Research Papers

Stiffness Sensor for Cubic Nonlinear Elasticity Using Nonlinear Self-Excited Oscillation

[+] Author and Article Information
Yosuke Kokubun

Graduate Student
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Keio University,
3-14-1 Hiyoshi,
Kouhoku, Yokohama City,
Kanagawa 223-8522, Japan

Hiroshi Yabuno

Graduate School of Systems
and Information Engineering,
University of Tsukuba,
1-1-1, Ten-no-dai,
Tsukuba Science City,
Ibaraki 305-8573, Japan
e-mail: yabuno@esys.tsukuba.ac.jp

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received June 13, 2013; final manuscript received February 5, 2014; published online April 1, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Steven W Shaw.

J. Vib. Acoust 136(3), 031011 (Apr 01, 2014) (5 pages) Paper No: VIB-13-1200; doi: 10.1115/1.4026889 History: Received June 13, 2013; Revised February 05, 2014

The present paper develops a nonlinear stiffness sensor for measuring cubic nonlinear elasticity. The measurement system consists of a vibrator with a control circuit. We apply linear-plus-nonlinear feedback to actuate the vibrator attached to a measurement object for inducing van der Pol type self-excited oscillation so that the response amplitude of the oscillation can be set arbitrarily by changing the nonlinear feedback gain. We focus on the fact that the nonlinear elasticity of the measurement object causes a natural frequency shift related to the magnitude of vibration amplitude of the vibrator. We can set the response amplitude to various values by changing the nonlinear feedback gain and measuring the shift of the response frequency depending on the magnitude of the response amplitude. As a result, based on the bend of the experimentally obtained backbone curve, the nonlinear elasticity of the measurement object is identified.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Krouskop, A. T., Wheeler, T. M., Kallel, F., Garra, B. S., and Hall, T., 1998, “Elastic Moduli of Breast and Prostate Tissues Under Compression,” Ultrason. Img., 20(4), pp. 260–274. [CrossRef]
Greenleaf, J. F., Fatemi, M., and Insana, M., 2003, “Selected Methods for Imaging Elastic Properties of Biological Tissues,” Biomed. Eng., 5, pp. 57–78. [CrossRef]
Murayama, Y., Haruta, M., Hatakeyama, Y., Shiina, T., Sakuma, H., Takenoshita, S., Omata, S., and Christos, C. E., 2008, “Development of a New Instrument for Examination of Stiffness in the Breast Using Haptic Sensor Technology,” Sensors Actuators, 143(2), pp. 430–438. [CrossRef]
Valdastri, P., Sieber, A., Yanagihara, M., Fujie, M., Houston, K., Menciassi, A., and Dario, P., 2007, “Miniaturised Cutting Tool With Triaxial Force Sensing Capabilities for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” ASME J. Med. Devices, 1(3), pp. 206–211. [CrossRef]
Tholey, G., Desai, J. P., and Castellanos, A. E., 2005, “Force Feedback Plays a Significant Role in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Results and Analysis,” Ann. Surg., 241(1), pp. 102–109. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zheng, Y.-P., and Mak, A. F. T., 1999, “An Ultrasound Indentation System for Biomechanical Properties Assessment of Soft Tissues In-Vivo,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 43(9), pp. 912–918. [CrossRef]
Omata, S., and Terunuma, Y., 1992, “New Tactile Sensor Like the Human Hand and Its Applications,” Sensors Actuators, 35(1), pp. 9–15. [CrossRef]
Jalkanen, V., 2010, “Hand-Held Resonance Sensor for Tissue Stiffness Measurements—A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis,” Meas. Sci. Tech., 21(5), p. 055801. [CrossRef]
Eklund, A., Bergh, A., and Lindahl, O. A., 1999, “A Catheter Tactile Sensor for Measuring Hardness of Soft Tissue: Measurement in a Silicone Model and in an In Vitro Human Prostate Model,” Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 37(5), pp. 618–624. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Aoyagi, R., and Yoshida, T., 2004, “Frequency Equations of an Ultrasonic Vibrator for the Elastic Sensor Using a Contact Impedance Method,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 43(5B), pp. 3204–3209. [CrossRef]
Itoh, H., and Hatakeyama, N., 2010, “Proposal of Novel Method to Measure Young’s Modulus of Materials Using Change in Motional Capacitance of the Electrical Equivalent Circuit of Quartz-Crystal Tuning-Fork Tactile Sensor at Resonance,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 49(7), p. 07HC03. [CrossRef]
