0
Research Papers

Energy Harvesting From the Vibrations of Rotating Systems

[+] Author and Article Information
Christopher G. Cooley

Department of Mechanical Engineering
and Energy Processes,
Southern Illinois University Carbondale,
Carbondale, IL 62901
e-mail: chris.cooley@siu.edu

Tan Chai

Department of Mechanical Engineering
and Energy Processes,
Southern Illinois University Carbondale,
Carbondale, IL 62901
e-mail: tchai@siu.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Technical Committee on Vibration and Sound of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received December 11, 2016; final manuscript received September 11, 2017; published online October 20, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Lei Zuo.

J. Vib. Acoust 140(2), 021010 (Oct 20, 2017) (11 pages) Paper No: VIB-16-1588; doi: 10.1115/1.4038106 History: Received December 11, 2016; Revised September 11, 2017

This study investigates the vibration of and power harvested by typical electromagnetic and piezoelectric vibration energy harvesters when applied to vibrating host systems that rotate at constant speed. The governing equations for these electromechanically coupled devices are derived using Newtonian mechanics and Kirchhoff's voltage law. The natural frequency for these devices is speed-dependent due to the centripetal acceleration from their constant rotation. Resonance diagrams are used to identify excitation frequencies and speeds where these energy harvesters have large amplitude vibration and power harvested. Closed-form solutions are derived for the steady-state response and power harvested. These devices have multifrequency dynamic response due to the combined vibration and rotation of the host system. Multiple resonances are possible. The average power harvested over one oscillation cycle is calculated for a wide range of operating conditions. Electromagnetic devices have a local maximum in average harvested power that occurs near a specific excitation frequency and rotation speed. Piezoelectric devices, depending on their mechanical damping, can have two local maxima of average power harvested. Although these maxima are sensitive to small changes in the excitation frequency, they are much less sensitive to small changes in rotation speed.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Williams, C. B. , and Yates, R. B. , 1996, “ Analysis of a Micro-Electric Generator for Microsystems,” Sens. Actuators A, 52(1–3), pp. 8–11. [CrossRef]
Stephen, N. G. , 2006, “ On Energy Harvesting From Ambient Vibration,” J. Sound Vib., 293(1–2), pp. 409–425. [CrossRef]
Mann, B. P. , and Sims, N. D. , 2009, “ Energy Harvesting From the Nonlinear Oscillations of Magnetic Levitation,” J. Sound Vib., 319(1–2), pp. 515–530. [CrossRef]
Yang, B. , Lee, C. , Xiang, W. , Xie, J. , He, J. H. , Kotlanka, R. K. , Low, S. P. , and Feng, H. , 2009, “ Electromagnetic Energy Harvesting From Vibrations of Multiple Frequencies,” J. Micromech. Microeng., 19(3), p. 035001. [CrossRef]
Mann, B. P. , and Sims, N. D. , 2010, “ On the Performance and Resonant Frequency of Electromagnetic Induction Energy Harvesters,” J. Sound Vib., 329(9), pp. 1348–1361. [CrossRef]
Cammarano, A. , Burrow, S. G. , Barton, D. A. W. , Carrella, A. , and Clare, L. R. , 2010, “ Tuning a Resonant Energy Harvester Using a Generalized Electrical Load,” Smart Mater. Struct., 19(5), p. 055003. [CrossRef]
Mann, B. P. , and Owens, B. A. , 2010, “ Investigations of a Nonlinear Energy Harvester With a Bistable Potential Well,” J. Sound Vib., 329(9), pp. 1215–1226. [CrossRef]
Tang, X. , and Zuo, L. , 2011, “ Enhanced Vibration Energy Harvesting Using Dual-Mass Systems,” J. Sound Vib., 330(21), pp. 5199–5209. [CrossRef]
Daqaq, M. F. , 2011, “ Transduction of a Bistable Inductive Generator Driven by White and Exponentially Correlated Gaussian Noise,” J. Sound Vib., 330(11), pp. 2554–2564. [CrossRef]
Elvin, N. G. , and Elvin, A. A. , 2011, “ An Experimentally Validated Electromagnetic Energy Harvester,” J. Sound Vib., 330(10), pp. 2314–2324. [CrossRef]
Arafa, M. H. , 2012, “ Multi-Modal Vibration Energy Harvesting Using a Trapezoidal Plate,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 134(4), p. 041010. [CrossRef]
Green, P. L. , Worden, K. , Atallah, K. , and Sims, N. D. , 2012, “ The Benefits of Duffing-Type Nonlinearities and Electrical Optimisation of a Mono-Stable Energy Harvester Under White Gaussian Excitations,” J. Sound Vib., 331(20), pp. 4504–4517. [CrossRef]
Green, P. L. , Worden, K. , and Sims, N. D. , 2013, “ On the Identification and Modelling of Friction in a Randomly Excited Energy Harvester,” J. Sound Vib., 332(19), pp. 4696–4708. [CrossRef]
Harne, R. L. , 2013, “ Modeling and Analysis of Distributed Electromagnetic Oscillators for Broadband Vibration Attenuation and Concurrent Energy Harvesting,” Appl. Math. Model., 37(6), pp. 4360–4370. [CrossRef]
Zuo, L. , and Cui, W. , 2013, “ Dual-Functional Energy-Harvesting and Vibration Control: Electromagnetic Resonant Shunt Series Tuned Mass Dampers,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 135(5), p. 051018. [CrossRef]
He, Q. , and Daqaq, M. F. , 2014, “ Influence of Potential Function Asymmetries on the Performance of Nonlinear Energy Harvesters Under White Noise,” J. Sound Vib., 333(15), pp. 3479–3489. [CrossRef]
Ghandchi Tehrani, M. , and Elliott, S. J. , 2014, “ Extending the Dynamic Range of an Energy Harvester Using Nonlinear Damping,” J. Sound Vib., 333(3), pp. 623–629. [CrossRef]
Tang, X. , Liu, Y. , Cui, W. , and Zuo, L. , 2015, “ Analytical Solutions to H2 and H Optimizations of Resonant Shunted Electromagnetic Tuned Mass Damper and Vibration Energy Harvester,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 138(1), p. 011018. [CrossRef]
He, Q. , and Daqaq, M. F. , 2015, “ New Insights Into Utilizing Bistability for Energy Harvesting Under White Noise,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 137(2), p. 021009. [CrossRef]
Gonzalez-Buelga, A. , Clare, L. R. , Neild, S. A. , Burrow, S. G. , and Inman, D. J. , 2015, “ An Electromagnetic Vibration Absorber With Harvesting and Tuning Capabilities,” Struct. Control Health Monit., 22(11), pp. 1359–1372. [CrossRef]
