Technical Brief

Surrogate Model Based Liner Optimization for Aeroengines and Comparison With Finite Elements

[+] Author and Article Information
Hanbo Jiang

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
The Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology Clear Water Bay,
Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China
e-mail: hb.jiang@connect.ust.hk

Alex Siu Hong Lau

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
The Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology Clear Water Bay,
Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China
e-mail: alexshlau@ust.hk

Xun Huang

State Key Laboratory of Turbulence and Complex System,
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics,
College of Engineering Peking University,
Beijing 100871, China;
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
The Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology Clear Water Bay,
Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China
e-mails: huangxun@pku.edu.cn; huangxun@ust.hk

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Noise Control and Acoustics Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received June 9, 2017; final manuscript received September 25, 2017; published online January 25, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Sheryl M. Grace.

J. Vib. Acoust 140(3), 034501 (Jan 25, 2018) (8 pages) Paper No: VIB-17-1249; doi: 10.1115/1.4038680 History: Received June 09, 2017; Revised September 25, 2017

Numerical optimizations are very useful in liner designs for low-noise aeroengines. Although modern computational tools are already very efficient for a single aeroengine noise propagation simulation run, the prohibitively high computational cost of a broadband liner optimization process which requires hundreds of thousands of runs renders these tools unsuitable for such task. To enable rapid optimization using a desktop computer, an efficient analytical solver based on the Wiener–Hopf method is proposed in the current study. Although a Wiener–Hopf-based solver can produce predictions very quickly (order of a second), it usually assumes an idealized straight duct configuration with a uniform background flow that makes it arguable for practical applications. In the current study, we employ the Wiener–Hopf method in our solver to produce an optimized liner design for a semi-infinite annular duct setup and compare its noise-reduction effect with an optimized liner designed by the direct application of a numerical finite element solver for a practical aeroengine intake configuration with an inhomogeneous background flow. The near-identical near- and far-field solutions by the Wiener–Hopf-based method and the finite element solvers clearly demonstrate the accuracy and high efficiency of the proposed optimization strategy. Therefore, the current Wiener–Hopf solver is highly effective for liner optimizations with practical setups and is very useful to the preliminary design process of low-noise aeroengines.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Richter, C. , Thiele, F. , Li, X. , and Zhuang, M. , 2007, “ Comparison of Time-Domain Impedance Boundary Conditions for Lined Duct Flows,” AIAA J., 45(6), pp. 1333–1345. [CrossRef]
Zhang, X. , 2012, “ Aircraft Noise and Its Nearfield Propagation Computations,” Acta Mech. Sin., 28(4), pp. 960–977. [CrossRef]
Rice, E. , 1979, “ Optimum Wall Impedance for Spinning Modes-A Correlation With Mode Cutoff Ratio,” J. Aircr., 16(5), pp. 336–343. [CrossRef]
Rice, E. , “ Modal Propagation Angles in Ducts With Soft Walls and Their Connection With Suppressor Performance,” AIAA Paper No. 1976-0624.
Rice, E. , 1976, “ Acoustic Liner Optimum Impedance for Spinning Modes With Mode Cut-Off Ratio as the Design Criterion,” AIAA Paper No. 1976-0516.
Lafronza, L. , McAlpine, A. , Keane, A. , and Astley, J. , 2006, “ Response Surface Method Optimization of Uniform and Axially Segmented Duct Acoustics Liners,” J. Aircr., 43(4), pp. 1089–1102. [CrossRef]
