This study investigated normal heptane (N-heptane)-diesel combustion and odorous emissions in a direct injection diesel engine during and after engine warmup at idling. The odor is a little worse with N-heptane and blends than that of diesel fuel due to overleaning of the mixture. In addition, formaldehyde (HCHO) and total hydrocarbon (THC) in the exhaust increase with increasing N-heptane content. However, 50% and 100% N-heptane showed lower eye irritation than neat diesel fuel. Due to low boiling point of N-heptane, adhering fuel on the combustion chamber wall is small and as a single-component C7 fuel, relatively high volatile components present in the exhaust are low. This may cause lower eye irritation. On the contrary, bulk in-cylinder gas temperature is lower and ignition delay significantly increases for 50% and 100% N-heptane due to the low boiling point, high latent heat of evaporation, and low bulk modulus of compressibility of N-heptane than standard diesel fuel. This longer ignition delay and lower bulk in-cylinder gas temperature of N-heptane blends deteriorate exhaust odor and emissions of HCHO and THC.

1.
Ingram
,
C.
, 1978, “
Diesel Exhaust Odor of Small, High Speed, Direct Injection Engines
,” SAE Paper No. 780114.
2.
Tanaka
,
T.
,
Kobashi
,
K.
, and
Sami
,
H.
, 1992, “
Development of a Diesel Odor Measurement Method and Its Application to Odor Reduction
,” SAE Paper No. 920726.
3.
Roy
,
M. M.
,
Tsunemoto
,
H.
, and
Ishitani
,
H.
, 1999, “
Effect of Injection Timing and Fuel Properties on Exhaust Odor in DI Diesel Engines
,” SAE Paper No. 1999-01-1531.
4.
Weber
,
P. A.
,
Smith
,
L. R.
, and
Kubsh
,
J. E.
, 1992, “
Fuel Effects on Emissions From an Advanced Technology Vehicles
,” SAE Paper No. 922245.
5.
Mac Carthy
,
C. I.
,
Slodowske
,
W. J.
,
Sienicki
,
E. J.
, and
Jass
,
R. E.
, 1992, “
Diesel Fuel Property Effects on Exhaust Emissions From a Heavy Duty Diesel Engine That Meets 1994 Emissions Requirements
,” SAE Paper No. 922267.
6.
Roy
,
M. M.
,
Tsunemoto
,
H.
, and
Ishitani
,
H.
, 2000, “
Effect of MTBE and DME on Odorous Emissions in a DI Diesel Engine
,”
JSME Int. J., Ser. B
1340-8054,
43
(
3
), pp.
511
517
.
7.
Arima
,
T.
,
Obata
,
K.
,
Cao
,
G. H.
,
Ogawa
,
H.
, and
Miyamoto
,
N.
, 1996, “
Improvements to Diesel Combustion and Emissions by Oxygenated Agent Addition to Diesel Fuels-Influence of Diesel Fuels and Oxygenated Agent Properties
,”
Proceedings of JSAE (in Japanese)
, Paper No. 9637483, pp.
269
272
.
8.
Roy
,
M. M.
, 2005, “
Effect of n-Heptane and n-Decane on Exhaust Odour in Direct Injection Diesel Engines
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D (J. Automob. Eng.)
0954-4070,
219
(
4
), pp.
565
571
.
9.
Owkita
,
T.
, and
Shigeta
,
Y.
, 1972, “
Analysis Method of Low Concentration Gas and Bad Smell
,”
KOUDANNSYA
, pp.
117
215
, in Japanese.
10.
Roy
,
M. M.
, and
Tsunemoto
,
H.
, 2002, “
Investigation of Odorous Components and Improvement in Odor Assessment Procedure in DI Diesel Engines
,” SAE Paper No. 2002-01-2875.
11.
Boehman
,
A. L.
,
Morris
,
D.
,
Szybist
,
J.
, and
Esen
,
E.
, 2004, “
The Impact of the Bulk Modulus of Diesel Fuels on Fuel Injection Timing
,”
Energy Fuels
0887-0624,
18
, pp.
1877
1882
.
12.
Heywood
,
J. B.
, 1988,
Internal Combustion Engine Fundamental
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
, pp.
356
357
.
You do not currently have access to this content.