0
Research Papers

Application of Inverse Patch Transfer Functions Method With Wideband Holography Algorithm to Sparsely Distributed Sources Identification

[+] Author and Article Information
Yansong He

School of Automotive Engineering,
Chongqing University,
Chongqing 400044, China
e-mail: hys68@cqu.edu.cn

Chong Liu

School of Automotive Engineering,
Chongqing University,
Chongqing 400044, China
e-mail: liuchong_cqu@cqu.edu.cn

Zhongming Xu

School of Automotive Engineering,
Chongqing University,
Chongqing 400044, China
e-mail: xuzm@cqu.edu.cn

Zhifei Zhang

School of Automotive Engineering,
Chongqing University,
Chongqing 400044, China
e-mail: z.zhang@cqu.edu.cn

Shu Li

School of Automotive Engineering,
Chongqing University,
Chongqing 400044, China
e-mail: leeshu@cqu.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Technical Committee on Vibration and Sound of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received November 22, 2016; final manuscript received June 27, 2017; published online September 7, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Sheryl M. Grace.

J. Vib. Acoust 140(1), 011008 (Sep 07, 2017) (10 pages) Paper No: VIB-16-1556; doi: 10.1115/1.4037471 History: Received November 22, 2016; Revised June 27, 2017

Inverse patch transfer functions (iPTF) method has been developed to reconstruct the sound field of irregularly shaped sources in a noisy environment. The iPTF method, which uses classic regularization methods to solve the ill-posed problems generally, would incur some sidelobes ghosting in the process of identifying sparse sources. In view of the fact that the algorithm in wideband holography (WBH) can promote sparsity of results, a technique combining iPTF method with WBH algorithm is proposed to identify sparsely distributed sources in the present work. In the proposed technique, double layer pressure measurements are used to replace the measurements of the pressure and normal velocity which uses costly p-u probes. A gradient descent algorithm and a filtering process are applied to solve the minimization problem of identifying the normal velocities of target sources, which can suppress ghosting sources rapidly by an iterative process. In simulations, the field reconstruction results of two antiphase square piston sources show good sparsity and accuracy by employing the technique, nearly without ghosting sources. At different distances and frequencies of the two sources, the technique still performs well. Experimental validations at 200 Hz and 400 Hz are carried out in the end. The results of experiments are also coinciding with those of simulations.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Maynard, J. D. , Williams, E. G. , and Lee, Y. , 1985, “ Nearfield Acoustic Holography: I. Theory of Generalized Holography and the Development of NAH,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 78(4), pp. 1395–1413. [CrossRef]
Veronesi, W. A. , and Maynard, J. D. , 1987, “ Nearfield Acoustic Holography (NAH) II. Holographic Reconstruction Algorithms and Computer Implementation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 81(5), pp. 1307–1322. [CrossRef]
Bai, M. R. , 1992, “ Application of BEM (Boundary Element Method)-Based Acoustic Holography to Radiation Analysis of Sound Sources With Arbitrarily Shaped Geometries,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 92(1), pp. 533–549. [CrossRef]
Schuhmacher, A. , Hald, J. , Rasmussen, K. B. , and Hansen, P. C. , 2003, “ Sound Source Reconstruction Using Inverse Boundary Element Calculations,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 113(1), pp. 114–127. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bi, C. X. , 2005, “ Nearfield Acoustic Holography Based on the Equivalent Source Method,” Sci. China, Ser. E: Eng. Mater. Sci., 48(3), pp. 338–353. [CrossRef]
Chu, Z. , Ping, G. , Cai, P. , Yang, Y. , and Chen, C. , 2015, “ Application of Bayesian Regularization Criterion in Near Field Acoustic Holography Based on Equivalent Source Method,” Noise Vib. Worldwide, 46(6), pp. 20–28. [CrossRef]
Hald, J. , 2009, “ Basic Theory and Properties of Statistically Optimized Near-Field Acoustical Holography,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 125(4), pp. 2105–2120. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jacobsen, F. , and Jaud, V. , 2007, “ Statistically Optimized Near Field Acoustic Holography Using an Array of Pressure–Velocity Probes,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 121(3), pp. 1550–1560. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jacobsen, F. , Chen, X. , and Jaud, V. , 2008, “ A Comparison of Statistically Optimized Near Field Acoustic Holography Using Single Layer Pressure–Velocity Measurements and Using Double Layer Pressure Measurements,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 123(4), pp. 1842–1845. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hald, J. , 2016, “ Fast Wideband Acoustical Holography,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 139(4), pp. 1508–1518. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hald, J. , 2014, “ Wideband Acoustical Holography,” 43rd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering, Melbourne, Australia, Nov. 16–19, Paper No. 44. http://www.sandv.com/downloads/1604gade.pdf
Aucejo, M. , Totaro, N. , and Guyader, J. L. , 2010, “ Identification of Source Velocities on 3D Structures in Non-Anechoic Environments: Theoretical Background and Experimental Validation of the Inverse Patch Transfer Functions Method,” J. Sound Vib., 329(18), pp. 3691–3708. [CrossRef]
Xiang, S. , Jiang, W. , and Pan, S. , 2015, “ Sound Source Identification in a Noisy Environment Based on Inverse Patch Transfer Functions With Evanescent Green's Functions,” J. Sound Vib., 359, pp. 68–83. [CrossRef]
Totaro, N. , Vigoureux, D. , Leclère, Q. , Lagneaux, J. , and Guyader, J. L. , 2015, “ Sound Fields Separation and Reconstruction of Irregularly Shaped Sources,” J. Sound Vib., 336, pp. 62–81. [CrossRef]
Totaro, N. , and Guyader, J. L. , 2012, “ Efficient Positioning of Absorbing Material in Complex Systems by Using the Patch Transfer Function Method,” J. Sound Vib., 331(13), pp. 3130–3143. [CrossRef]
Vigoureux, D. , Totaro, N. , Lagneaux, J. , and Guyader, J.-L. , 2014, “ Inverse Patch Transfer Functions Method as a Tool for Source Field Identification,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 137(2), p. 021006. [CrossRef]
Totaro, N. , Forget, S. , and Guyader, J. L. , 2015, “ iPTF Methods: How Green's Identity and FEM Solver Can Be Used for Acoustic Inverse Methods,” Tenth European Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering (EuroNoise), Maastricht, The Netherlands, June 1–3, pp. 903–908. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01282531/document
Forget, S. , Totaro, N. , Guyader, J. L. , and Schaeffer, M. , 2016, “ Source Fields Reconstruction With 3D Mapping by Means of the Virtual Acoustic Volume Concept,” J. Sound Vib., 381, pp. 48–64. [CrossRef]
Forget, S. , Totaro, N. , Guyader, J. L. , and Schaeffer, M. , 2016, “ A Noise Source Identification Method as an Analysis Support Technique to Improve NVH Performances of 3D Structures,” SAE Paper No. 2016-01-1793.
Aucejo, M. , Totaro, N. , and Guyader, J. L. , 2008, “ Identification of Source Velocities With Inverse Patch Transfer Functions Method,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 123(5), p. 3310. [CrossRef]
Kinsler, L. E. , Coppens, A. B. , and Sanders, J. V. , 1999, Fundamentals of Acoustics, 4th ed., Wiley, New York.
Jacobsen, F. , and Jaud, V. , 2006, “ A Note on the Calibration of Pressure–Velocity Sound Intensity Probes,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 120(2), pp. 830–837. [CrossRef]
Cheng, M. T. , Mann, J. A. , and Pate, A. , 1996, “ Sensitivity of the Wave-Number Domain Field Separation Methods for Scattering,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 99(6), pp. 3550–3557. [CrossRef]
Nelson, P. A. , and Yoon, S. H. , 2000, “ Estimation of Acoustic Source Strength by Inverse Methods: Part I, Conditioning of the Inverse Problem,” J. Sound Vib., 233(4), pp. 639–664. [CrossRef]
Yoon, S. H. , and Nelson, P. A. , 2000, “ Estimation of Acoustic Source Strength by Inverse Methods: Part II, Experimental Investigation of Methods for Choosing Regularization Parameters,” J. Sound Vib., 233(4), pp. 665–701. [CrossRef]
Ouisse, M. , Maxit, L. , Cacciolati, C. , and Guyader, J. L. , 2005, “ Patch Transfer Functions as a Tool to Couple Linear Acoustic Problems,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 127(5), pp. 458–466. [CrossRef]
Allemang, R. , 2003, “ The Modal Assurance Criterion Twenty Years of Use and Abuse,” J. Sound Vib., 37(8), pp. 14–23. http://www.sandv.com/downloads/0308alle.pdf