Fuller, C. R. , 1984, “ Propagation and Radiation of Sound From Flanged Circular Ducts With Circumferentially Varying Wall Admittances—I: Semi-Infinite Ducts,” J. Sound Vib., 93(3), pp. 321–340. [CrossRef]
Fuller, C. , 1984, “ Propagation and Radiation of Sound From Flanged Circular Ducts With Circumferentially Varying Wall Admittances—II: Finite Ducts With Sources,” J. Sound Vib., 93(3), pp. 341–351. [CrossRef]
Campos, L. , and Oliveira, J. , 2004, “ Optimization of Circumferentially Non-Uniform Acoustic Liners in Annular Ducts,” AIAA Paper No. 2004-3034.
Bogey, C. , Bailly, C. , and Juvé, D. , 2002, “ Computation of Flow Noise Using Source Terms in Linearized Euler's Equations,” AIAA J., 40(2), pp. 235–243. [CrossRef]
Tam, C. K. , and Webb, J. C. , 1993, “ Dispersion-Relation-Preserving Finite Difference Schemes for Computational Acoustics,” J. Comput. Phys., 107(2), pp. 262–281. [CrossRef]
Agarwal, A. , Morris, P. J. , and Mani, R. , 2004, “ Calculation of Sound Propagation in Nonuniform Flows: Suppression of Instability Waves,” AIAA J., 42(1), pp. 80–88. [CrossRef]
Huang, X. , Chen, X. , Ma, Z. , and Zhang, X. , 2008, “ Efficient Computation of Spinning Modal Radiation Through an Engine Bypass Duct,” AIAA J., 46(6), pp. 1413–1423. [CrossRef]
Casalino, D. , and Genito, M. , 2008, “ Turbofan Aft Noise Predictions Based on Lilley's Wave Model,” AIAA J., 46(1), pp. 84–93. [CrossRef]
Chen, X. , Huang, X. , and Zhang, X. , 2009, “ Sound Radiation From a Bypass Duct With Bifurcations,” AIAA J., 47(2), pp. 429–436. [CrossRef]
Ingard, U. , 1959, “ Influence of Fluid Motion past a Plane Boundary on Sound Reflection, Absorption, and Transmission,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 31(7), pp. 1035–1036. [CrossRef]
Myers, M. , 1980, “ On the Acoustic Boundary Condition in the Presence of Flow,” J. Sound Vib., 71(3), pp. 429–434. [CrossRef]
Fung, K. Y. , Ju, H. B. , and Tallapragada, B. , 2000, “ Impedance and Its Time-Domain Extensions,” AIAA J., 38(1), pp. 30–38. [CrossRef]
Huang, X. , Zhong, S. Y. , and Stalnov, O. , 2014, “ Analysis of Scattering From an Acoustic Cloak in a Moving Fluid,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 135(5), pp. 2571–2580. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rienstra, S. W. , and Darau, M. , 2011, “ Boundary-Layer Thickness Effects of the Hydrodynamic Instability Along an Impedance Wall,” J. Fluid Mech., 671, pp. 559–573. [CrossRef]
Brambley, E. J. , 2011, “ Well-Posed Boundary Condition for Acoustic Liners in Straight Ducts With Flow,” AIAA J., 49(6), pp. 1272–1282. [CrossRef]
Khamis, D. , and Brambley, E. J. , 2017, “ Viscous Effects on the Acoustics and Stability of a Shear Layer Over an Impedance Wall,” J. Fluid Mech., 810, pp. 489–534. [CrossRef]
Tsai, M. , 1982, “ Mode Scatterer Design for Fan Noise Suppression in Two-Dimensional Ducts,” J. Sound Vib., 83(4), pp. 501–512. [CrossRef]
Zhang, X. , and Chen, X. X. , 2014, “ Broadband Wave Propagation From an Aeroengine Duct,” AIAA J., 52(1), pp. 43–51. [CrossRef]
Buske, C. , Richter, C. , Thiele, F. , Yu, C. , and Zhuang, M. , 2010, “ Validation of a Zonal Approach Computing the Sound Radiation From Lined Ducts,” AIAA J., 48(12), pp. 2899–2908. [CrossRef]
Liu, X. , Jiang, H. B. , Huang, X. , and Chen, S. , 2016, “ Theoretical Model of Scattering From Flow Ducts With Semi-Infinite Axial Liner Splices,” J. Fluid Mech., 786, pp. 62–83. [CrossRef]
Jiang, H. , and Huang, X. , 2017, “ Efficient Impedance Eductions for Liner Tests in Grazing Flow Incidence Tube,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 139(3), p. 031002. [CrossRef]
Jiang, H. , Lau, A. S. H. , and Huang, X. , 2017, “ An Efficient Algorithm of Wiener-Hopf Method With GPU for Duct Acoustics,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 139(5), p. 054501. [CrossRef]