Caruso, G. , 2015, “ Broadband Energy Harvesting From Vibrations Using Magnetic Transduction,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 137(6), p. 064503. [CrossRef]
Wang, X. , Liang, X. , and Wei, H. , 2015, “ A Study of Electromagnetic Vibration Energy Harvesters With Different Interface Circuits,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 58–59,pp. 376–398.
duToit, N. E. , Wardle, B. L. , and Kim, S.-G. , 2005, “ Design Considerations for Mems-Scale Piezoelectric Mechanical Vibration Energy Harvesters,” Integr. Ferroelectr., 71(1), pp. 121–160. [CrossRef]
Adhikari, S. , Friswell, M. I. , and Inman, D. J. , 2009, “ Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting From Broadband Random Vibrations,” Smart Mater. Struct., 18(11), p. 115005. [CrossRef]
Renno, J. M. , Daqaq, M. F. , and Inman, D. J. , 2009, “ On the Optimal Energy Harvesting From a Vibration Source,” J. Sound Vib., 320(1–2), pp. 386–405. [CrossRef]
Seuaciuc-Osório, T. , and Daqaq, M. F. , 2010, “ Energy Harvesting Under Excitations of Time-Varying Frequency,” J. Sound Vib., 329(13), pp. 2497–2515. [CrossRef]
Tang, L. , and Yang, Y. , 2012, “ A Multiple-Degree-of-Freedom Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Model,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 23(14), pp. 1631–1647. [CrossRef]
Xiao, H. , Wang, X. , and John, S. , 2016, “ A Multi-Degree of Freedom Piezoelectric Vibration Energy Harvester With Piezoelectric Elements Inserted Between Two Nearby Oscillators,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 68–69, pp. 138–154. [CrossRef]
Erturk, A. , and Inman, D. J. , 2008, “ A Distributed Parameter Electromechanical Model for Cantilevered Piezoelectric Energy Harvesters,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 130(4), p. 041002. [CrossRef]
Erturk, A. , and Inman, D. J. , 2009, “ An Experimentally Validated Bimorph Cantilever Model for Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting From Base Excitations,” Smart Mater. Struct., 18(2), p. 025009. [CrossRef]
Erturk, A. , Tarazaga, P. A. , Farmer, J. R. , and Inman, D. J. , 2009, “ Effect of Strain Nodes and Electrode Configuration on Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting From Cantilevered Beams,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 131(1), p. 011010. [CrossRef]
Bonello, P. , and Rafique, S. , 2010, “ Modeling and Analysis of Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Beams Using the Dynamic Stiffness and Analytical Modal Analysis Methods,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 133(1), p. 011009. [CrossRef]
Shahruz, S. M. , 2006, “ Design of Mechanical Band-Pass Filters for Energy Scavenging,” J. Sound Vib., 292(3–5), pp. 987–998. [CrossRef]
Erturk, A. , Renno, J. M. , and Inman, D. J. , 2009, “ Modeling of Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting From an L-Shaped Beam-Mass Structure With an Application to UAVs,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 20(5), pp. 529–544. [CrossRef]
Karami, M. A. , and Inman, D. J. , 2011, “ Electromechanical Modeling of the Low-Frequency Zigzag Micro-Energy Harvester,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 22(3), pp. 271–282. [CrossRef]
Masana, R. , and Daqaq, M. F. , 2010, “ Electromechanical Modeling and Nonlinear Analysis of Axially Loaded Energy Harvesters,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 133(1), p. 011007. [CrossRef]
Cottone, F. , Gammaitoni, L. , Vocca, H. , Ferrari, M. , and Ferrari, V. , 2012, “ Piezoelectric Buckled Beams for Random Vibration Energy Harvesting,” Smart Mater. Struct., 21(3), p. 035021. [CrossRef]
Harne, R. L. , and Wang, K. W. , 2015, “ Axial Suspension Compliance and Compression for Enhancing Performance of a Nonlinear Vibration Energy Harvesting Beam System,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 138(1), p. 011004. [CrossRef]
Anton, S. R. , and Sodano, H. A. , 2007, “ A Review of Power Harvesting Using Piezoelectric Materials (2003-2006),” Smart Mater. Struct., 16(3), p. R1. [CrossRef]
Harne, R. L. , and Wang, K. W. , 2013, “ A Review of the Recent Research on Vibration Energy Harvesting Via Bistable Systems,” Smart Mater. Struct., 22(2), p. 023001. [CrossRef]
Daqaq, M. F. , Masana, R. , Erturk, A. , and Quinn, D. D. , 2014, “ On the Role of Nonlinearities in Vibratory Energy Harvesting: A Critical Review and Discussion,” ASME Appl. Mech. Rev., 66(4), p. 040801. [CrossRef]
Yeatman, E. M. , 2008, “ Energy Harvesting From Motion Using Rotating and Gyroscopic Proof Masses,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C, 222(1), pp. 27–36. [CrossRef]
Trimble, A. Z. , Lang, J. H. , Pabon, J. , and Slocum, A. , 2010, “ A Device for Harvesting Energy From Rotational Vibrations,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 132(9), p. 091001. [CrossRef]
Gu, L. , and Livermore, C. , 2010, “ Passive Self-Tuning Energy Harvester for Extracting Energy From Rotational Motion,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 97(8), p. 081904. [CrossRef]
Khameneifar, F. , Moallem, M. , and Arzanpour, S. , 2011, “ Modeling and Analysis of a Piezoelectric Energy Scavenger for Rotary Motion Applications,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 133(1), p. 011005. [CrossRef]
Gu, L. , and Livermore, C. , 2012, “ Compact Passively Self-Tuning Energy Harvesting for Rotating Applications,” Smart Mater. Struct., 21(1), p. 015002. [CrossRef]
Guan, M. , and Liao, W.-H. , 2016, “ Design and Analysis of a Piezoelectric Energy Harvester for Rotational Motion System,” Energy Convers. Manage., 111, pp. 239–244. [CrossRef]
Roundy, S. , and Tola, J. , 2014, “ Energy Harvester for Rotating Environments Using Offset Pendulum and Nonlinear Dynamics,” Smart Mater. Struct., 23(10), p. 105004. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of a (a) rotating host system with prescribed translation y(t), (b) electromagnetic vibration energy harvester, and (c) piezoelectric vibration energy harvester

