Graphical Abstract Figure
Graphical Abstract Figure
Close modal

Abstract

The rise of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) applications, epitomized by ChatGPT, has reshaped design processes by enhancing idea generation and conceptual depth for designers. However, the facilitating effects on novice designers' thinking remain uncertain, particularly in the context of sustainable service concept generation. This study examines these impacts of ChatGPT on design thinking process and outcomes through controlled experiments with 36 novice designers with ChatGPT, Tiangong AI, and no tools under a sustainable service design task. Through the protocol analysis, this study visualizes the design thinking by network-based cognitive maps, then evaluates design outcomes and systematically analyzes characteristics of design thinking development under different tool interventions. Findings indicate that ChatGPT enhances design concept novelty and systematicity but has limited impact on originality and sustainability. Furthermore, ChatGPT plays an active role in fostering thinking divergence and fluency, especially in providing relevant guides for developed ideas and accelerating the evaluation and creation process. The network-based cognitive maps reveal distinct shifts and styles influenced by ChatGPT, providing references for novice designers using such tools to enhance inspiration and design fluency, and also effectively employ diverse tools during specific concept generation stage. The study also provides insights for enhancing the relevance of educational curricula and enabling bottom-up sustainable service innovations.

References

1.
Muller
,
M.
,
Chilton
,
L. B.
,
Kantosalo
,
A.
,
Martin
,
C. P.
, and
Walsh
,
G.
, “
GenAICHI: Generative AI and HCI
,”
Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts
,
New Orleans, LA
,
Apr. 29–May 5
, pp.
1
7
.
2.
Han
,
A.
, and
Cai
,
Z.
, “
Design Implications of Generative AI Systems for Visual Storytelling for Young Learners
,”
Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference
,
Chicago, IL
,
June 19–23
, pp.
470
474
.
3.
Schmidt
,
A.
,
Elagroudy
,
P.
,
Draxler
,
F.
,
Kreuter
,
F.
, and
Welsch
,
R.
,
2024
, “
Simulating the Human in HCD With ChatGPT: Redesigning Interaction Design With AI
,”
Interactions
,
31
(
1
), pp.
24
31
.
4.
Cai
,
A.
,
Rick
,
S. R.
,
Heyman
,
J. L.
,
Zhang
,
Y.
,
Filipowicz
,
A.
,
Hong
,
M.
,
Klenk
,
M.
, and
Malone
,
T.
, “
DesignAID: Using Generative AI and Semantic Diversity for Design Inspiration
,”
Proceedings of The ACM Collective Intelligence Conference
,
Delft, Netherlands
,
Nov. 6–9
, pp.
1
11
.
5.
Zhou
,
C.
,
Zhang
,
X.
, and
Yu
,
C.
,
2023
, “
How Does AI Promote Design Iteration? The Optimal Time to Integrate AI Into the Design Process
,”
J. Eng. Des.
,
34
(
12
), pp.
1
28
.
6.
Klockmann
,
V.
,
von Schenk
,
A.
, and
Villeval
,
M. C.
,
2022
, “
Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Intergenerational Responsibility
,”
J. Econ. Behav. Organ.
,
203
, pp.
284
317
.
7.
Rane
,
N.
,
2023
, “
Roles and Challenges of ChatGPT and Similar Generative Artificial Intelligence for Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
,” SSRN 4603244.
8.
Prasad Agrawal
,
K.
,
2023
, “
Organizational Sustainability of Generative AI-Driven Optimization Intelligence
,”
J. Comput. Inf. Syst.
, pp.
1
15
.
9.
Ooi
,
K.-B.
,
Tan
,
G. W.-H.
,
Al-Emran
,
M.
,
Al-Sharafi
,
M. A.
,
Capatina
,
A.
,
Chakraborty
,
A.
,
Dwivedi
,
Y. K.
, et al
,
2023
, “
The Potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence Across Disciplines: Perspectives and Future Directions
,”
J. Comput. Inf. Syst.
, pp.
1
32
.
10.
Alasadi
,
E. A.
, and
Baiz
,
C. R.
,
2023
, “
Generative AI in Education and Research: Opportunities, Concerns, and Solutions
,”
J. Chem. Educ.
,
100
(
8
), pp.
