Research Papers

Rotordynamic Analysis of Rotor–Stator Rub Using Rough Surface Contact

[+] Author and Article Information
Philip Varney

Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30318
e-mail: pvarney3@gatech.edu

Itzhak Green

Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30318
e-mail: itzhak.green@me.gatech.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Technical Committee on Vibration and Sound of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received July 22, 2015; final manuscript received January 5, 2016; published online February 3, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Patrick S. Keogh.

J. Vib. Acoust 138(2), 021015 (Feb 03, 2016) (9 pages) Paper No: VIB-15-1274; doi: 10.1115/1.4032515 History: Received July 22, 2015; Revised January 05, 2016

Undesirable rotor–stator rub is frequently observed in rotordynamic systems, and has been the subject of many investigations. Most of these studies employ a simple piecewise-smooth linear-elastic contact model (LECM), where the rotor switches between noncontacting and contacting operation once the clearance is exceeded (various complications have been incorporated, though the essential model premises endure). Though useful as a first step, the LECM relies on an arcane contact stiffness estimate, and therefore does not emulate the actual contacting surfaces. Consequentially, the LECM fails to elucidate how real surface parameters influence contact severity and surface durability. This work develops a novel model for rotor–stator rub which is commensurate with reality by treating the surfaces as a collection of stochastically distributed asperities. Specifically, the elastoplastic Jackson–Green (JG) rough surface contact model is used to calculate the quasistatic contact force as a function of rotor displacement, where bulk material deformation and surface cumulative damage are ignored. A simple exponential fit of the contact force is proposed to reduce computational burden associated with evaluating the JG rough surface contact model at each simulation time step. The rotor's response using the LECM and JG rough surface contact model is compared via shaft speed bifurcations and orbit analysis. Significant differences are observed between the models, though some similarities exist for responses with few contacts per rotor revolution.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Green, I. , and Casey, C. , 2005, “ Crack Detection in a Rotor Dynamic System by Vibration Monitoring: Part I—Analysis,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 127(2), pp. 425–436. [CrossRef]
Varney, P. , and Green, I. , 2012, “ Crack Detection in a Rotordynamic System by Vibration Monitoring—Part II: Extended Analysis and Experimental Results,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(11), p. 112501. [CrossRef]
Varney, P. , and Green, I. , 2013, “ Rotordynamic Crack Diagnosis: Distinguishing Crack Location and Depth,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(11), p. 112101. [CrossRef]
Lee, A. S. , and Green, I. , 1994, “ Higher Harmonic Oscillations in a Non-Contacting FMR Mechanical Face Seal Test Rig,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 116(2), pp. 161–167. [CrossRef]
Varney, P. , and Green, I. , 2014, “ Rotor/Stator Rubbing Contact in an Overhung Rotordynamic System,” STLE Annual Meeting, Lake Buena Vista, FL, May 18–22.
Beatty, R. F. , 1985, “ Differentiating Rotor Response Due to Radial Rubbing,” J. Vib., Acoust., Stress, Reliab. Des., 107(2), pp. 151–160. [CrossRef]
Choy, F. K. , and Padovan, J. , 1987, “ Nonlinear Transient Analysis of Rotor-Casing Rub Events,” J. Sound Vib., 113(3), pp. 529–545. [CrossRef]
Kim, Y. B. , and Noah, S. T. , 1990, “ Bifurcation Analysis for a Modified Jeffcott Rotor With Bearing Clearances,” Nonlinear Dyn., 1(3), pp. 221–241. [CrossRef]
Chu, F. , and Zhang, Z. , 1997, “ Bifurcation and Chaos in a Rub-Impact Jeffcott Rotor System,” J. Sound Vib., 210(1), pp. 1–18. [CrossRef]
Sawicki, J. T. , Padovan, J. , and Al-Khatib, R. , 1999, “ The Dynamics of Rotor With Rubbing,” Int. J. Rotating Mach., 5(4), pp. 295–304. [CrossRef]
Edwards, S. , Lees, A. W. , and Friswell, M. I. , 1999, “ The Influence of Torsion on Rotor/Stator Contact in Rotating Machinery,” J. Sound Vib., 225(4), pp. 767–778. [CrossRef]
Lin, F. , Schoen, M. P. , and Korde, U. A. , 2001, “ Numerical Investigation With Rub-Related Vibration in Rotating Machinery,” J. Vib. Control, 7(6), pp. 833–848. [CrossRef]
Karpenko, E. V. , Wiercigroch, M. , and Cartmell, M. P. , 2002, “ Regular and Chaotic Dynamics of a Discontinuously Nonlinear Rotor System,” Chaos, Solitons, Fractals, 13(6), pp. 1231–1242. [CrossRef]
Qin, W. , Chen, G. , and Meng, G. , 2004, “ Nonlinear Responses of a Rub-Impact Overhung Rotor,” Chaos, Solitons, Fractals, 19(5), pp. 1161–1172. [CrossRef]
Peng, Z. K. , Chu, F. L. , and Tse, P. W. , 2005, “ Detection of the Rubbing-Caused Impacts for Rotor-Stator Fault Diagnosis Using Reassigned Scalogram,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 19(2), pp. 391–409. [CrossRef]
Zhang, W. M. , and Meng, G. , 2006, “ Stability, Bifurcation and Chaos of a High-Speed Rub-Impact Rotor System in MEMS,” Sens. Actuators, 127(1), pp. 163–178. [CrossRef]