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Definition of the closed virtual cavity Ω and its boundary surfaces

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic diagram of double layer pressure measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Definition of (a) two baffled piston sources in antiphase and (b) patches meshed on the virtual surfaces around sources

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

All hologram surfaces required for double layer pressure measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The condition number of patch impedance matrices for maximal order of modes extracted up to (-) 9 × 9 × 1, (--) 13 × 13 × 5, (•••) 15 × 15 × 7, and (-•) 18 × 18 × 10

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The pressure distributions of patches on the virtual surface S0 at 400 Hz: (a) without a disturbing source and (b) with a disturbing source

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Source velocities distribution at 400 Hz of (a) theoretical values and reconstructed results obtained using (b) WBH algorithm (ζ = 4.15%) and (c) Tikhonov regularization (ζ = 11.86%)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Source velocities distribution at 400 Hz with 15 dB SNR noise of (a) reconstructed results obtained using WBH algorithm (ζ = 5.97%) and (b) Tikhonov regularization (ζ = 26.0%)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Performance of the iPTF method with WBH algorithm ((a) and (c)) and Tikhonov regularization ((b) and (d)) at different distances between the two sources at 400 Hz

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

CSNRs of the target sources to a disturbing source on virtual surfaces within a frequency band range

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Relative errors of the source velocities reconstructed by (–) the iPTF method with Tikhonov regularization and (-) the iPTF method with WBH algorithm with both the disturbing sources and 15 dB SNR noise

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

RVAC computed between the reference source velocity field identified by (-) the iPTF method with WBH algorithm and (–) the iPTF method with Tikhonov regularization adding both the disturbing source and 15 dB SNR noise

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Experiment setup and measurements: (a) two baffled loudspeakers, a thick wooden, a phase preference microphone, and three measurement microphones and (b) diagram of measurements on side hologram surfaces

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Comparison of source velocities distribution results obtained by the iPTF method with Tikhonov regularization and the iPTF method with WBH algorithm, respectively, at 200 Hz ((a) and (b)) and at 400 Hz ((c) and (d))

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In