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Resonance diagram for rotating electromagnetic vibration energy harvesters at (a) ω = 0.5 and varying nondimensional rotation speed and (b) Ω = 0.3 and varying nondimensional excitation frequency. The solid lines are the device's natural frequency. The dashed (red) lines are excitation frequencies at |Ω±ω|. The device has ζ = β = 0.01 and ρ = 10.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Nondimensional dynamic response amplitude and phase for the electromagnetic vibration energy harvester at ω = 0.50 for varying nondimensional rotation speed. The dotted (red) and dashed (blue) lines are the response amplitudes A2,1 and phase angles χ2,1 at frequencies Ω ± ω, respectively. The solid (black) line is the rms of the response calculated from Arms=A12+A22. The device has ζ = β = 0.01 and ρ = 10.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Nondimensional dynamic response amplitude and phase for the electromagnetic vibration energy harvester at Ω = 0.30 for varying nondimensional excitation frequency. The dotted (red) and dashed (blue) lines are response amplitudes A2,1 and phase angles χ2,1 at frequencies Ω ± ω, respectively. The solid (black) line is the rms calculated from Arms=A12+A22. The device has ζ = β = 0.01 and ρ = 10.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Nondimensional average power harvested by the electromagnetic vibration energy harvester at ω = 0.50 for varying nondimensional rotation speed. The device has ζ = β = 0.01 and ρ = 10.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Nondimensional average power harvested for the electromagnetic vibration energy harvester at Ω = 0.30 for varying nondimensional excitation frequency. The device has ζ = β = 0.01 and ρ = 10.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

