Research Papers

Analytical and Finite Element Modal Analysis of a Hyperelastic Membrane for Micro Air Vehicle Wings

[+] Author and Article Information
Uttam Kumar Chakravarty

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of New Orleans,
New Orleans, LA 70148
e-mail: uchakrav@uno.edu

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received June 2, 2011; final manuscript received April 7, 2013; published online June 18, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Massimo Ruzzene.

J. Vib. Acoust 135(5), 051004 (Jun 18, 2013) (6 pages) Paper No: VIB-11-1126; doi: 10.1115/1.4024213 History: Received June 02, 2011; Revised April 07, 2013

Analytical and finite element models are developed for investigating the modal characteristics of a hyperelastic rubber latex membrane for micro air vehicle wings applications. A radially prestretched membrane specimen is attached to a thin, rigid circular ring and vibrated in vacuum and in air at atmospheric pressure. The natural frequencies of the membrane computed by analytical and finite element models are correlated well. The natural frequencies increase with mode and prestretch level of the membrane but decrease in air from those in vacuum due to the effect of added mass of air. The damping is low and has a very minimal effect on the frequencies but helps to reduce the amplitude of vibration. Aerodynamic pressure at different angles of attack and a freestream velocity is computed from the wind tunnel test data, and a finite element model is developed for investigating the effect of the aerodynamic pressure on the modal characteristics of the membrane. It is found that the effect of aerodynamic pressure on the natural frequencies of the membrane is not significant.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Raney, D., and Slominski, E., 2004, “Mechanization and Control Concepts for Biologically Inspired Micro Air Vehicles,” J. Aircr., 41, pp. 1257–1265. [CrossRef]
Song, A., and Breuer, K., 2007, “Dynamics of a Compliant Membrane as Related to Mammalian Flight,” Proceedings of the 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 8–11, AIAA Paper No. 2007-665. [CrossRef]
Wootton, R. J., 1993, “Leading Edge Section and Asymmetric Twisting in the Wings of Flying Butterflies (Insecta, Papilionoidea),” J. Exp. Biol., 180, pp. 105–117.
Wootton, R. J., 2003, “Reconstructing Insect Flight Performance From Fossil Evidence,” Acta Zool. Cracov., 46, pp. 89–99.
Wootton, R. J., 1992, “Functional Morphology of Insect Wings,” Annu. Rev. Entomol., 37, pp. 113–140. [CrossRef]
Ennos, A. R., and Wootton, R. J., 1989 “Functional Wing Morphology and Aerodynamics of Panorpa Germanica (Insecta: Mecoptera),” J. Exp. Biol., 143, pp. 267–284.
Combes, S. A., and Daniel, T. L., 2003, “Into Thin Air: Contributions of Aerodynamic and Inertial-Elastic Forces to Wing Bending in the Hawkmoth Manduca Sexta,” J. Exp. Biol., 206, pp. 2999–3006. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Daniel, T. L., and Combes, S. A., 2002, “Flexible Wings and Fins: Bending by Inertial or Fluid-Dynamic Forces?,” Integr. Comp. Biol., 42, pp. 1044–1049. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lian, Y., and Shyy, W., 2007, “Laminar-Turbulent Transition of a Low Reynolds Number Rigid or Flexible Airfoil,” AIAA J., 45, pp. 1501–1513. [CrossRef]
Ho, S., Nassef, H., Pornsinsirirakb, N., Tai, Y., and Ho, C., 2003, “Unsteady Aerodynamics and Flow Control for Flapping Wing Flyers,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 39, pp. 635–681. [CrossRef]
Chakravarty, U. K., and Albertani, R., 2011, “Modal Analysis of a Flexible Membrane Wing of Micro Air Vehicles,” J. Aircr., 48, pp. 1960–1967. [CrossRef]
Sewall, J., Miserentino, R., and Pappa, R., 1983, “Vibration Studies of a Lightweight Three-Sided Membrane Suitable for Space Applications,” NASA Technical Paper No. TP 2095.
Gaspar, J., Solter, M., and Pappa, R., 2002, “Membrane Vibration Studies Using a Scanning Laser Vibrometer,” NASA Technical Memorandum No. TM 211427.
Jenkins, C., and Korde, U., 2006, “Membrane Vibration Experiments: An Historical Review and Recent Results,” J. Sound Vib., 295, pp. 602–613. [CrossRef]
Graves, S., Bruner, A., Edwards, J., and Schuster, D., 2003, “Dynamic Deformation Measurements of an Aeroelastic Semispan Model,” J. Aircr., 40, pp. 977–984. [CrossRef]
Stanford, B., Sytsma, M., Albertani, R., Viieru, D., Shyy, W., and Ifju, P., 2007, “Static Aeroelastic Model Validation of Membrane Micro Air Vehicle Wings,” AIAA J., 45(12), pp. 2828–2837. [CrossRef]
Albertani, R., Stanford, B., Hubner, J., and Ifju, P., 2007, “Aerodynamic Coefficients and Deformation Measurements on Flexible Micro Air Vehicle Wings,” Exp. Mech., 47, pp. 625–635. [CrossRef]
Ozdoganlar, O., Hansche, B., and Carne, T., 2005, “Experimental Modal Analysis for Microelectromechanical Systems,” Exp. Mech., 45, pp. 498–506. [CrossRef]
Farlow, S. J., 1993, Partial Differential Equations for Scientists and Engineers, Dover, New York.
Kreyszig, E., 1999, Advanced Engineering Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Gonçalves, P. B., Soares, R. M., and Pamplona, D., 2009, “Nonlinear Vibrations of a Radially Stretched Circular Hyperelastic Membrane,” J. Sound Vib., 327, pp. 231–248. [CrossRef]
Zhu, J., Cai, S., and Suo, Z., 2010, “Resonant Behavior of a Membrane of a Dielectric Elastomer,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 47(24), pp. 3254–3262. [CrossRef]
