Frequency Domain Identification of Tip-sample van der Waals Interactions in Resonant Atomic Force Microcantilevers

[+] Author and Article Information
Shuiqing Hu, Arvind Raman

School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907

Stephen Howell, Ron Reifenberger

Department of Physics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907

Matthew Franchek

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Houston, 4800 Calhoun Road, Houston, Texas, 77204-4792

J. Vib. Acoust 126(3), 343-351 (Jul 30, 2004) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1760560 History: Received February 01, 2003; Revised February 01, 2004; Online July 30, 2004
Copyright © 2004 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Israelachvili, J. N., 1992, Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 2nd edition, Academic Press, San Diego.
Cappella,  B., and Dietler,  G., 1999, “Force-distance Curves by Atomic Force Microscopy,” Surf. Sci. Rep., 34, pp. 1–104.
Visser,  J., 1972, “On Hamaker Constants: A Comparison between Hamaker Constants and Lifshitz- van der Waals Constants,” Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 3, pp. 331–363.
Bergstrom,  L., 1997, “Hamaker Constants of Inorganic Materials,” Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 70, pp. 125–169.
Argento,  C., and French,  R. H., 1996, “Parametric Tip Model and Force-distance Relation for Hamaker Constant Determination from Atomic Force Microscopy,” J. Appl. Phys., 80(11), pp. 6081–6090.
Hutter,  J. L., and Bechhoefer,  J., 1994, “Measurement and Manipulation of van der Waals Force in Atomic-force Microscopy,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, B12(3), pp. 2251–2253.
Biggs,  S., and Mulvaney,  P., 1994, “Measurement of the Forces between Gold Surfaces in Water by Atomic Force Microscopy,” J. Chem. Phys., 100(11), pp. 8501–8505.
Gady,  B., , 1996, “Identification of Electrostatic and van der Waals Interaction Forces Between a Micrometer-size Sphere and a Flat Substrate,” Phys. Rev. B, 53, pp. 8065–8070.
Gady,  B., Reifenberger,  R., and Rimai,  D. S., 1997, “Contact Electrification and the Interaction Force between a Micrometer-size Polystyrene Sphere and a Graphite Surface,” Langmuir, 13, pp. 2533–2537.
Gady,  B., , 1998, “The Interaction between Micrometer-size Particles and Flat Substrates: A Quantitative Study of Jump-to-contact,” J. Adhes., 67, pp. 291–305.
de Pablo,  P. J., , 1999, “Adhesion Maps Using Scanning Force Microscopy Techniques,” J. Adhes., 71, pp. 339–356.
Garcı́a,  R., and Perez,  R., 2002, “Dynamic Atomic Force Microscopy Methods,” Surf. Sci. Rep., 47, pp. 197–301.
Magonov,  S. N., Elings,  V., and Whangbo,  M. H., 1996, “Phase Imaging and Stiffness in Tapping-mode Atomic Force Microscopy,” Surf. Sci., 375, pp. 385–391.
Hölscher,  H., , 1999, “Determination of Tip-sample Interaction Potentials by Dynamic Force Spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 83(23), pp. 4780–4783.
Dürig,  U., 2000, “Interaction Sensing in Dynamic Force Microscopy,” New J. of Phys., 2, pp. 5.1–5.12.
Dürig,  U., 1999, “Conservative and Dissipative Interactions in Dynamic Force Microscopy,” Surf. Interface Anal., 27, pp. 467–473.
Yasuda,  K., and Kamiya,  K., 1997, “Experimental Identification Technique of Vibrating Structures with Geometrical Nonlinearity,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 64, pp. 275–280.
Krauss,  R. W., and Nayfeh,  A. H., 1999, “Experimental Nonlinear Identification of a Single Mode of a Transversely Excited Beam,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 18, pp. 69–87.
Doughty,  T. A., Davies,  P., and Bajaj,  A. K., 2000, “A Comparison of Three Techniques Using Steady State Data to Identify Nonlinear Modal Behavior of an Externally Excited Cantilever Beam,” J. Sound Vib., 249(4), pp. 785–813.
de Pablo,  P. J., , 1998, “Jumping Mode Scanning Force Microscopy,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 73, pp. 3300–3302.
Moreno-Herrero,  F., , 2000, “The Role of Shear Forces in Scanning Force Microscopy: a Comparison Between the Jumping Mode and Tapping mode,” Surf. Sci., 453, pp. 152–158.
Gil,  A. J., , 2001, “Different Stages of Water Adsorption on Au by Dynamic SFM and Jumping Mode,” Appl. Phys. A: Solids Surf., A72, pp. 137–140.
Lee,  S. I., , 2002, “Nonlinear Dynamics of Microcantilevers in Tapping Mode Atomic Force Microscopy: A Comparison Between Theory and Experiment,” Phys. Rev. B, 66(11), Art. No. 115409.
Ruetzel,  S., Lee,  S. I., and Raman,  A., 2003, “Nonlinear Dynamics of Atomic Force Microscope Probes Driven in Lennard-Jones Potentials,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 459(2036), pp. 1925–1948.
Meirovitch, L., 1997, Principles and Techniques of Vibrations, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.


Grahic Jump Location
Scanning electron micrograph of the diving-board microcantilever (Olympus tip OMCL-AC240TS) used in the experiment. The figure in the inset shows a zoomed in image of the tip taken after the experiments were performed.
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic diagram of the cantilever configurations as the cantilever vibrates about its elastostatic equilibrium
Grahic Jump Location
Frequency dependence of maximum and minimum tip deflection towards sample, and the phase of the first harmonic of the response with respect to excitation for base excitation amplitude Y=y/η*=0.0035. The dotted line denotes the unstable solution and solid line denotes the stable solution. Fold points are indicated by circles while period doubling bifurcations are marked by squares.
Grahic Jump Location
Frequency dependence of primary, secondary and zeroth harmonics of tip deflection towards sample with base excitation amplitude Y=y/η*=0.0035. (The dotted line denotes the unstable solution and solid line denotes the stable solution.)
Grahic Jump Location
Estimated Hamaker constants from the simulation data using the one- and three-term Harmonic Balance methods and using data at different excitation frequencies around resonance. The dashed line indicates the input value of the Hamaker constant A=2.96×10−19 J used in this simulation.
Grahic Jump Location
A schematic diagram of the experimental setup for using “Jumping mode” AFM to measure real time base piezo deflection, tip deflection and tip-sample separation signals
Grahic Jump Location
A typical example of the input-output signals required to implement a Hamaker Spectrometer. In (a), a plot of the experimental tip deflection signal is given. In (b), the motion of the Z piezo in the Jumping mode operation is plotted. In (c), the resulting power spectral density of the tip vibration signal obtained during the “noncontact sampling” time indicated in the box.
Grahic Jump Location
Estimated values for the Hamaker constants obtained from this study. In (a) the estimated Si-HOPG Hamaker constant using the one-term Harmonic Balance technique, as a function of the number of data sets at different excitation frequencies near resonance. In (b) the estimated Si-Au Hamaker constant using the one-term Harmonic Balance technique, as a function of the number of data sets at different excitation frequencies near resonance. In (c) the estimated Si-SiC Hamaker constant using the one-term Harmonic Balance technique, as a function of the number of data sets at different excitation frequencies near resonance. In all plots, the horizontal dashed lines correspond to the range of literature values for the Hamaker constants. The experiments on each sample were repeated twice. The mean of the two measurements along with the error bars are shown above. The error bars are the sum of all the estimated uncertainties discussed in Sec. 4.6.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In