(a) Contour plot of the nondimensional average power harvested by the electromagnetic vibration energy harvester for varying nondimensional rotation speed and excitation frequency. (b) Region shown by the dashed (red) line in (a). The device has ζ = β = 0.01 and ρ = 10.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Maximum nondimensional average power harvested by an electromagnetic device for varying nondimensional viscous damping coefficient. The solid line is the maxima for the rotating device. The circle markers are maxima for the stationary device.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Nondimensional (a) electrical damping coefficient, (b) excitation frequency, and (c) rotation speed at the maximum average power harvested by an electromagnetic device for varying nondimensional viscous damping coefficient. The circle markers in (a) are results for an identical stationary device. The dotted (red) lines are (a) β = ζ, (b) ω=2, and (c) Ω=2/2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Nondimensional natural frequencies of rotating piezoelectric vibration energy harvesters with α = 0.1, 1, 10 for varying nondimensional rotation speed. The dashed (red) lines are excitation frequencies |Ω±ω|. The device has ζ = 0.01, γ = 0.2, and ρ = 10.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Contour plots of the rms of the nondimensional (a) proof mass deflection Urms=U12+U22 and (b) electric circuit voltage Vrms=V12+V22 for the spinning piezoelectric vibration energy harvester for varying nondimensional rotation speed Ω and excitation frequency ω. The device has ζ = 0.01, γ = 0.2, α = 0.1, and ρ = 10.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

(a) Contour plot of the nondimensional average power harvested by the rotating piezoelectric vibration energy harvester for varying nondimensional rotation speed Ω and excitation frequency ω. (b) Region shown in the dashed (red) box in (a). The device has ζ = 0.01, γ = 0.2, α = 0.1, and ρ = 10.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Maximum nondimensional average power harvested by a rotating piezoelectric vibration energy harvester with γ = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 for varying nondimensional viscous damping coefficient ζ. The markers denote the maximum average power harvested by a corresponding stationary device.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Nondimensional (a) resistance α, (b) excitation frequency ω, and (c) rotation speed Ω for varying nondimensional viscous damping coefficient ζ at the maxima of rotating piezoelectric vibration energy harvesters with γ = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In