Szewczyk, S. T., Shih, W. Y., and Shih, W.-H., 2006, “Palpationlike Soft-Material Elastic Modulus Measurement Using Piezoelectric Cantilevers,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 77(4), p. 044302. [CrossRef]
Peng, P., and Rajamani, R., 2011, “Handheld Microtactile Sensor for Elasticity Measurement,” IEEE Sensors J., 11(9), pp. 1935–1942. [CrossRef]
Shikida, M., Shimizu, T., Sato, K., and Itoigawa, K., 2008, “Active Tactile Sensor for Detecting Contact Force and Hardness of an Object,” Sensors Actuators, 103(1–2), pp. 213–218. [CrossRef]
Fath El Bab, A. M. R., Sugano, K., Tsuchiya, T., Tabata, O., Eltaib, M. E. H., and Sallam, M. M., 2012, “Micromachined Tactile Sensor for Soft-Tissue Compliance Detection,” J. Microelectromech. Syst., 21(3), pp. 635–645. [CrossRef]
Wellman, P. S., Howe, R. D., Dalton, E., and Kern, K. A., 1999, “Breast Tissue Stiffness in Compression is Correlated to Histological Diagnosis,” Harvard BioRobotics Laboratory, Cambridge, MA.
Treloar, L. R. G., 1949, The Physics of Rubber Elasticity, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Behjat, B., and Khoshravan, M. R., 2012, “Nonlinear Static Response of Piezoelectric Plates Considering Electro-Mechanical Coupling,” J. Cent. South Univ., 19(5), pp. 1182–1188. [CrossRef]
Nayfeh, A. H., and Mook, D. T., 1979, Nonlinear Oscillations, Wiley, New York.
Jordan, D. W., and Smith, P., 1999, Nonlinear Ordinary Differential Equations: An Introduction to Dynamical Systems, Oxford University Press, New York.
Nunes, L. C. S., and Moreira, D. C., 2013, “Simple Shear Under Large Deformation: Experimental and Theoretical Analyses,” Eur. J. Mech. A Solids, 42, pp. 315–322. [CrossRef]
Sacks, M. S., 2000, “Biaxial Mechanical Evaluation of Planar Biological Materials,” J. Elasticity, 61(1–3), pp. 199–246. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Y. W., Li, S. J., Obbard, E. G., Wang, H., Wang, S. C., Hao, Y. L., and Yang, R., 2011, “Elastic Properties of Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn Single Crystals With Bcc Crystal Structure,” Acta Mater., 59(8), pp. 3081–3090. [CrossRef]
Yabuno, H., Kunitho, Y., and Kashimura, T., 2008, “Analysis of the van der Pol System With Coulomb Friction Using the Method of Multiple Scales,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 130(4), p. 041008. [CrossRef]
Thompson, J. M. T., and Stewart, H. B., 1986, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos, Wiley, New York.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of the measurement system. The control force is applied to the measurement object through a vibrator, and a van der Pol type self-excited oscillation is produced in the vibration rod attached to the measurement object under the proposed nonlinear feedback control.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Experimental apparatus for measuring the nonlinear stiffness using the proposed measurement method. The nonlinear stiffness is caused by the repulsive forces in two pairs of permanent magnets.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Backbone curves of the vibration rod attached to the measurement object. expressed by ω = 1+Klin+(3Knon/81+Klin), where ω is the nonlinear natural frequency depending on the amplitude. Klin and Knon are the linear stiffness and the nonlinear stiffness of the measurement object. Knon is positive or negative depending on whether the nonlinear characteristic of the measurement object is hard or soft, respectively. The backbone curve corresponds to the relationship between the response frequency and the response amplitude in the van der Pol type self-excited vibration rod.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Frequency response curve. The plots show the relationship between the response frequency and the response amplitude, which is set to various values by changing the nonlinear feedback gain. The line is the curve fitted by the least squares method.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Picture of experimental apparatus for measuring the nonlinear stiffness using the proposed measurement method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Static measurement of nonlinear stiffness of the measurement object by digital force gauge

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Relationship between displacement and magnetic restoring force. The line is the curve obtained using klin and knon identified from the proposed measurement method, and klin = 2.19 and knon = 0.0057 are estimated from Fig. 5. The plots indicate the values obtained by static measurement.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In