A new approach to optimal control of vehicle suspension systems, incorporating actuator time delay, is presented. The inclusion of time delay provides a more realistic model for the actuators, and the problem is viewed from a different perspective rather than the conventional optimal control techniques. The objective here is to select a set of feedback gains such that the maximum vertical acceleration of the sprung mass is minimized, over a wide band frequency range and when subjected to certain constraints. The constraints are dictated by the vehicle stability characteristics and the physical bounds placed on the feedback gains. Utilizing a Simple Quarter Car model, the constrained optimization is then carried out in the frequency domain with the road irregularities described as random processes. Due to the presence of the actuator time delay, the characteristic equation is found to be transcendental rather than algebraic, which makes the stability analysis relatively complex. A new scheme for the stability chart strategy with fixed time delay is introduced in order to address the stability issue. The stability characteristics are also verified utilizing other conventional methods such as the Michailov technique. Results demonstrate that the suspension system, when considering the effect of the actuator time delay, exhibits a completely different behavior.

1.
Esmailzadeh
,
E.
,
1978
, “
Design Synthesis of a Vehicle Suspension System Using Multi-Parameter Optimization
,”
Veh. Syst. Dyn.
,
7
, pp.
83
96
.
2.
Hrovat
,
D.
,
1993
, “
Applications of Optimal Control to Advances Automotive Suspension Design
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
,
115
, No.
2
, pp.
328
342
.
3.
Esmailzadeh
,
E.
, and
Bateni
,
H.
,
1992
, “
Optimal Active Vehicle Suspensions with Full State Feedback Control
,”
SAE Trans.
,
101
, No.
2
, pp.
784
795
.
4.
Thompson, A. G., 1979, “An optimal suspension for an Automobile on a Random Road,” SAE Paper No. 790478.
5.
Chalasani, R. M., 1986, “Ride Performance Potentials of Active Suspension Systems, Part III,” Symposium on Simulation and Control of Ground Vehicles and Transportation Systems, ASME Monograph, AMD, Vol. 80, DSC Vol. 1, pp. 205–234.
6.
Esmailzadeh
,
E.
, and
Taghirad
,
H. D.
,
1998
, “
Active Vehicle Suspensions with Optimal State Feedback Control
,”
Int. J. Model. Simul.
,
18
, No.
3
, pp.
228
239
.
7.
Thompson
,
A. G.
,
1984
, “
Optimal and Suboptimal Linear Active Suspensions for Road Vehicles
,”
Veh. Syst. Dyn.
,
13
, pp.
61
72
.
8.
Hall
,
B. B.
, and
Gill
,
K. F.
,
1987
, “
Performance Evaluation of Motor Vehicle Active Suspension Systems
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.
,
201
, No.
D2
, pp.
135
148
.
9.
Esmailzadeh
,
E.
,
1979
, “
Servo-Valve Controlled Pneumatic Suspensions
,”
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
,
21
, No.
1
, pp.
7
18
.
10.
Pontryagin
,
L.
,
1955
, “
On the Zeros of Some Elementary Transcendental Functions
,”
Trans. Am. Math. Soc.
,
2
, pp.
95
110
.
11.
Krall, A. M., 1967, Stability Techniques for Continuous Linear Systems, Gordon and Breach, Science, New York.
12.
Olgac
,
N.
,
Elmali
,
H.
,
Hosek
,
M.
, and
Renzulli
,
M.
,
1997
, “
Active Vibration Control of Disturbed Systems Using Delayed Resonator with Acceleration Feedback
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
,
119
, pp.
380
388
.
13.
Olgac
,
N.
, and
Holm-Hansen
,
B.
,
1994
, “
A Novel Active Vibration Absorption Technique: Delayed Resonator
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
176
, pp.
93
104
.
14.
Olgac
,
N.
, and
Jalili
,
N.
,
1998
, “
Modal Analysis of Flexible Beams with Delayed-Resonator Vibration Absorber: Theory and Experiments
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
218
, No.
2
, pp.
307
331
.
15.
Jalili
,
N.
, and
Olgac
,
N.
,
2000
, “
A Sensitivity Study of Optimum Delayed Feedback Vibration Absorber
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
,
122
, pp.
314
321
.
16.
Esmailzadeh
,
E.
, and
Fahimi
,
F.
,
1997
, “
Optimal Adaptive Active Suspensions for a Full Car Model
,”
Veh. Syst. Dyn.
,
27
, pp.
89
107
.
17.
Hertz
,
D.
,
Jury
,
E. I.
, and
Zeheb
,
E.
,
1984
, “
Simplified Analytic Stability Test for Systems with Commensurate Time Delays
,”
IEE Proc.-D: Control Theory Appl.
,
131
, No.
1
,Pt(D) pp.
52
56
.
18.
Popov, E. P., 1962, The Dynamics of Automatic Control Systems, Pergamon NY.
19.
Stepan, G., 1989, Retarded Dynamical Systems: Stability and Characteristic Functions, Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, Longman Scientific and Technical.
20.
Olgac
,
N.
, and
Jalili
,
N.
,
1999
, “
Optimal Delayed Feedback Vibration Absorber for Flexible Beams
,”
Smart Struct.
,
65
, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.
237
246
.
21.
Kolmanovski, V. B. and Nosov, V. R., 1989, Stability of Functional Differential Equations, Academic Press, London, Great Britain.
22.
Ackermann J., 1993, Robust Control, Systems with Uncertain Physical Parameters, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
23.
Filipovic
,
D.
, and
Olgac
,
N.
,
1998
, “
Torsional Delayed Resonator with Velocity Feedback
,”
IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron.
,
3
, pp.
67
72
.
24.
MATLAB/SIMULINK, version 5.3, Release R11, 1999, The Math Works Inc., MA.
25.
Thowsen
,
A.
,
1982
, “
Delay-independent Asymptotic Stability of Linear Systems
,”
IEE Proceedings Part D, Control Theory and Applications
,
129
, No.
3
, pp.
73
75
.
26.
Macdonald, N., 1989, Biological Delay Systems: Linear Stability Theory, Cambridge University Press, New York.
27.
Arora, J. S., 1989, Introduction to Optimum Design, McGraw-Hill, NY.
28.
Gill, P. E., Murray, W., and Wright, M. H., 1981, Practical Optimization, Academic Press, New York.
29.
Haleo
,
J. K.
, and
Infante
,
E. F.
,
1985
, “
Stability in Linear Delay Equations
,”
J. Math. Anal. Appl.
,
105
, pp.
533
555
.
You do not currently have access to this content.