Research Papers

Dynamics of Slightly Curved Pipe Conveying Hot Pressurized Fluid Resting on Linear and Nonlinear Viscoelastic Foundations

[+] Author and Article Information
O. D. Owoseni

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Lagos,
Lagos 100213, Nigeria
e-mail: owosenid@yahoo.com

K. O. Orolu

Department of Systems Engineering,
University of Lagos,
Lagos 100213, Nigeria
e-mail: korolu@unilag.edu.ng

A. A. Oyediran

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Lagos,
Lagos 100213, Nigeria
e-mail: ayooyediran@hotmail.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Technical Committee on Vibration and Sound of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received April 14, 2017; final manuscript received August 9, 2017; published online October 4, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Stefano Lenci.

J. Vib. Acoust 140(2), 021005 (Oct 04, 2017) (13 pages) Paper No: VIB-17-1156; doi: 10.1115/1.4037703 History: Received April 14, 2017; Revised August 09, 2017

One of the most important facilities in the oil and gas industry is the pipeline. These pipelines convey high pressure with high temperature (HPHT) fluids and transit several kilometers traveling through different seafloor soils. The topography of seabed which acts as viscoelastic foundation to the pipeline is rough and irregular, thereby making the pipelines to be slightly curved. This erratic behavior of these soils presents several problems to the constructor and threatens the lifespan of the pipeline. The nonlinear governing partial differential equations (PDEs) were derived and solved using energy and eigenfunction expansion methods, respectively. The resultant ordinary differential equations (ODEs) were truncated after the fourth mode and solved numerically using eighth-seventh order Runge–Kutta code in matlab. Two types of foundations were investigated: both with viscous damping but one was with linear spring, while the other was with nonlinear spring. Bifurcation and orbit diagrams with their corresponding phase portraits that show periodic and chaotic motions of the system trajectories are generated and presented. It was examined that foundation, initial curvature, and tension could stiffen the pipe, while pressure and temperature did the rule of softening. Nonlinear stiffness made the pipe to undergo chaotic oscillation which was absent in the linear case, meaning that linear foundations could enhance the life span of pipelines than the nonlinear ones.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Paidoussis, M. P. , 2014, Fluid-Structure Interactions: Slender Structures and Axial Flow, Academic Press, London.
Ibrahim, A. , 2010, “ Overview of Mechanics of Pipes Conveying Fluids—Part 1: Fundamental Studies,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 132(3), pp. 1–32. http://www.ewp.rpi.edu/hartford/~ernesto/S2012/EP/MaterialsforStudents/Marderness/Ibrahim2011-P1.pdf
Blevins, R. , 1977, Flow-Induced Vibrations, Van-Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Rehfield, L. W. , 1974, “ Nonlinear Flexural Oscillations of Shallow Arches,” AIAA J., 12(1), pp. 91–93. [CrossRef]
Sinir, B. G. , 2010, “ Bifurcation and Chaos of Slightly Curved Pipes,” Math. Comput. Appl., 15(3), pp. 490–502.
Oz, H. R. , Pakdemirli, M. , Ozkaya, E. , and Yilmaz, M. , 1998, “ Non-Linear Vibration of a Slightly Curved Beam Resting on a Non-Linear Elastic Foundation,” J. Sound Vib., 212(2), pp. 295–309. [CrossRef]
Lottati, I. , and Kornecki, A. , 1986, “ The Effect of an Elastic Foundation and of Dissipative Forces on the Stability of Fluid-Conveying Pipes,” J. Sound Vib., 109(2), pp. 327–338. [CrossRef]
Djondjorov, P. , Vassilev, V. , and Dzhupanov, V. , 2001, “ Dynamic Stability of Fluid Conveying Cantilevered Pipes on Elastic Foundations,” J. Sound Vib., 247(3), pp. 537–546. [CrossRef]
Paidoussis, M. P. , Li, G. X. , and Moon, F. C. , 1989, “ Chaotic Oscillations of the Autonomous System of a Constrained Pipe Conveying Fluid,” J. Sound Vib., 135(1), pp. 1–19. [CrossRef]
Mostafa, N. H. , 2014, “ Effect of a Viscoelastic Foundation on the Dynamic Stability of a Fluid Conveying Pipe,” Int. J. Appl. Sci. Eng., 12(1), pp. 59–74. http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?docid=17272394-201403-201403270032-201403270032-59-74
Owoseni, O. D. , 2015, “ Dynamics of Slightly Curved Pipe Conveying Hot Fluid Resting on Viscoelastic Foundations,” M.Sc. thesis, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.
Paidoussis, M. P. , and Issid, N. T. , 1974, “ Dynamic Stability of Pipes Conveying Fluid,” J. Sound Vib., 33(3), pp. 267–294. [CrossRef]
Wang, L. , Dai, H. L. , and Qian, Q. , 2012, “ Dynamics of Simply Supported Fluid Conveying Pipes With Geometric Imperfections,” J. Fluids Struct., 29, pp. 97–106. [CrossRef]
Marakala, N. , Kuttan, A. K. , and Kadoli, K. , 2009, “ Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Combined Effect of Fluid and Thermal Induced Vibration on Vertical Thin Slender Tube,” IOSR J. Mech. Civ. Eng., 2, pp. 63–68. http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jmce/papers/sicete(mech)-volume2/22.pdf
Semler, C. , Li, G. X. , and Paidoussis, M. P. , 1994, “ The Nonlinear Equations of Motion of Pipes Conveying Fluids,” J. Sound Vib., 169(5), pp. 577–599. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Slightly curved simply supported pipe conveying hot pressurized fluid and resting on viscoelastic foundations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Effect of Winkler foundation on the pipe conveying fluid

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Effect of mass ratio on the critical velocity of flow at (a) β = 0.2, (b) β = 0.4, and (c) β = 0.8

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Effects of foundation viscoelastic damping with fluid viscosity on the pipe conveying fluid at (a) μ0 = 0 and (b) μ0 = 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effect of initial curvature on the pipe conveying fluid at (a) various values of a, (b) a = 0, (c) a = 0.25, (d) a = 0.50, (e) a = 0.75, and (f) a = 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effect of pretension on the pipe conveying fluid

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Effects of hot and pressurized fluid on the pipe: (a) temperature and (b) pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Effect of nonlinear elastic foundation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Phase plane plot of the effect of elastic foundation at (a) K = 0, (b) K = 50, (c) K = 100, (d) K = 150, and (e) K = 200

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Effect of mass ratio at (a) β = 0.2, (b) β = 0.4, and (c) β = 0.8

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Effect of fluid viscosity and viscous foundation on the pipe: (a) viscosity and (b) viscous foundation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Effect of initial curvature at (b) a = 0, (c) a = 0.25, (d) a = 0.50, (e) a = 0.75, and (f) a = 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Effect of pretension

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Evolution of phase portraits of pretension at (a) T = 0, (b) T = 5, (c) T = 10, and (d) T = 15

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Effect of (a) temperature and (b) pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Route to chaos: (a) bifurcation diagram, (b) orbital diagram, and (c) phase plane plot of orbital diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Superimposed plots: (a) bifurcation diagram and (b) phase plane plot




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In