Chang-Jian, C. W. , and Chen, C. K. , 2009, “ Chaos of Rub-Impact Rotor Supported by Bearings With Nonlinear Suspension,” Tribol. Int., 42(3), pp. 426–439. [CrossRef]
Inayat-Hussain, J. I. , 2010, “ Bifurcations in the Response of a Jeffcott Rotor With Rotor-to-Stator Rub,” ASME Paper No. ESDA2010-24453.
Cao, J. , Ma, C. , Jiang, Z. , and Liu, S. , 2011, “ Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Fractional Order Rub-Impact Rotor System,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 16(3), pp. 1443–1463. [CrossRef]
Abu-Mahfouz, I. , and Banerjee, A. , 2013, “ On the Investigation of Nonlinear Dynamics of a Rotor With Rub-Impact Using Numerical Analysis and Evolutionary Algorithms,” Procedia Comput. Sci., 20, pp. 140–147. [CrossRef]
Chavez, J. P. , and Wiercigroch, M. , 2013, “ Bifurcation Analysis of Periodic Orbits of a Non-Smooth Jeffcott Rotor Model,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 18(9), pp. 2571–2580. [CrossRef]
Groll, G. V. , and Ewins, D. J. , 2002, “ A Mechanism of Low Subharmonic Response in Rotor/Stator Contact-Measurements and Simulation,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 124(3), pp. 350–358. [CrossRef]
Abu-Mahfouz , 1993, “ Routes to Chaos in Rotor Dynamics,” Ph.D. thesis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
Popprath, S. , and Ecker, H. , 2007, “ Nonlinear Dynamics of a Rotor Contacting an Elastically Suspended Stator,” J. Sound Vib., 308, pp. 767–784. [CrossRef]
Varney, P. , and Green, I. , 2014, “ Nonlinear Phenomena, Bifurcations, and Routes to Chaos in an Asymmetrically Supported Rotor-Stator Contact System,” J. Sound Vib., 336, pp. 207–226. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , 2005, “ Poisson Ratio Effects and Critical Values in Spherical and Cylindrical Hertzian Contact,” Int. J. Appl. Mech. Eng., 10(3), pp. 451–462.
Varney, P. , and Green, I. , 2015, “ Applying Rough Surface Contact of Curved Conformal Surfaces to Rotor-Stator Rub,” 70th STLE Annual Meeting, Dallas, TX, May 17–21.
Varney, P. , and Green, I. , 2015, “ Rough Surface Contact of Curved Conformal Surfaces: An Application to Rotor-Stator Rub,” ASME J. Tribol. (in press).
Greenwood, J. A. , and Williamson, J. B. P. , 1966, “ Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces,” Proc. R. Soc. A, 295(1442), pp. 300–319. [CrossRef]
Jackson, R. L. , and Green, I. , 2005, “ A Finite Element Study of Elasto-Plastic Hemispherical Contact,” ASME J. Tribol., 127(2), pp. 343–354. [CrossRef]
Chang, W. R. , Etsion, I. , and Bogy, D. B. , 1987, “ An Elastic-Plastic Model for the Contact of Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 109(2), pp. 257–263. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , 2002, “ A Transient Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Seals Including Asperity Contact and Face Deformation,” Tribol. Trans., 45(3), pp. 284–293. [CrossRef]
Jackson, R. L. , and Green, I. , 2006, “ A Statistical Model of Elasto-Plastic Asperity Contact Between Rough Surfaces,” Tribol. Int., 39(9), pp. 906–914. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Jeffcott rotor with finite rotor–stator set-point clearanceδ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Broadband frequency spectra indicating the presence of chaotic response (JG model, n = 1.7ωn)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Observing differences between the LECM and JG rotor–stator rub models on a finer scale (n = 1.7ωn): (a) LECM (kc = 5 × 108 N/m) and (b) JG rotor–stator rub model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Similarities between rotor orbits using the LECM and JG models (n = 1.45ωn): (a) LECM and (b) JG (exponential contact force fit)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Fitting an exponential function to the quasistatic contact force versus rotor radial deflection (expressed as the number of surface height standard deviations from the clearance; i.e., rotor–stator closeness)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Distinctions between rotor orbits using the LECM and JG models (n = 1.7ωn): (a) LECM (kc = 5 × 108 N/m), (b) JG rotor–stator rub model (full numeric simulation), and (c) JG rotor–stator rub model (exponential contact force fit)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Identifying the radial range over which impact occurs (a) rotor–stator closeness (i.e., separation distance) expressed in multiples of the surface height standard deviation, σ and (b) corresponding contact force

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparing the LECM and the JG rough surface contact model [28]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Clearance between the rotor and stator as a function of circumferential position

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Lateral contact in the Jeffcott rotor. (a) Undeflected rotor–stator system and (b) deflected rotor with lateral contact.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Shaft speed bifurcation study (see Appendix B for surface and rotor parameters) (a) LECM (kc = 5 × 108 N/m) and (b) JG



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In