Santee Cooper (South Carolina Public Service Authority) experienced twenty-three tube failures in a high pressure feedwater heater that was in service less than three years. The tube failures were located at baffles adjacent to both exits of the dual flow desuperheater. Metallurgical analysis of the failed tubes indicated that stress corrosion cracking of the 304N stainless steel was the primary failure mode (Rudin, 1994; Shifter, 1994). The investigation to determine the factors leading to the onset of stress corrosion cracking included analysis of heater acceptance tests, the heater manufacturer’s proposal and manufacturing procedures, operational data, eddy current reports, metallurgical reports, and a heater design review for vibration and wet wall potential (formation of condensation on the outside diameter (OD) of the tube prior to the desuperheater exit).

1.
Catapano, M. C., 1995, “Winyah Generating Station Unit No. 2 Feedwater Heater No. 6,” technical report, Powerfect Power Plant Heat Transfer Consultants Inc., East Hanover, NJ.
2.
Minner, G. L., et al., 1993, PEPSE—Performance Evaluation of Power Systems Efficiencies, Software Version 61, Scientech, Idaho Falls, ID.
3.
Murdock, K., 1994, “Unit #2 Feedwater Heater #6,” Eddy Current Inspection Report No. 455-40178-03, Law Engineering Industrial Services, Charlotte, NC.
4.
Rudin, S. B., 1994, “Metallurgical Analysis of Feedwater Heater Tube Failures,” Metallurgical Reports No. 94-91395 and 94-91899, Midstates Analytical Laboratories, Inc., Tulsa, OK.
5.
Shifler, D. A., 1994, “Winyah Generating Station Unit No. 2-No. 6 High Pressure Heater Tube,” Metallurgical Report M-2821, Powell Laboratories LTD, Baltimore, MD.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.