Pocket damper seals perform a dual function: both sealing the pressurized gas around a rotating shaft and providing large amounts of vibration damping. The annular cavity between the labyrinth seal teeth is subdivided into separate annular cavities around the circumference of the rotor by partitioning walls. Also, the upstream and downstream teeth have different radial clearances to the rotor. These seals have been shown to provide a remarkable amount of direct damping to attenuate vibration in turbomachinery, but they generally leak more than conventional labyrinth seals if both seals have the same minimum clearance. Conversely, brush seals allow less than half the leakage of labyrinth seals, but published test results show no significant amount of damping. They are considered to be a primary choice for the seals in new aircraft engine designs because of their low leakage. This paper will describe a recently invented hybrid brush/pocket damper seal that combines high damping with low leakage. Previous brush seal results were studied and calculations were made to select a brush seal to combine with the pocket damper design. The result is a hybrid seal with high damping and low leakage. A special design feature can also allow active vibration control as a bonus benefit. A computer code written for the original pocket damper seal was modified to include the brush element at the exit blade. Results from the computer code indicate that the hybrid seal can have less leakage than a six bladed (or 6 knives) labyrinth seal along with orders of magnitude more damping. Experimental evaluations of the damping and leakage performance of the hybrid seal are being conducted by the authors. The experimental work reported here tested the damping capability of the new hybrid brush seal by exciting the seal journal through an impedance head. A conventional six-bladed labyrinth seal of the same working dimensions was also tested. The brush hybrid pocket damper seal is found to leak less than the labyrinth seal while producing two to three times more damping than the original pocket damper seal (orders of magnitude more than the conventional labyrinth). [S0742-4795(00)01102-9]

1.
Thomas
,
H.
,
1958
, “
Instabile Eigenschwingungen von Turbinenla¨ufern angefacht durch die Spaltstro¨mungen Stopfbuschen und Beschauflungen
,”
Bull de L’AIM
,
71
, pp.
1039
1063
.
2.
Alford
,
J. S.
,
1965
, “
Protecting Turbomachinery from Self-Excited Rotor Whirl
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
,
87
, pp.
333
344
.
3.
Childs, D. W., 1978, “The Space Shuttle Main Engine High Pressure Fuel Turbopump Rotordynamic Instability Problem,” ASME J. Eng. Power, Jan., pp. 48–57.
4.
Childs, D., 1993, Turbomachinery Rotordynamics, Phenomena, Modeling and Analysis, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
5.
Von Pragenau, G. L., 1992 “From Labyrinth Seals to Damping Seals/Bearings,” presented at the Fourth International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery (ISROMAC-4), Honolulu, Hawaii, pp. 277–285.
6.
Vance, J. and Schultz, R., 1993, “A New Damper Seal for Turbomachinery,” Vibration of Rotating Systems, ASME DE, 60, September 1993.
7.
Childs
,
D.
, and
Scharrer
,
J.
,
1988
, “
Theory versus Experiment for the Rotordynamic Coefficients of Labyrinth Gas Seals: Part II—A Comparison to Experiment
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
,
110
, pp.
281
287
.
8.
Vance, J. M., Zierer, J. J., and Conway, E. M., 1993, “Effect of Straight-Through Labyrinth Seals on Rotordynamics,” presented at the 1993 ASME Vibration and Noise Conference, Albuquerque, NM.
9.
Childs, D., and Vance, J., 1994, “Annular Seals as Tools to Control Rotordynamic Response of Future Gas Turbine Engines,” AIAA Paper 94-2804.
10.
Richards, R. L., Vance, J. M., Paquette, D. J., and Zeidan, F. Y, 1995, “Using a Damper Seal to Eliminate Subsynchronous Vibrations in Three Back to Back Compressors,” Proceedings of the 24th Turbomachinery Symposium, Houston, Texas, September 26–28, 1995, pp. 59–71.
11.
Ferguson, J. G., 1988, “Brushes as High Performance Gas Turbine Seals,” ASME Paper 88-GT-182.
12.
Chupp, R., Short, J., and Loewenthal, R., 1997, “Brush Seals: Lower Leakage Means Higher Efficiency,” Turbomachinery International, March/April, pp. 58–61.
13.
Conner, K., and Childs, D., 1990, “Rotordynamic Coefficient Test Results for a 4-Stage Brush Seal,” AIAA Paper No. 90-2139.
14.
Hendricks, R. C., Griffin, T. A., Kline, T. R., Csavina, K. R., Pancholi, A., Sood, D., 1994, “Relative Performance Comparison Between Baseline Labyrinth and Dual Brush Compressor Discharge Seals in a T-700 Engine Test,” presented at the International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, The Hague, Netherlands, June 13–16, ASME Paper 94-GT-266.
15.
Vance
,
J. M.
,
Cardon
,
B.
,
San Andre´s
,
L.
, and
Storace
,
A.
,
1993
, “
A Gas Operated Bearing Damper for Turbomachinery
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
115
, No.
2
, pp.
383
389
.
16.
Sundararajan
,
P.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
,
1995
, “
A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of a Gas Operated Bearing Damper for Turbomachinery: Part I—Theoretical Model and Predictions
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
117
, pp.
742
749
.
17.
Vance
,
J. M.
, and
Li
,
J.
,
1996
, “
Test Results of A New Damper Seal for Vibration Reduction in Turbomachinery
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
118
, No.
2
, pp.
843
846
.
18.
Ransom
,
D.
,
Li
,
J.
,
San Andre´s
,
L.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
,
1998
, “
Experimental Force Coefficients for a Two-Bladed Labyrinth Seal and a Four-Pocket Damper Seal
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
121
, No.
2
, pp.
370
376
.
19.
Li, J., 1999, “A Bulk Flow Model of Multiple-Blade, Multiple-Pocket Gas Damper Seals,” Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, May College Station, TX.
20.
Li
,
J.
,
Ransom
,
D.
,
San Andre´s
,
L.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
,
1998
, “
Comparison of Predictions With Test Results for Rotordynamic Coefficients of a Four-Pocket Gas Damper Seal
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
121
, No.
2
, pp.
363
369
.
21.
Wilcoxon Research, 1984, Operating Guide for the Model F4 Electromagnetic Shaker, Rockville, Maryland.
You do not currently have access to this content.