2965
2971
.
11.
Simon
,
H. A.
,
1969
, “
The Science of the Artificial
,”
Emotion Rev.
,
4
(
1
), pp.
266
268
.
12.
Gero
,
J. S.
, and
Milovanovic
,
J.
,
2020
, “
A Framework for Studying Design Thinking Through Measuring Designers' Minds, Bodies and Brains
,”
Des. Sci.
,
6
, pp.
e19
.
13.
Van Someren
,
M.
,
Barnard
,
Y. F.
, and
Sandberg
,
J.
,
1994
,
The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Approach to Modelling Cognitive
, Vol. 11, No. 6,
Academic Press
,
London
, pp.
19
30
.
14.
Kruger
,
C.
, and
Cross
,
N.
,
2006
, “
Solution Driven Versus Problem Driven Design: Strategies and Outcomes
,”
Des. Stud.
,
27
(
5
), pp.
527
548
.
15.
Tang
,
H.-H.
,
Lee
,
Y. Y.
, and
Gero
,
J. S.
,
2011
, “
Comparing Collaborative Co-Located and Distributed Design Processes in Digital and Traditional Sketching Environments: A Protocol Study Using the Function–Behaviour–Structure Coding Scheme
,”
Des. Stud.
,
32
(
1
), pp.
1
29
.
16.
Dorst
,
K.
,
2004
, “
On the Problem of Design Problems-Problem Solving and Design Expertise
,”
J. Des. Res.
,
4
(
2
), pp.
185
196
.
17.
Yu
,
R.
, and
Gero
,
J. S.
,
2016
, “
An Empirical Basis for the Use of Design Patterns by Architects in Parametric Design
,”
Int. J. Archit. Comput.
,
14
(
3
), pp.
289
302
.
18.
Hou
,
G.
, and
Lu
,
G.
,
2019
, “
The Influence of Design Proposal Viewing Strategy: Design Aesthetics and Professional Background
,”
Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ.
,
29
(
3
), pp.
543
564
.
19.
Zou
,
N.
,
Zhang
,
X.
,
Lou
,
J.
,
Liao
,
J.
, and
Chai
,
C.
,
2024
, “
Exploring the Precedents Retrieval Styles of Industrial and Mechanical Design Students During Brainstorming
,”
Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ.
,
34
(
1
), pp.
57
73
.
20.
Filippi
,
S.
,
2023
, “
Measuring the Impact of ChatGPT on Fostering Concept Generation in Innovative Product Design
,”
Electronics
,
12
(
16
), pp.
3535
.
21.
Buonamici
,
F.
,
Carfagni
,
M.
,
Furferi
,
R.
,
Volpe
,
Y.
, and
Governi
,
L.
,
2020
, “
Generative Design: an Explorative Study
,”
Comput.-Aided Des. Appl.
,
18
(
1
), pp.
144
155
.
22.
Elgammal
,
A.
,
2019
, “
AI is Blurring the Definition of Artist: Advanced Algorithms Are Using Machine Learning to Create Art Autonomously
,”
Am. Sci.
,
107
(
1
), pp.
18
22
.
23.
Chan
,
J.
,
Dow
,
S. P.
, and
Schunn
,
C. D.
,
2015
, “
Do the Best Design Ideas (Really) Come From Conceptually Distant Sources of Inspiration?
Des. Stud.
,
36
, pp.
31
58
.
24.
Goel
,
T.
,
Shaer
,
O.
,
Delcourt
,
C.
,
Gu
,
Q.
, and
Cooper
,
A.
, “
Preparing Future Designers for Human-AI Collaboration in Persona Creation
,”
Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work
,
Oldenburg, Germany
,
June 13–16
, pp.
1
14
.
25.
Kim
,
J.
, and
Maher
,
M. L.
,
2023
, “
The Effect of AI-Based Inspiration on Human Design Ideation
,”
Int. J. Des. Creat. Innov.
,
11
(
2
), pp.
81
98
.
26.
Kwon
,
E.
,
Huang
,
F.
, and
Goucher-Lambert
,
K.
,
2022
, “
Enabling Multi-Modal Search for Inspirational Design Stimuli Using Deep Learning
,”
AI EDAM
,
36
, pp.
e22
.