Munt, R. M. , 1977, “ The Interaction of Sound With a Subsonic Jet Issuing From a Semi-Infinite Cylindrical Pipe,” J. Fluids Mech., 83(4), pp. 609–640. [CrossRef]
Gabard, G. , and Astley, R. , 2006, “ Theoretical Model for Sound Radiation From Annular Jet Pipes: Far- and Near-Field Solutions,” J. Fluid Mech., 549, pp. 315–341. [CrossRef]
Veitch, B. , and Peake, N. , 2008, “ Acoustic Propagation and Scattering in the Exhaust Flow From Coaxial Cylinders,” J. Fluid Mech., 613, pp. 275–307. [CrossRef]
Samanta, A. , and Freund, J. B. , 2008, “ Finite-Wavelength Scattering of Incident Vorticity and Acoustic Waves at a Shrouded-Jet Exit,” J. Fluid Mech., 612, pp. 407–438. [CrossRef]
Rienstra, S. W. , 2007, “ Acoustic Scattering at a Hard-Soft Lining Transition in a Flow Duct,” J. Eng. Math., 59(4), pp. 451–475. [CrossRef]
Demir, A. , and Rienstra, S. , 2010, “ Sound Radiation From a Lined Exhaust Duct With Lined Afterbody,” 16th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Stockholm, Sweden, June 7–9, Paper No. 2010-3947. http://www.win.tue.nl/~sjoerdr/papers/DemirRienstra_Linedafterbody_hc.pdf
Koch, W. , and Möhring, W. , 1983, “ Eigensolutions for Liners in Uniform Mean Flow Ducts,” AIAA J., 21(2), pp. 200–213. [CrossRef]
Rienstra, S. W. , 1984, “ Acoustic Radiation From a Semi-Infinite Annular Duct in a Uniform Subsonic Mean Flow,” J. Sound Vib., 94(2), pp. 267–288. [CrossRef]
Noble, B. , 1958, Methods Based on the Wiener-Hopf Technique for the Solution of Partial Differential Equations, Pergamon Press, New York.
Song, W. , and Keane, A. , 2007, “ Surrogate-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Civil Aircraft Engine Nacelle,” AIAA J., 45(10), pp. 2565–2574. [CrossRef]
Myers, R. H. , Montgomery, D. C. , and Anderson-Cook, C. M. , 2016, Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Tester, B. , 1973, “ Some Aspects of Sound Attenuation in Lined Ducts Containing Inviscid Mean Flows With Boundary Layers,” J. Sound Vib., 28(2), pp. 217–245. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Flowchart for the surrogate-based liner optimization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The dimensional axial velocity field (m/s) for the practical aeroengine intake case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The case setup used for the numerical simulations. Here, the liner covers the inside wall of the inlet duct with a normalized unit length.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The model setup and the cylindrical coordinate. Here we consider a straight annular duct with semi-infinitely long hard wall (left) and semi-infinitely long lined wall (right).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Normalized cost function values with respect to liner impedance values. Other parameters are the same as Table 1: (a) numerical, 1 kHz, (b) numerical, 1.5 kHz, (c) numerical, 2 kHz, (d) numerical, 2.5 kHz, (e) Wiener–Hopf, 1 kHz, (f) Wiener–Hopf, 1.5 kHz, (g) Wiener–Hopf, 2 kHz, and (h) Wiener–Hopf, 2.5 kHz.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The near-field sound pressure solutions (11 contour levels between 65 dB and 90 dB) at f = 1 kHz, (m, n) = (4, 1) and the amplitude of the incident wave is set to 1: (a) hard wall, (b) optimized liner design with Z = 1.1283–1.4071i based on the numerical solver, and (c) optimized liner design with Z = 1.2140–1.6681i based on the analytical Wiener–Hopf solver

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The far-field directivity patterns for four frequencies between 1.0 kHz and 2.5 kHz with (m, n) = (4, 1). The impedance values can be found in Table 1. The dotted lines represent the results without acoustic liner. The dashed-dot (with ○) and solid lines show the directivity patterns with the optimized liner designs from the numerical solver and the Wiener–Hopf-based solver, respectively: (a) f = 1 kHz, (b) f = 1.5 kHz, (c) f = 2 kHz, and (d) f = 2.5 kHz.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In