Stabilization of linear systems by state feedback is an important problem of the controller design. The design of observers with appropriate error dynamics is a dual problem. This duality leads, at first glance, to the equivalence of the responses in the synthesized systems. This is true for the time-invariant case, but may not hold for time-varying systems. We limit ourselves in this work by the situation when the system itself is time invariant, and only the gains are time varying. The possibility of assigning a rapidly decaying response without peaking is analyzed. The solution of this problem for observers using time-varying gains is presented. Then we show that this result cannot be obtained for state feedback controllers. We also analyze the conditions under which the observer error dynamics and the response of the closed loop time-varying controllers are equivalent. Finally we compare our results to recently proposed observer converging in finite time and Riccati-based continuous observer with limited overshoots.

1.
Kalman
,
R.
, 1960, “
A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems
,”
Trans. ASME. Ser. D, Basic. Eng.
,
82
, pp.
35
45
.
2.
Willems
,
J. C.
, and
Mitter
,
S. K.
, 1971, “
Observability, Pole Allocation and State Reconstruction
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
0018-9286,
AC-16
, pp.
424
440
.
3.
Kwakernaak
,
H.
, and
Sivan
,
R.
, 1972,
Linear Optimal Control Systems
,
Wiley
, New York.
4.
Krener
,
A.
, and
Isidori
,
A.
, 1983, “
Linearization by Output Injection and Nonlinear Observers
,”
Syst. Control Lett.
0167-6911,
3
, pp.
47
52
.
5.
Polotsky
,
V.
, 1980, “
Estimation of the State of Single Output Linear Systems by Means of Observers
,”
Autom. Remote Control (Engl. Transl.)
0005-1179,
12
, pp.
1640
1648
.
6.
Francis
,
B.
, and
Glover
,
K.
, 1978, “
Bounded Peaking in the Optimal Regulator with Cheap Control
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
0018-9286,
AC-23
, pp.
608
617
.
7.
Sussman
,
H.
, and
Kokotovic
,
P.
, 1991, “
The Peaking Phenomenon and the Global Stabilization of Nonlinear Systems
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
0018-9286,
AC-36
, pp.
424
440
.
8.
Esfandiary
,
F.
, and
Khalil
,
H.
, 1992, “
Output Feedback Stabilization of Fully Linearizable Systems
,”
Int. J. Control
0020-7179,
56
, pp.
1007
10037
.
9.
Dabroom
,
A.
, and
Khalil
,
H.
, 2001, “
Output Feedback Sampled-Data Control of Nonlinear Systems Using High-Gains Observer
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
0018-9286,
AC-47
, pp.
17
œ2-
1725
.
10.
Engel
,
R.
, and
Kreisselmer
,
G.
, 2002, “
A Continuous-Time Observer Which Converges in Finite Time
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
0018-9286,
AC-47
, pp.
1202
1204
.
11.
Chitour
,
Y.
, 2002, “
Time-Varying High-Gain Observer for Numerical Differentiations
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
0018-9286,
AC-47
, pp.
1565
1569
.
12.
Polotski
,
V.
, 1996, “
Time-Varying State Feedback and Output Injection: Duality and Distinctions
,” in
Proc. 36th CDC
, pp.
2540
2546
.
13.
Polotski
,
V.
, 1999, “
Commuting with the Matriciant does not Imply Commuting with the Integral
,” in
Proc. ACC99
.
14.
Gantmacher
,
F. R.
, 1960,
Matrix Theory
,
Chelsea
, NY, Vols.
1
and
2
.
15.
Brockett
,
R.
, 1970,
Finite Dimensional Linear Systems
,
Wiley
, New York.
16.
T. Kailath
,
T.
, 1980,
Linear Systems
,
Prentice Hall
, NY.
17.
Morosov
,
V. M.
, and
Kalenova
,
V. I.
, 1995, “
The Reducibility Theory of Linear Time-Varying Control Systems and its Applications to Mechanical and Technical Problems
,” in
Proc. 34th CDC
, pp.
2511
2514
.
18.
Zhu
,
J.
, 1995, “
A Unified Theory for Linear Tyme-Varying Systems—Progress and Challenges
,” in
Proc. 34th CDC
, pp.
2540
2546
.
19.
D’Angello
,
H.
, 1970,
Linear Time-Varying systems: Analysis and Synthesis
, Boston.
You do not currently have access to this content.