27.
Kasneci
,
E.
,
Seßler
,
K.
,
Küchemann
,
S.
,
Bannert
,
M.
,
Dementieva
,
D.
,
Fischer
,
F.
,
Gasser
,
U.
, et al
,
2023
, “
ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education
,”
Learn. Individ. Differ.
,
103
, pp.
102274
.
28.
Wu
,
R.
, and
Yu
,
Z.
,
2024
, “
Do AI Chatbots Improve Students Learning Outcomes? Evidence From a Meta-Analysis
,”
Br. J. Educ. Technol.
,
55
(
1
), pp.
10
33
.
29.
Tlili
,
A.
,
Shehata
,
B.
,
Adarkwah
,
M. A.
,
Bozkurt
,
A.
,
Hickey
,
D. T.
,
Huang
,
R.
, and
Agyemang
,
B.
,
2023
, “
What If the Devil Is My Guardian Angel: ChatGPT as a Case Study of Using Chatbots in Education
,”
Smart Learn. Environ.
,
10
(
1
), pp.
15
.
30.
Wang
,
X.
,
Anwer
,
N.
,
Dai
,
Y.
, and
Liu
,
A.
,
2023
, “
ChatGPT for Design, Manufacturing, and Education
,”
Procedia CIRP
,
119
, pp.
7
14
.
31.
Hu
,
X.
,
Tian
,
Y.
,
Nagato
,
K.
,
Nakao
,
M.
, and
Liu
,
A.
,
2023
, “
Opportunities and Challenges of ChatGPT for Design Knowledge Management
,”
Procedia CIRP
,
119
, pp.
21
28
.
32.
Exintaris
,
B.
,
Karunaratne
,
N.
, and
Yuriev
,
E.
,
2023
, “
Metacognition and Critical Thinking: Using ChatGPT-Generated Responses as Prompts for Critique in a Problem-Solving Workshop (SMARTCHEMPer)
,”
J. Chem. Educ.
,
100
(
8
), pp.
2972
2980
.
33.
Hák
,
T.
,
Janoušková
,
S.
, and
Moldan
,
B.
,
2016
, “
Sustainable Development Goals: A Need for Relevant Indicators
,”
Ecol. Indic.
,
60
, pp.
565
573
.
34.
Calabrese
,
A.
,
Costa
,
R.
,
Ghiron
,
N. L.
,
Tiburzi
,
L.
, and
Pedersen
,
E. R. G.
,
2021
, “
How Sustainable-Orientated Service Innovation Strategies Are Contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals
,”
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
,
169
, pp.
120816
.
35.
Cook
,
L. S.
,
Bowen
,
D. E.
,
Chase
,
R. B.
,
Dasu
,
S.
,
Stewart
,
D. M.
, and
Tansik
,
D. A.
,
2002
, “
Human Issues in Service Design
,”
J. Oper. Manage.
,
20
(
2
), pp.
159
174
.
36.
Aksoy
,
L.
,
Alkire
,
L.
,
Choi
,
S.
,
Kim
,
P. B.
, and
Zhang
,
L.
,
2019
, “
Social Innovation in Service: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda
,”
J. Serv. Manag.
,
30
(
3
), pp.
429
448
.
37.
Chowdhury
,
M. M. H.
, and
Quaddus
,
M. A.
,
2016
, “
A Multi-Phased QFD Based Optimization Approach to Sustainable Service Design
,”
Int. J. Prod. Econ.
,
171
, pp.
165
178
.
38.
Vezzoli
,
C.
,
Ceschin
,
F.
,
Diehl
,
J. C.
, and
Kohtala
,
C.
,
2015
, “
New Design Challenges to Widely Implement 'Sustainable Product–Service Systems
',”
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
97
, pp.
1
12
.
39.
J. Luca
,
E.
, and
Ulyannikova
,
Y.
,
2020
, “
Towards a User-Centred Systematic Review Service: The Transformative Power of Service Design Thinking
,”
J. Aust. Libr. Inf. Assoc.
,
69
(
3
), pp.
357
374
.
40.
Xie
,
X.
