A general fatigue life prediction methodology, based on a unified creep plasticity damage (UCPD) model, was developed for predicting fatigue cracks in 95.5Sn–3.9Ag–0.6Cu (wt %) solder interconnects. The methodology was developed from isothermal fatigue tests using a double-lap-shear specimen. Finite element analysis model geometries, mesh densities, and assumptions were detailed for both a full model (an octant-symmetry slice of the entire ball grid array (BGA) assembly) and a submodel (the solder joint deemed most likely to fail and the surrounding package layers) to facilitate fatigue prediction. Model validation was based on the thermal mechanical fatigue of plastic BGA solder joints (250–4000 thermal cycles, , and ). Metallographic cross sections were used to quantitatively measure crack development. The methodology generally underpredicted the crack lengths but, nonetheless, captured the measured crack lengths within a error band. Possible shortcomings in the methodology, including inaccurate materials properties and part geometries, as well as computational techniques, are discussed in terms of improving both the UCPD constitutive model and the fatigue life prediction methodology fidelity and decreasing the solution time.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 2008
Research Papers
Validation of a General Fatigue Life Prediction Methodology for Sn–Ag–Cu Lead-Free Solder Alloy Interconnects
David M. Pierce,
David M. Pierce
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Stanford University
, Stanford, CA 94305
Search for other works by this author on:
Sheri D. Sheppard,
Sheri D. Sheppard
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Stanford University
, Stanford, CA 94305
Search for other works by this author on:
Paul T. Vianco,
Paul T. Vianco
Sandia National Laboratories
, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Search for other works by this author on:
Jerome A. Regent,
Jerome A. Regent
Sandia National Laboratories
, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Mark Grazier
J. Mark Grazier
Sandia National Laboratories
, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Search for other works by this author on:
David M. Pierce
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Stanford University
, Stanford, CA 94305
Sheri D. Sheppard
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Stanford University
, Stanford, CA 94305
Paul T. Vianco
Sandia National Laboratories
, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Jerome A. Regent
Sandia National Laboratories
, Albuquerque, NM 87185
J. Mark Grazier
Sandia National Laboratories
, Albuquerque, NM 87185J. Electron. Packag. Mar 2008, 130(1): 011003 (12 pages)
Published Online: January 31, 2008
Article history
Received:
October 13, 2006
Revised:
July 19, 2007
Published:
January 31, 2008
Citation
Pierce, D. M., Sheppard, S. D., Vianco, P. T., Regent, J. A., and Grazier, J. M. (January 31, 2008). "Validation of a General Fatigue Life Prediction Methodology for Sn–Ag–Cu Lead-Free Solder Alloy Interconnects." ASME. J. Electron. Packag. March 2008; 130(1): 011003. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2837515
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Impact of Encapsulated Phase Change Material Additives for Improved Thermal Performance of Silicone Gel Insulation
J. Electron. Packag (December 2024)
Special Issue on InterPACK2023
J. Electron. Packag
Extreme Drop Durability of Sintered Silver Traces Printed With Extrusion and Aerosol Jet Processes
J. Electron. Packag (December 2024)
Related Articles
A Global–Local Approach for Mechanical Deformation and Fatigue
Durability of Microelectronic Packaging Systems
J. Electron. Packag (June,2007)
A General Methodology to Predict Fatigue Life in Lead-Free Solder Alloy Interconnects
J. Electron. Packag (March,2009)
Isothermal Cyclic Bend Fatigue Test Method for Lead-Free Solder Joints
J. Electron. Packag (December,2007)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Introductory Information
The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, Third Edition
Start-Up, Shutdown, and Lay-Up
Consensus on Pre-Commissioning Stages for Cogeneration and Combined Cycle Power Plants
Fatigue Crack Growth, Fatigue, and Stress Corrosion Crack Growth: Section XI Evaluation
Online Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes