This paper examines modeling of the laminar dynamic fluid responses within hydraulic transmission lines that have a tapered shape between the inlet and the outlet. There are excellent models available for fast simulation of pressure and flow dynamics within uniform lines; however, the established models for tapered lines either cannot be implemented in the time domain, are complex to implement, or have long simulation times. The enhanced transmission line method (TLM) structure is applied in this paper since it can be computed quickly in the time domain and has shown to accurately model the effects of frequency-dependent friction. This paper presents a method of optimizing the TLM weighting functions, minimizing the error between the TLM transmission matrix terms and a numerical ordinary differential equation (ODE) solution calculated using a boundary value solver. Optimizations have shown that using the TLM to model tapered lines can provide a fair approximation when compared in the frequency domain. Two-dimensional (2D) interpolation of a look-up table is possible allowing for quick selection of the optimized parameters. Further investigation into the effects of pipe wall elasticity and its inclusion into the TLM is also performed. Also, an experiment was performed to validate high frequency harmonic peaks present in the frequency response, which yielded acceptable results when compared to the theory, and the proposed tapered TLM. This model can be used in numerous applications where line dynamic effects must be accounted for, especially with digital hydraulic switched inertance converters where high frequencies are present.

References

1.
Krus
,
P.
,
Weddfelt
,
K.
, and
Palmberg
,
J. O.
,
1994
, “
Fast Pipeline Models for Simulation of Hydraulic Systems
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control
,
116
(
1
), pp.
132
136
.
2.
Johnston
,
N.
,
2012
, “
The Transmission Line Method for Modelling Laminar Flow of Liquid in Pipelines
,”
J. Syst. Control Eng.
,
226
(
5
), pp.
586
597
.
3.
Johnston
,
N.
,
Pan
,
M.
, and
Kudzma
,
S.
,
2014
, “
An Enhanced Transmission Line Method for Modelling Laminar Flow of Liquid in Pipelines
,”
J. Syst. Control Eng.
,
228
(
4
), pp.
193
206
.
4.
Zielke
,
W.
,
1968
, “
Frequency-Dependent Friction in Transient Pipe Flow
,”
ASME J. Basic Eng.
,
90
(
1
), pp.
109
115
.
5.
Muto
,
T.
,
Kinoshita
,
Y.
, and
Yoneda
,
R.
,
1981
, “
Dynamic Response of Tapered Fluid Lines (1st Report, Transfer Matrix and Frequency Response)
,”
Bull. JSME
,
24
(
191
), pp.
809
815
.
6.
Tahmeen
,
M.
,
Muto
,
T.
, and
Yamada
,
H.
,
2001
, “
Simulation of Dynamic Responses of Tapered Fluid Lines
,”
JSME Int. J., Ser. B
,
44
(
2
), pp.
247
254
.
7.
Viersma
,
T. J.
,
1980
, “
Analysis, Synthesis and Design of Hydraulic Servosystems and Pipelines
,”
Studies in Mechanical Engineering
, Vol.
1
,
Elsevier Science Ltd
., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
8.
Washio
,
S.
,
Konishi
,
T.
, and
Okamura
,
K.
,
1974
, “
Research on Wave Phenomena in Hydraulic Lines: 2nd Report, Unsteady Liquid Flow in a Tapered Pipe
,”
Bull. JSME
,
17
(
111
), pp.
1165
1171
.
9.
Wiens
,
T.
,
2015
, “
Analysis and Mitigation of Valve Switching Losses in Switched Inertance Converters
,”
ASME
Paper No. FPMC2015-9600.
10.
Krus
,
P.
,
Jansson
,
A.
,
Palmberg
,
J.
, and
Weddfelt
,
K.
,
1990
, “
Distributed Simulation of Hydromechanical Systems
,”
Third Bath International Fluid Power Workshop
, Bath, UK, pp. 228–250.
11.
Johnston
,
N.
,
2014
, “
Simulink Models
,” University of Bath, Bath, UK, accessed July 3, 2018, http://people.bath.ac.uk/ensdnj/models/newtlm.html
12.
ven der Buhs
,
J.
, and
Wiens
,
T.
,
2017
, “
Transmission Line Models
,” Linköping, Sweden, accessed July 3, 2018 https://github.com/tkw954/usask_tlm
13.
Ghidaoui
,
M. S.
,
Zhao
,
M.
,
McInnis
,
D. A.
, and
Axworthy
,
D. H.
,
2005
, “
A Review of Water Hammer Theory and Practice
,”
ASME Appl. Mech. Rev.
,
58
(
1
), pp.
49
76
.
14.
D'Souza
,
A. F.
, and
Oldenburger
,
R.
,
1964
, “
Dynamic Response of Fluid Lines
,”
ASME J. Basic Eng.
,
86
(
3
), pp.
589
598
.
15.
Wiens
,
T.
,
2009
, “
Kasami Sequences, m-Sequences, Linear Feedback Shift Registers
,” MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, accessed July 3, 2018, https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/22716
16.
Koopman
,
P.
, 1998, “
Maximal Length LFSR Feedback Terms
,” Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, accessed July 3, 2018, https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/lfsr/index.html
You do not currently have access to this content.