Experiments were carried out to determine the pressure drop through an annular conduit filled with a plain square wire-mesh woven-screen matrix. The tests involved turbulent fully developed flow of air at steady-state conditions, with the modified Reynolds number (M(1−ε)/Re), based on the hydraulic radius of the packed bed, ranging from 5 × 10−4 to 5 × 10−3. The test section was built according to the geometry of a Stirling engine, simulating an annular regenerator with a radius ratio of 1.369 and a screen of mesh size 10. A corrected Ergun equation was used to correlate the experimental data, considering the wall effects. Comparisons with results obtained by other authors extended the validation of the correlation obtained to a wider range of modified Reynolds numbers (1 × 10−4 ≤ M(1 − ε)/Re ≤ 1) and to different screen mesh sizes. The correlation has been found to work for annular and circular cross-section beds.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Flow (Dynamics), Friction, Wire mesh, Reynolds number, Geometry, Pressure drop, Steady state, Stirling engines, Turbulence
1.
Armour
J. C.
, and
Cannon
J. N.
,
1968
, “
Fluid Flow through Woven Screens
,”
AIChE Journal
, Vol.
14
, No.
3
, pp.
415
–
420
.
2.
ASME, 1971, “Fluid Meters, their Theory and Application,” Report from the Research Committee on Fluid Meters, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 6th ed.
3.
Bartolini, C. M., and Naso, V., 1984, “Theoretical Predictions of the Performance of Stirling Engines Metallic Regenerators,” Proceedings, 2nd International Conference on Stirling Engines, Shangai, China.
4.
Bolz, R. E., and Tuve, G. L., 1976, Handbook of Tables for Applied Engineering Science, CRE Press, 2nd ed.
5.
Chang
W. S.
,
1990
, “
Porosity and Effective Thermal Conductivity of Wire Screens
,”
ASME Journal of Heat Transfer
, Vol.
112
, No.
1
, pp.
5
–
9
.
6.
Ergun
S.
,
1952
. “
Fluid Flow through Packed Columns
,”
Chemical Engineering Progress
, Vol.
48
, No.
2
, pp.
89
–
94
.
7.
Holman, J. P., 1994, Experimental Method for Engineers, McGraw-Hill, 6th ed., New York.
8.
Jones
J. D.
,
1988
, “
Flow Losses in Stirling Engine Heat Exchangers
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
, Vol.
110
, No.
1
, pp.
58
–
62
.
9.
Kays, W. M., and London, A. L., 1964, Compact Heat Exchangers, McGraw-Hill, New York.
10.
Kline
S. J.
, and
McClintock
F. A.
,
1953
, “
Describing Uncertainties in Single Sample Experiments
,”
Mechanical Engineering
, Vol.
75
, pp.
3
–
8
.
11.
Macdonald
I. F.
,
El-Sayed
M. S.
,
Mow
K.
, and
Dullien
F. A. C.
,
1979
, “
Flow through Porous Media—the Ergun Equation Revisited
,”
Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals
, Vol.
18
, No.
3
, pp.
199
–
208
.
12.
Mehta
D.
, and
Hawley
M. C.
,
1969
, “
Wall Effect in Packed Columns
,”
I&EC Process Design and Development
, Vol.
8
, No.
2
, pp.
280
–
282
.
13.
Reader, G. T., and Hooper, C., 1983, Stirling Engines, E. & F. N. Spon, London, Great Britain.
14.
Simon, T. W., and Seume, J. R., 1988, “A Survey of Oscillating Flow in Stirling Engine Heat Exchangers,” NASA Contractor Report 182108.
15.
Thonger, J. C. T., and Rice, G., 1986, “Regenerator Effectiveness and Fluid Friction Measurements,” Proceedings, 3rd International Stirling Engine Conference, Rome, Italy, Vol. I, pp. 335–349.
16.
Urieli, I., and Berchowitz, D. M., 1984, Stirling Cycle Engine Analysis, Adam Hilger Ltd., Bristol, Great Britain.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1997
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.