Research Papers

A Dimensionless Quotient for Determining Coupling Strength in Modal Energy Analysis

[+] Author and Article Information
Peng Zhang, Shaoqing Wu, Yanbin Li

Department of Engineering Mechanics,
Southeast University,
Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China

Qingguo Fei

Department of Engineering Mechanics,
Southeast University,
Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China
e-mail: QGFei@seu.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Noise Control and Acoustics Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received March 29, 2016; final manuscript received July 27, 2016; published online September 21, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Nicole Kessissoglou.

J. Vib. Acoust 138(6), 061014 (Sep 21, 2016) (7 pages) Paper No: VIB-16-1150; doi: 10.1115/1.4034377 History: Received March 29, 2016; Revised July 27, 2016

Modal energy analysis (MODENA) is an energy-based method recently proposed to estimate the dynamic response of a coupled structure/acoustic cavity system. The accuracy of MODENA is affected by the coupling strength between structural and acoustic modes. A dimensionless coupling quotient which is equal to the ratio of the gyroscopic coupling coefficient and the critical coefficient at modal frequencies is defined to determine the coupling strength in MODENA. The coupling strength of the system is classified as weak, moderate, or strong, according to the coupling quotient with a proposed criterion. When computing the modal input power in MODENA, the mobility of the uncoupled mode can be used if the modes are weakly coupled, but the mobility of the coupled mode should be adopted to obtain accurate results if many modes are moderately coupled. The effectiveness of the proposed criterion is validated via a numerical example where a plate is coupled with an acoustic cavity. Results show that many low-order structural and acoustic modes are moderately coupled while almost all high-order modes are weakly coupled. Errors of the energy responses appear in a low-frequency band, but accurate results are acquired in a mid- to high-frequency band when the mobility of uncoupled mode is used.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Topics: Acoustics , Cavities , Errors
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Lyon, R. H. , and Dejong, R. G. , 1995, Theory and Application of Statistical Energy Analysis, Butterworth-Heinemann, London.
Maxit, L. , and Guyader, J. L. , 2003, “ Extension of the SEA Model to Subsystems With Non-Uniform Modal Energy Distribution,” J. Sound Vib., 265(2), pp. 337–358. [CrossRef]
Totaro, N. , and Guyader, J. L. , 2013, “ Modal Energy Analysis,” J. Sound Vib., 332(16), pp. 3735–3749. [CrossRef]
Lyon, R. H. , and Maidanik, G. , 1962, “ Power Flow Between Linearly Coupled Oscillators,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 34(5), pp. 623–639. [CrossRef]
Newland, D. E. , 1966, “ Calculation of Power Flow Between Coupled Oscillators,” J. Sound Vib., 3(3), pp. 262–276. [CrossRef]
Le Bot, A. , and Cotoni, V. , 2010, “ Validity Diagrams of Statistical Energy Analysis,” J. Sound Vib., 329(2), pp. 221–235. [CrossRef]
Ji, L. , and Huang, Z. , 2014, “ A Simple Statistical Energy Analysis Technique on Modeling Continuous Coupling Interfaces,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 136(1), p. 014501. [CrossRef]
Díaz-Cereceda, C. , Poblet-Puig, J. , and Rodríguez-Ferran, A. , 2013, “ Numerical Estimation of Coupling Loss Factors in Building Acoustics,” J. Sound Vib., 332(21), pp. 5433–5450. [CrossRef]
D'Amico, R. , Koo, K. , and Huybrechs, D. , 2013, “ On the Use of the Residue Theorem for the Efficient Evaluation of Band-Averaged Input Power Into Linear Second-Order Dynamic Systems,” J. Sound Vib., 332(26), pp. 7205–7225. [CrossRef]
Keane, A. J. , and Prince, W. G. , 1987, “ Statistical Energy Analysis of Strongly Coupled Systems,” J. Sound Vib., 117(2), pp. 363–386. [CrossRef]
Fahy, F. , and Deyuan, Y. , 1987, “ Power Flow Between Non-Conservatively Coupled Oscillators,” J. Sound Vib., 114(1), pp. 1–11. [CrossRef]
Heron, K. H. , 1994, “ Advanced Statistical Energy Analysis,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A, 346(1681), pp. 501–510. [CrossRef]
Lai, M. L. , and Soom, A. , 1990, “ Prediction of Transient Vibration Envelopes Using Statistical Energy Analysis Techniques,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 112(1), pp. 127–137. [CrossRef]
Guasch, O. , and García, C. , 2014, “ Numerical Local Time Stepping Solutions for Transient Statistical Energy Analysis,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 136(6), p. 064502. [CrossRef]
Chappell, D. J. , Löchel, D. , and Søndergaard, N. , 2014, “ Dynamical Energy Analysis on Mesh Grids: A New Tool for Describing the Vibro-Acoustic Response of Complex Mechanical Structures,” Wave Motion, 51(4), pp. 589–597. [CrossRef]
Totaro, N. , and Guyader, J. L. , 2012, “ Extension of the Statistical Modal Energy Distribution Analysis for Estimating Energy Density in Coupled Subsystems,” J. Sound Vib., 331(13), pp. 3114–3129. [CrossRef]
Totaro, N. , and Guyader, J. L. , 2013, “ MODal ENergy Analysis,” J. Sound Vib., 332(16), pp. 3735–3749. [CrossRef]
Smith, P. W. , 1979, “ Statistical Models of Coupled Dynamical Systems and the Transition From Weak to Strong Coupling,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 65(3), pp. 695–698. [CrossRef]
Wang, X. , 2016, “ Coupling Loss Factor of Linear Vibration Energy Harvesting Systems in a Framework of Statistical Energy Analysis,” J. Sound Vib., 362(1), pp. 125–141. [CrossRef]
Wang, X. , Liang, X. , and Shu, G. , 2016, “ Coupling Analysis of Linear Vibration Energy Harvesting Systems,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 70–71, pp. 428–444. [CrossRef]
Maxit, L. , and Guyader, J. L. , 2001, “ Estimation of SEA Coupling Loss Factors Using a Dual Formulation and FEM Modal Information, Part I: Theory,” J. Sound Vib., 239(5), pp. 907–930. [CrossRef]
Scharton, T. D. , and Lyon, R. H. , 1968, “ Power Flow and Energy Sharing in Random Vibration,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 43(6), pp. 1332–1343. [CrossRef]
Maxit, L. , 2013, “ Analysis of the Modal Energy Distribution of an Excited Vibrating Panel Coupled With a Heavy Fluid Cavity by a Dual Modal Formulation,” J. Sound Vib., 332(25), pp. 6703–6724. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of a multimodal coupling system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The energy responses Ea and the errors ea near the eigenfrequencies of (a) the structural mode and (b) the acoustic mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The critical quotient κam as a function of the structural modal damping ηs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The critical quotient as a function of the modal frequencies when ηs = ηa = 0.01. White dashed lines—contour lines; blue solid lines—boundary of the octave frequency band.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The critical quotient κam as a function of the dimensionless factor T

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Total energy responses Eat of the acoustic subsystem in (a) case I, (b) case II, and (c) case II

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Sketch of the plate/cavity coupling case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The coupling quotients between the uncoupled structural modes and the uncoupled acoustic modes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The ratios of the coupling quotients to the critical quotients κa/ κam

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Total energy responses Ecavity of the cavity



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In