001-01-1068.
4.
Piepont
D. A.
,
Montgomery
,
D. T.
,
Reitz
R. D.
, and
Ziegler
,
G.
, 1994, “
Reducing Particulate and NOx Using Multiple Injections and EGR in a D.I. Diesel Engine
,” SAE Paper No. 940897.
5.
Wickman
,
D. D.
,
Tanin
,
K. V.
,
Senecal
,
P. K.
,
Reitz
,
R. D.
,
Gebert
,
K.
,
Barkhimer
,
R. L.
, and
Beck
,
N. J.
, 2000, “
Methods and Results from the Development of a 2600bar Diesel Fuel Injection System
,” SAE Paper No. 2000-01-0947.
6.
Amoia
,
V.
,
Ficarella
,
A.
,
Laforgia
,
D.
,
De Matthaeis
,
S.
,
Genco
,
C.
, and
Young
,
F. R.
, 1997, “
A Theoretical Code to Simulate the Behavior of an Electro-Injector for Diesel Engines and Parametric Analysis
,” SAE Paper No. 970349.
7.
Lasa
,
M.
,
Heinkel
,
H. M.
,
Moser
,
E.
, and
Rothfuβ
,
R.
, 2000 “
Expeditious Design of Mechatronic Systems Using a VHDL-AMS Based Standard Element Library—A Common Rail Example
,” SAE Paper No. 2000-01-0581.
8.
Wickman
,
D. D.
,
Tanin
,
K. V.
,
Das
,
S.
,
Reitz
,
R. D.
,
Gebert
,
K.
,
Barkhimer
,
R. L.
, and
Beck
,
N. J.
, 1998, “
An Evaluation of Common-Rail Hydraulically Intensified Diesel Fuel Injection System Concepts and Rate Shapes
,” SAE Paper No. 981930.
9.
Catalano
,
L. A.
,
Tondolo
,
V. A.
, and
Dadone
,
A.
, 2002, “
Dynamic Rise of Pressure in the Common-Rail Fuel Injection System
,” SAE Paper No. 2002-01-0210.
10.
Catania
,
A. E.
,
Ferrari
,
A.
,
Manno
,
M.
, and
Spessa
,
E.
, 2008, “
Experimental Investigation of Dynamics Effects on Multiple-Injection Common Rail System Performance
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
130
(
3
), p.
032806
.
11.
Zielke
,
W.
, 1968 “
Frequency-Dependent Friction in Transient Pipe Flow
,”
ASME J. Basic Eng.
0021-9223,
90
, pp.
109
115
.
12.
Kagawa
,
T.
,
Lee
,
I. Y.
,
Kitagawa
,
A.
, and
Takenaka
,
T.
, 1983 “
High Speed and Accurate Computing Method of Frequency-Dependent Friction in Laminar Pipe Flow for Characteristics Method
,”
Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. B
0387-5016,
49
, pp.
2638
2644
.
13.
Catania
,
A. E.
,
Ferrari
,
A.
,
Manno
,
M.
, and
Spessa
,
E.
, 2006, “
A Comprehensive Thermodynamic Approach to the Acoustic Cavitation Simulation in High-Pressure Injection Systems by a Conservative Homogeneous Two-Phase Barotropic Flow Model
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
128
, pp.
434
445
.
14.
Catania
,
A. E.
,
Ferrari
,
A.
,
Manno
,
M.
, and
Spessa
,
E.
, 2008, “
Temperature Variations in the Simulation of High-Pressure Injection-System Transient Flows Under Cavitation
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
0017-9310,
51
, pp.
2090
2107
.
15.
Catania
,
A. E.
,
Dongiovanni
,
C.
,
Mittica
,
A.
,
Badami
,
M.
, and
Lovisolo
,
F.
, 1994, “
Numerical Analysis Versus Experimental Investigation of a Distributor-Type Diesel Fuel-Injection System
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
116
, pp.
814
830
.
16.
Catania
,
A. E.
,
Dongiovanni
,
C.
,
Mittica
,
A.
,
Negri
,
C.
, and
Spessa
,
E.
, 1997, “
Experimental Evaluation of Injector-Nozzle-Hole Unsteady Flow-Coefficients in Light Duty Diesel Injection Systems
,”
Proceedings of the Ninth International Pacific Conference on Automotive Engineering Motor Vehicle and Environment
, SAE-Indonesia, Vol.
1
, pp.
283
290
.
17.
AMESim Manual, version 3.0.1, Imagine, Roanne, France.
18.
Von Kuensberg Sarre
,
C.
,
Kong
,
S. -C.
, and
Reitz
,
R. D.
, 1999, “
Modeling the Effects of Injector Nozzle Geometry on Diesel Sprays
,” SAE Paper No. 1999-01-0912.
19.
Toro
,
E. F.
, 1997,
Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics: A Practical Introduction
,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin
.
20.
Butcher
,
J. C.
, 1987,
The Numerical Analysis of Ordinary Differential Equations
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
21.
Catania
,
A. E.
,
Ferrari
,
A.
, and
Spessa
,
E.
, 2008, “
Numerical-Experimental Study and Solutions to Reduce the Dwell Time Threshold for Fusion-Free Consecutive Injections in a Multijet Solenoid-type CR Systems
,”
ASME ICED Spring Technical Conference, Paper No. ICES2006-1369, ICES2006 best paper award
, ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, in press.
You do not currently have access to this content.