,
2023
, “
The Cognitive Process of Creative Design: A Perspective of Divergent Thinking
,”
Think. Ski. Creat.
,
48
, pp.
101266
.
41.
Hay
,
L.
,
McTeague
,
C.
,
Duffy
,
A. H.
,
Pidgeon
,
L. M.
,
Vuletic
,
T.
, and
Grealy
,
M.
,
2017
, “
A Systematic Review of Protocol Studies on Conceptual Design Cognition
,”
Des. Comput. Cogn.
,
16
, pp.
135
153
.
42.
Panwar
,
T.
, and
Khan
,
K.
,
2021
, “
Integrating Design Thinking in Service Design Process: A Conceptual Review
,”
J. Des. Think.
,
2
(
1
), pp.
23
36
.
43.
Behrens
,
T. E.
,
Muller
,
T. H.
,
Whittington
,
J. C.
,
Mark
,
S.
,
Baram
,
A. B.
,
Stachenfeld
,
K. L.
, and
Kurth-Nelson
,
Z.
,
2018
, “
What Is a Cognitive Map? Organizing Knowledge for Flexible Behavior
,”
Neuron
,
100
(
2
), pp.
490
509
.
44.
Kim
,
E. J.
, and
Kim
,
K. M.
,
2015
, “
Cognitive Styles in Design Problem Solving: Insights From Network-Based Cognitive Maps
,”
Des. Stud.
,
40
, pp.
1
38
.
45.
Zhou
,
C.
,
Chai
,
C.
, and
Liao
,
J.
,
2021
, “
Analysis of Problem Decomposition Strategies of Novice Industrial Designers Using Network-Based Cognitive Maps
,”
Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ.
,
32
(
2
), pp.
1
23
.
46.
Lu
,
C.
,
Lu
,
H.
,
Chen
,
D.
,
Wang
,
H.
,
Li
,
P.
, and
Gong
,
J.
,
2023
, “
Human-Like Decision Making for Lane Change Based on the Cognitive Map and Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning
,”
Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol.
,
156
, pp.
104328
.
47.
Liedtka
,
J.
,
2015
, “
Perspective: Linking Design Thinking With Innovation Outcomes Through Cognitive Bias Reduction
,”
J. Prod. Innov. Manage.
,
32
(
6
), pp.
925
938
.
48.
Crilly
,
N.
, and
Cardoso
,
C.
,
2017
, “
Where Next for Research on Fixation, Inspiration and Creativity in Design?
,”
Des. Stud.
,
50
, pp.
1
38
.
49.
Hu
,
Y.
,
Du
,
X.
,
Bryan-Kinns
,
N.
, and
Guo
,
Y.
,
2019
, “
Identifying Divergent Design Thinking Through the Observable Behavior of Service Design Novices
,”
Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ.
,
29
(
5
), pp.
1179
1191
.
50.
Quintana-Cifuentes
,
J.
, and
Purzer
,
S.
,
2022
, “
Semantic Fluency in Design Reasoning
,”
Int. J. Eng. Educ.
,
38
(
6
), pp.
1891
1903
.
51.
Goucher-Lambert
,
K.
,
Moss
,
J.
, and
Cagan
,
J.
,
2019
, “
A Neuroimaging Investigation of Design Ideation With and Without Inspirational Stimuli—Understanding the Meaning of Near and Far Stimuli
,”
Des. Stud.
,
60
, pp.
1
38
.
52.
Shah
,
J. J.
,
Millsap
,
R. E.
,
Woodward
,
J.
, and
Smith
,
S.
,
2012
, “
Applied Tests of Design Skills—Part 1: Divergent Thinking
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 134(4), p.
021005
.
53.
Lee
,
J. H.
, and
Ostwald
,
M. J.
,
2022
, “
The Relationship Between Divergent Thinking and Ideation in the Conceptual Design Process
,”
Des. Stud.
,
79
, pp.
101089
.
54.
Grace
,
K.
,
Maher
,
M. L.
,
Fisher
,
D.
, and
Brady
,
K.
,
2015
, “
Data-Intensive Evaluation of Design Creativity Using Novelty, Value, and Surprise
,”
Int. J. Des. Creat. Innov.
,
3
(
3–4
), pp.
125
147
.
55.
