Fuel cell technology is a promising means of energy conversion. As the technology matures, process design and analysis are gaining importance. The conventional measures of fuel cell performance (i.e., gross real and voltage efficiencies) are limited indices-of- merit. Contemporary second law concepts (availability/exergy, irreversibility, exergetic efficiency) have been used to enhance fuel cell evaluation. A previously modeled solid oxide fuel cell has been analyzed using both conventional measures and the contemporary thermodynamic measures. Various cell irreversibilities were quantified, and their impact on cell inefficiency was better understood. Exergetic efficiency is more comprehensive than the conventional indices-of- performance. This parameter includes thermal irreversibilities, considers the value of effluent exergy, and has a consistent formulation. Usage of exergetic efficiency led to process design discoveries different from the trends observed in conjunction with the conventional efficiency measures. The decision variables analyzed were operating pressure, air stoichiometric number (inverse equivalence ratio), operating voltage and fuel utilization.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
solid oxide fuel cells, performance evaluation, irreversible thermodynamics, fuel cell power plants, engineering
Topics:
Exergy, Fuel cells, Fuels, Pressure, Solid oxide fuel cells, Heat transfer, Process design, Performance evaluation, Temperature
1.
Veyo, S. V., 1998, “Tubular SOFC Power System Operational Experience,” Abstracts of the 1998 Fuel Cells Seminar, Palm Springs, pp. 457-460.
2.
Rosen
,
M. A.
,
1990
, “
Comparison Based on Energy and Exergy Analyses of the Potential Cogeneration Efficiencies for Fuel Cells and Other Electricity Generation Devices
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
15
, No.
4
, pp.
267
–
274
.
3.
Harvey
,
S. P.
, and
Richter
,
H. J.
,
1994
, “
Gas Turbine Cycles With Solid Oxide Fuel Cells; Part II: A Detailed Study of a Gas Turbine Cycle With an Integrated Internal Reforming Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Technology
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
116
, pp.
312
–
318
.
4.
Dunbar
,
W. R.
,
Lior
,
N.
, and
Gaggioli
,
R. A.
,
1991
, “
Combining Fuel Cells with Fuel-Fired Power Plants for Improved Exergy Efficiency
,”
Energy (Oxford)
,
16
, No.
10
, pp.
1259
–
1274
.
5.
Dunbar
,
W. R.
,
Lior
,
N.
, and
Gaggioli
,
R. A.
,
1993
, “
The Effect of the Fuel-Cell Unit Size on the Efficiency of a Fuel-Cell-Topped Rankine Power Cycle
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
115
, pp.
105
–
107
.
6.
Gaggioli
,
R. A.
, and
Dunbar
,
W. R.
,
1993
, “
Emf, Maximum Power and Efficiency of Fuel Cells
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
115
, pp.
100
–
104
.
7.
Call
,
F. W.
,
1998
, “
Dispersion—An Entropy Generator of Diffusion
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
120
, pp.
149
–
152
.
1.
Haynes, C. L., and Wepfera, W. J., “‘Design for Power’ of a Commercial-Grade Tubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cell,” Energy Convers. Manage., 41, pp. 1123-1139;
2.
Erratum, 41, 2063–2067.
1.
Haynes, C. L., and Wepferb, W. J., 2000, “Characterizing Heat Transfer within a Commercial-Grade Tubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cell for Enhanced Thermal Management,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, accepted for publication.
2.
Appleby, A. J., 1993, “Characteristics of Fuel Cell Systems,” Fuel Cell Systems, L. J. M. J. Blomen and M. N. Mugerwa, eds., Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp. 157–200.
3.
Hirschenhofer, J. H., Stauffer, D. B., and Engelman, R. R., 1994, Fuel Cells, A Handbook (Revision 3), DOE/METC-94/1006, United States Department of Energy, Morgantown, VA.
4.
Mugerwa, M. N., and Blomen, L. J. M. J., 1993, “System Design and Optimization,” Fuel Cell Systems, L. J. M. J. Blomen and M. N. Mugerwa, eds., Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp. 216–219.
5.
Jones, J. B., and Dugan, R. E., 1996, Engineering Thermodynamics, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, p. 729.
6.
Moran, M. J., and Shapiro, H. N., 1992, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, pp. 289–296.
7.
Barendrecht, E., 1993, “Electrochemistry of Fuel Cells,” Fuel Cell Systems, L. J. M. J. Blomen and M. N. Mugerwa, eds., Plenum Press, New York, NY, p. 76.
8.
Prentice, G., 1991, Electrochemical Engineering Principles, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, p. 14.
9.
Bejan, A., Tsatsaronis, G., and Moran, M., 1996, Thermal Design and Optimization, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
10.
Ratjke
,
S. K.
, and
Moller-Holst
,
S.
,
1993
, “
Exergy Efficiency and Local Heat Production in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
,”
Electrochim. Acta
,
38
, No.
2/3
, pp.
447
–
453
.
11.
Minh, T. Q., and Takahashi, T., 1995, Science and Technology of Ceramic Fuel Cells, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Holland. pp. 22–23.
12.
Maskalick, N. J., 1989, “Design and Performance of Tubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” Proc. First International Symposium on Solid Oxide Fuel Cells, Hollywood, FL.
13.
Dunbar
,
W. R.
, and
Gaggioli
,
R. A.
,
1990
, “
Computer Simulation of Solid Electrolyte Fuel Cells
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
112
, pp.
114
–
123
.
14.
Haynes, C. L., 1999, Simulation of Tubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Behavior for Integration into Gas Turbine Cycles, Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology.
15.
George
,
R. A.
, and
Bessette
,
N. F.
,
1998
, “
Reducing the Manufacturing Cost of Tubular SOFC Technology
,”
J. Power Sources
,
71
, pp.
131
–
137
.
16.
Federal Energy Technology Center, 1999, “Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Project: Generating Tomorrow’s Electricity Cleanly,” Project Facts: Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, Federal Energy Technology Center, Federal Energy Technology Center, Morgantown, VA.
17.
Demin
,
A. K.
,
Alderucci
,
V.
,
Ielo
,
I.
,
Fadeev
,
G. I.
,
Maggio
,
G.
,
Giordano
,
N.
, and
Antonucci
,
V.
,
1992
, “
Thermodynamic Analysis of Methane Fueled Solid Oxide Fuel Cell System
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
17
, No.
6
, pp.
451
–
458
.
Copyright © 2002
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.