This paper discusses novel schemes of combined cycle, where natural gas is chemically treated to remove carbon, rather than being directly used as fuel. Carbon conversion to CO2 is achieved before gas turbine combustion. The first part of the paper discussed plant configurations based on natural gas partial oxidation to produce carbon monoxide, converted to carbon dioxide by shift reaction and therefore separated from the fuel gas. The second part will address methane reforming as a starting reaction to achieve the same goal. Plant configuration and performance differs from the previous case because reforming is endothermic and requires high temperature heat and low operating pressure to obtain an elevated carbon conversion. The performance estimation shows that the reformer configuration has a lower efficiency and power output than the systems addressed in Part I. To improve the results, a reheat gas turbine can be used, with different characteristics from commercial machines. The thermodynamic efficiency of the systems of the two papers is compared by an exergetic analysis. The economic performance of natural gas fired power plants including CO2 sequestration is therefore addressed, finding a superiority of the partial oxidation system with chemical absorption. The additional cost of the kWh, due to the ability of CO2 capturing, can be estimated at about 13–14 mill$/kWh.

1.
Newby, R. A., Yang, W. C., and Bannister, R. L., 1997, “Use of Thermochemical Recuperation in Combustion Turbine Power Systems,” ASME paper No. 97-GT-36.
2.
Carcasci, C., Facchini, B., and Harvey, S., 1998, “Design & Off-Design Analysis of a CRGT Cycle Based on a LM2500-STIG Gas Turbine,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-36.
3.
Bram, S., Minsart, O., and De Ruyck, J., 1999, “The Potential of Fuel Reforming and Water Evaporation in Gas Turbine Cycles,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-368.
4.
Mayer, A., and van der Linden, S., 1999 “GT24/26 Advanced Cycle System Power Plant Progress for the New Millenium,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-404.
5.
Audus, H., Kaarstad, O., and Skinne, G., 1998, “CO2 Capture by Precombustion Decarbonization of Natural Gas,” Proc. of 4th Int’l Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Aug., Interlaken, Switzerland, Pergamon, Amsterdam, pp. 107–112.
6.
“TAG—Technical Assessment Guide (Electric Supply),” 1993, EPRI Report TR-102275 Vol. 1, Rev. 7, Palo Alto, CA.
7.
Hendriks, C., 1994, “Carbon Dioxide Removal From Coal-Fired Power Plants,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
8.
McMullan, J. T., 1995, “Techno-Economic Assessment Studies of Fossil Fuels and Fuel Woods Power Generation Technologies,” Joule II Program R&D in Clean Coal Technology, Report to the European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
9.
Corti, A., Lombardi, L., and Manfrida, G. P., 1998, “Absorption of CO2 With Amines in Semiclosed GT Cycle: Plant Performance and Operating Costs,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-395.
10.
Chiesa, P., and Consonni, S., 1999, “Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycles With Low CO2 Emissions,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-370.
11.
Gaudernack
,
B.
, and
Lynum
,
S.
,
1996
, “
Natural Gas Utilization Without CO2 Emissions
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
38, Suppl.
, pp.
S165–S172
S165–S172
.
12.
Go¨ttlicher
,
G.
, and
Pruscheck
,
R.
,
1996
, “
Comparison of CO2 Removal Systems for Fossil-Fueled Power Plant Processes
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
38
, Suppl., pp,
S173–S178
S173–S178
.
13.
Bannister, R. L., Newby, R. A., and Yang, W., 1998, “Final Report on the Development of Hydrogen-Fueled Combustion Turbine Cycle for Power Generation,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-21.
14.
Funatsu, T., Fukuda, M., and Dohzono, Y., 1997, “Start-Up Analysis of a H2-O2 Fired Gas Turbine Cycle,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-491.
15.
Fujioka
,
Y.
,
Ozaki
,
M.
,
Takeuchi
,
K.
,
Shindo
,
Y.
, and
Herzog
,
H. J.
,
1997
, “
Cost Comparison of Various CO2 Ocean Disposal Options
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
38, Suppl.
, pp.
S273–S277
S273–S277
.
You do not currently have access to this content.