Jenkins, C. H., and Leonard, J. W., 1991, “Nonlinear Dynamic Response of Membranes: State of the Art,” ASME Appl. Mech. Rev., 44, pp. 319–328. [CrossRef]
Fox, J. W., and Goulbourne, N. C., 2008 “On the Dynamic Electromechanical Loading of Dielectric Elastomer Membranes,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 56, pp. 2669–2686. [CrossRef]
Mockensturm, E. M., and Goulbourne, N., 2006, “Dynamic Response of Dielectric Elastomers,” Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 41, pp. 388–395. [CrossRef]
Tuzel, V. H., and Erbay, H. A., 2004, “The Dynamic Response of an Incompressible Non-Linearly Elastic Membrane Tube Subjected to a Dynamic Extension,” Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 39, pp. 515–537. [CrossRef]
Jiang, L., Haddow, J. B., and Wegner, J. L., 1992, “The Dynamic Response of a Stretched Circular Hyperelastic Membrane Subjected to Normal Impact,” Wave Motion, 16, pp. 137–150. [CrossRef]
Mooney, M., 1940, “A Theory of Large Elastic Deformation,” J. Appl. Phys., 11(9), pp. 582–592. [CrossRef]
Rivlin, R. S., 1948, “Large Elastic Deformations of Isotropic Materials. IV. Further Developments of the General Theory,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 241(835), pp. 379–397. [CrossRef]
Rivlin, R. S., 1953, “The Solution of Problems in Second-Order Elasticity,” J. Ration. Mech. Anal., 2, pp. 53–81.
Rivlin, R. S., and Saunders, D. W., 1951, “Large Elastic Deformations of Isotropic Materials. VII. Experiments on the Deformation of Rubber,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 243, pp. 251–288. [CrossRef]
Treloar, L. R. G., 1944, “Strains in an Inflated Rubber Sheet and the Mechanism of Bursting,” Trans. Inst. Rubber Ind., 19, pp. 201–212.
Chakravarty, U. K., and Albertani, R., 2011, “Energy Absorption Behavior of a Hyperelastic Membrane for Micro Air Vehicle Wings: Experimental and Finite Element Approaches,” Int. J. Micro Air Veh., 3(1), pp. 13–23. [CrossRef]
Treloar, L. R. G., 1975, Rubber Elasticity, Oxford University Press, London.
Ogden, R. W., 1972, “Large Deformation Isotropic Elasticity: On the Correlation of Theory and Experiment for Incompressible Rubber-Like Solids,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 326, pp. 565–584. [CrossRef]
Ogden, R. W., 1984, Non-Linear Elastic Deformation, Ellis-Horwood, Chichester, UK.
Gent, A. N., 1992, Engineering With Rubber, Oxford University Press, New York.
Drodzdov, A. D., 2007, “Constitutive Equations in Finite Elasticity of Rubbers,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 44, pp. 272–297. [CrossRef]
Arruda, E. M., and Boyce, M. C., 1993, “A Three-Dimensional Constitutive Model for the Large Stretch Behaviour of Rubber Elastic Materials,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 41, pp. 389–412. [CrossRef]
Boyce, M. C., and Arruda, E. M., 2000, “Constitutive Models for Rubber Elasticity: A Review,” Rubber Chem. Technol., 73, pp. 504–523. [CrossRef]
Yang, W. H., and Lu, C. H., 1973, “General Deformations of Neo-Hookean Membrane,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 40, pp. 1–12. [CrossRef]
Wong, F. S., and Shield, R. T., 1969, “Large Plane Deformations of Thin Elastic Sheets of Neo-Hookean Material,” J. Appl. Math. Phys. (ZAMP), 20, pp. 176–199. [CrossRef]
Yeoh, O. H., 1993, “Some Forms of the Strain Energy Function for Rubber,” Rubber Chem. Technol., 66, pp. 754–771. [CrossRef]
Sasso, M., Palmieri, G., Chiappini, G., and Amodio, D., 2008, “Characterization of Hyperelastic Rubber-Like Materials by Biaxial and Uniaxial Stretching Tests Based on Optical Methods,” Polymer Testing, 27, pp. 995–1004. [CrossRef]
Azuma, A., 2006, The Biokinetics of Flying and Swimming, 2nd ed., American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics, Inc., Reston, VA.
Cook, R. D., Malkus, D. S., and Plesha, M. E., 1989, Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
SIMULIA, 2009, “Abaqus 6.9® (Finite Element Analysis Software),” Rising Sun Mills, Providence, RI.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Two MAVs from the MAV Lab at the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Initial (stretch free) and (b) prestretched configurations of the circular membrane specimen. O (0,0) is the center of the membrane specimen.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Natural frequencies (fmn = ωmn/2π) versus prestretch ratio plots for the membrane specimen in vacuum

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Natural frequencies versus prestretch ratio plots for the membrane specimen in air

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Mode shapes of the membrane specimen at α = 20 deg and V = 13.0 m/s: (a) first (0, 1) mode shape, (b) second (1, 1) mode shape, and (c) third (2, 1) mode shape

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Variation of static out-of-plane deformation at the center of the membrane specimen with aerodynamic pressure at V = 13.0 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Static out-of-plane deformation of the membrane specimen at α = 20 deg and V = 13.0 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Aerodynamic pressure versus angle of attack plot at V = 13.0 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Coefficient of lift versus angle of attack plot at V = 13.0 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Mode shapes of the membrane specimen in air: (a) first (0, 1) mode shape, (b) second (1, 1) mode shape, (c) third (2, 1) mode shape



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In