Christensen
,
B. T.
, and
Ball
,
L. J.
,
2016
, “
Dimensions of Creative Evaluation: Distinct Design and Reasoning Strategies for Aesthetic, Functional and Originality Judgments
,”
Des. Stud.
,
45
, pp.
116
136
.
56.
Shen
,
J.
,
Erkoyuncu
,
J. A.
,
Roy
,
R.
, and
Wu
,
B.
,
2017
, “
A Framework for Cost Evaluation in Product Service System Configuration
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
,
55
(
20
), pp.
6120
6144
.
57.
Manz
,
C. C.
,
Skaggs
,
B. C.
,
Pearce
,
C. L.
, and
Wassenaar
,
C. L.
,
2015
, “
Serving One Another: Are Shared and Self-Leadership the Keys to Service Sustainability?
,”
J. Organ. Behav.
,
36
(
4
), pp.
607
612
.
58.
Liu
,
X.
,
Werder
,
K.
, and
Maedche
,
A.
,
2020
, “
Novice Digital Service Designers' Decision-Making With Decision Aids—A Comparison of Taxonomy and Tags
,”
Decis. Support Syst.
,
137
, pp.
113367
.
59.
ChatGPT
,
November 20, 2022
, “Introducing ChatGPT,” https://openai.com/index/chatgpt/
60.
Tiangong
,
n.d.
, “Tiangong AI Creation,” https://work.tiangong.cn/home/writting/
61.
Raffel
,
C.
,
Shazeer
,
N.
,
Roberts
,
A.
,
Lee
,
K.
,
Narang
,
S.
,
Matena
,
M.
,
Zhou
,
Y.
,
Li
,
W.
, and
Liu
,
P. J.
,
2020
, “
Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning With a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer
,”
J. Mach. Learn. Res.
,
21
(
140
), pp.
1
67
.
62.
Eccles
,
D. W.
, and
Arsal
,
G.
,
2017
, “
The Think Aloud Method: What Is It and How Do I Use It?
,”
Qual. Res. Sport Exerc. Health
,
9
(
4
), pp.
514
531
.
63.
Charters
,
E.
,
2003
, “
The Use of Think-Aloud Methods in Qualitative Research an Introduction to Think-Aloud Methods
,”
Brock Educ. J.
,
12
(
2
), pp.
68
82
.
64.
Xie
,
L.
,
Liu
,
C.
,
Li
,
Y.
, and
Zhu
,
T.
,
2023
, “
How to Inspire Users in Virtual Travel Communities: The Effect of Activity Novelty on Users' Willingness to Co-Create
,”
J. Retail. Consum. Serv.
,
75
, pp.
103448
.
65.
Acar
,
S.
,
Burnett
,
C.
, and
Cabra
,
J. F.
,
2017
, “
Ingredients of Creativity: Originality and More
,”
Creat. Res. J.
,
29
(
2
), pp.
133
144
.
66.
Wu
,
J.
,
Zhang
,
L.
, and
Ren
,
X.
,
2022
, “
Incorporating the Co-Creation Method Into Social Innovation Design to Promote Intergenerational Integration: A Case Study of a Public Square
,”
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
,
19
(
19
), pp.
12908
.
67.
Chou
,
C.-J.
,
Chen
,
C.-W.
, and
Conley
,
C.
,
2012
, “
A Systematic Approach to Generate Service Model for Sustainability
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
29
, pp.
173
187
.
68.
Kjaer
,
L. L.
,
Pagoropoulos
,
A.
,
Schmidt
,
J. H.
, and
McAloone
,
T. C.
,
2016
, “
Challenges When Evaluating Product/Service-Systems Through Life Cycle Assessment
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
120
, pp.
95
104
.
69.
Ciasullo
,
M. V.
,
Troisi
,
O.
,
Grimaldi
,
M.
, and
Leone
,
D.
,
2020
, “
Multi-Level Governance for Sustainable Innovation in Smart Communities: An Ecosystems Approach
,”
Int. Entrep. Manag. J.
,
16
(
4
), pp.
1167
1195
.
70.
Manzini
,
E.
, and
Vezzoli
,
C.
,
2003
, “
A Strategic Design Approach to Develop Sustainable Product Service Systems: Examples Taken From the ‘Environmentally Friendly Innovation’Italian Prize
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
11
(
8
), pp.
851
857
.
71.
Scott
,
G. M.
,
Lonergan
,
D. C.
, and
Mumford
,
M. D.
,
2005
, “
Conceptual Combination: Alternative Knowledge Structures, Alternative Heuristics
,”
Creat. Res. J.
,
17
(
1
), pp.
79
98
.
72.
Kashapov
,
M. M.
, and
Leybina
,
A. V.
,
2009
, “
Motivation of Professional Creative Thinking
,”
Psychol. Russia
,
2
(
1
), pp.
585
602
.
73.
Perez
,
B.
,
Hilburn
,
S.
,
Jensen
,
D.
, and
Wood
,
K. L.
,
2019
, “
Design Principle-Based Stimuli for Improving Creativity During Ideation
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
,
233
(
2
), pp.
493
503
.
74.
Eckert
,
C.
, and
Stacey
,
M.
,
2000
, “
Sources of Inspiration: A Language of Design
,”
Des. Stud.
,
21
(
5
), pp.
523
538
.
75.
Kelly
,
N.
, and
Gero
,
J. S.
,
2014
, “
Interpretation in Design: Modelling how the Situation Changes During Design Activity
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
25
(
2
), pp.
109
124
.
76.
Abbas
,
W.
,
Laszka
,
A.
,
Vorobeychik
,
Y.
, and
Koutsoukos
,
X.
, “
Improving Network Connectivity Using Trusted Nodes and Edges
,”
Proceedings of the 2017 American Control Conference (ACC)
,
Seattle, WA
,
May 24–26
, IEEE, pp.
328
333
.
77.
Besta
,
M.
,
Memedi
,
F.
,
Zhang
,
Z.
,
Gerstenberger
,
R.
,
Blach
,
N.
,
Nyczyk
,
P.
,
Copik
,
M.
,
Kwaśniewski
,
G.
,
Müller
,
J.
, and
Gianinazzi
,
L.
,
2024
, “
Topologies of Reasoning: Demystifying Chains, Trees, and Graphs of Thoughts
,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.14295.
78.
Rocha
,
C. S.
,
Antunes
,
P.
, and
Partidário
,
P.
,
2019
, “
Design for Sustainability Models: A Multiperspective Review
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
234
, pp.
1428
1445
.
79.
AtKisson
,
A.
,
1996
, “
Developing Indicators of Sustainable Community: Lessons From Sustainable Seattle
,”
Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
,
16
(
4–6
), pp.
337
350
.
80.
Lanzi
,
P. L.
, and
Loiacono
,
D.
, “
Chatgpt and Other Large Language Models as Evolutionary Engines for Online Interactive Collaborative Game Design
,”
Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
,
Lisbon, Portugal
,
July 15–19
, pp.
1383
1390
.
81.
Agarwal
,
M.
,
Raju
,
V.
,
Dey
,
R.
, and
Nanda
,
I.
,
2022
, “
Descriptive Research on AI-Based Tools to Aid Personalized Customer Service: Case of ChatGPT
,”
J. Reproducible Res.
,
1
(
1
), pp.
140
146
.
82.
Guo
,
Y.
, and
Lee
,
D.
,
2023
, “
Leveraging Chatgpt for Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills
,”
J. Chem. Educ.
,
100
(
12
), pp.
4876
4883
.
83.
Carlgren
,
L.
,
Rauth
,
I.
, and
Elmquist
,
M.
,
2016
, “
Framing Design Thinking: The Concept in Idea and Enactment
,”
Creat. Innov. Manag.
,
25
(
1
), pp.
38
57
.
84.
Lawson
,
B.
,
2004
, “
Schemata, Gambits and Precedent: Some Factors in Design Expertise
,”
Des. Stud.
,
25
(
5
), pp.
443
457
.
85.
dos Santos
,
A. B. A.
,
Bianchi
,
C. G.
, and
Borini
,
F. M.
,
2018
, “
Open Innovation and Cocreation in the Development of New Products: The Role of Design Thinking
,”
Int. J. Innov.
,
6
(
2
), pp.
112
123
.
You do not currently have access to this content.