0
Research Papers

A Two-Stage Model for Energy Transmission and Radiation Analysis of Laminated Composite Double-Leaf Structures

[+] Author and Article Information
Atanu Sahu

Mem. ASME
Department of Civil Engineering,
Jadavpur University,
188, Raja S. C. Mallik Road,
Kolkata 700032, India
e-mail: atanush@gmail.com

Arup Guha Niyogi

Department of Civil Engineering,
Jadavpur University,
188, Raja S. C. Mallik Road,
Kolkata 700032, India
e-mail: agn_ju@yahoo.com

Michael Rose

Institute of Composite Structures and Adaptive Systems,
German Aerospace Center (DLR),
Lilienthalplatz 7,
Braunschweig 38108, Germany
e-mail: michael.rose@dlr.de

Partha Bhattacharya

Department of Civil Engineering,
Jadavpur University,
188, Raja S. C. Mallik Road,
Kolkata 700032, India
e-mail: p_bhatta@daad-alumni.de

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Noise Control and Acoustics Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received August 20, 2016; final manuscript received March 17, 2017; published online May 30, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Ronald N. Miles.

J. Vib. Acoust 139(4), 041008 (May 30, 2017) (13 pages) Paper No: VIB-16-1404; doi: 10.1115/1.4036390 History: Received August 20, 2016; Revised March 17, 2017

A two-stage numerical model is developed to understand the energy transmission characteristics through a finite double-leaf structure placed in an infinite baffle subjected to an external excitation and subsequently the sound radiation behavior of the same into the semi-infinite receiving side. In the first stage, a mobility-based coupled finite element–boundary element (FE–BE) technique is implemented to model the energy transmission from the primary panel to the secondary panel through an air gap. In the second stage, a separate boundary element (BE)-based model is developed to estimate the sound power radiated by the radiating (secondary) panel into the receiving side which is assumed to be semi-infinite. The advantage of the proposed approach is that it is sufficient to mesh the structural panels alone, thereby reducing the problem dimensions and the difficulty in modeling. Moreover, the developed model can be easily implemented for structures made up of various constituent materials (isotropic or laminated composites) with complex boundary conditions and varying panel geometries. Numerical experiments are carried out for different material models by varying air-gap thicknesses and also by introducing alternate energy transmission path in terms of mechanical links and the obtained results are discussed.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Cazzolato, B. S. , 1999, “ Sensing System for Active Control of Sound Transmission Into Cavities,” Ph.D. thesis, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Beranek, L. L. , and Work, G. A. , 1949, “ Sound Transmission Through Multiple Structures Containing Flexible Blankets,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 21(4), pp. 419–428. [CrossRef]
London, A. , 1950, “ Transmission of Reverberant Sound Through Double Walls,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 22(2), pp. 270–279. [CrossRef]
Price, A. J. , and Crocker, M. J. , 1970, “ Sound Transmission Through Double Panels Using Statistical Energy Analysis,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 47(3), pp. 683–693. [CrossRef]
Donato, R. J. , 1972, “ Sound Transmission Through a Double-Leaf Wall,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 51(3), pp. 807–815. [CrossRef]
Takahashi, D. , 1983, “ Sound Radiation From Periodically Connected Double-Plate Structures,” J. Sound Vib., 90(4), pp. 541–557. [CrossRef]
Yairia, M. , Sakagami, K. , Sakagami, E. , Morimoto, M. , Minemura, A. , and Andow, K. , 2002, “ Sound Radiation From a Double-Leaf Elastic Plate With a Point Force Excitation: Effect of an Interior Panel on the Structure-Borne Sound Radiation,” Appl. Acoust., 63(7), pp. 737–757. [CrossRef]
Wang, J. , Lu, T. J. , Woodhouse, J. , Langley, R. S. , and Evans, J. , 2005, “ Sound Transmission Through Lightweight Double-Leaf Partitions: Theoretical Modelling,” J. Sound Vib., 286(4–5), pp. 817–847. [CrossRef]
White, P. H. , and Powell, A. , 1966, “ Transmission of Random Sound and Vibration Through a Rectangular Double Wall,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 40(4), pp. 821–832. [CrossRef]
Cheng, L. , Li, Y. Y. , and Gao, J. X. , 2005, “ Energy Transmission in a Mechanically-Linked Double-Wall Structure Coupled to an Acoustic Enclosure,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 117(5), pp. 2742–2751. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Leppington, F. G. , Broadbent, E. G. , and Butler, G. F. , 2006, “ Transmission of Sound Through a Pair of Rectangular Elastic Plates,” IMA J. Appl. Math., 71(6), pp. 940–955. [CrossRef]
Xin, F. X. , Lu, T. J. , and Chen, C. Q. , 2009, “ Dynamic Response and Acoustic Radiation of Double-Leaf Metallic Panel Partition Under Sound Excitation,” Comput. Mater. Sci., 46(3), pp. 728–732. [CrossRef]
Xin, F. X. , Lu, T. J. , and Chen, C. Q. , 2010, “ Sound Transmission Through Simply Supported Finite Double-Panel Partitions With Enclosed Air Cavity,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 132(1), p. 011008.
Shi, S. , Jin, G. , and Liu, Z. , 2014, “ Vibro-Acoustic Behaviors of an Elastically Restrained Double-Panel Structure With an Acoustic Cavity of Arbitrary Boundary Impedance,” Appl. Acoust., 76, pp. 431–444. [CrossRef]
Xin, F. X. , and Lu, T. J. , 2009, “ Analytical and Experimental Investigation on Transmission Loss of Clamped Double Panels: Implication of Boundary Effects,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 125(3), pp. 1506–1517. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Xin, F. X. , Lu, T. J. , and Chen, C. Q. , 2008, “ Vibroacoustic Behavior of Clamp Mounted Double-Panel Partition With Enclosure Air Cavity,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 124(6), pp. 3604–3612. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Arjunan, A. , Wang, C. J. , Yahiaoui, K. , Mynors, D. J. , Morgan, T. , and English, M. , 2013, “ Finite Element Acoustic Analysis of a Steel Stud Based Double-Leaf Wall,” Build. Environ., 67, pp. 202–210. [CrossRef]
Arjunan, A. , Wang, C. J. , Yahiaoui, K. , Mynors, D. J. , Morgan, T. , and Nguyen, V. B. , 2014, “ Development of a 3D Finite Element Acoustic Model to Predict the Sound Reduction Index of Stud Based Double-Leaf Walls,” J. Sound Vib., 333(23), pp. 6140–6155. [CrossRef]
Ghosh, S. , and Bhattacharya, P. , 2015, “ Energy Transmission Through a Double-Wall Curved Stiffened Panel Using Green's Theorem,” J. Sound Vib., 342, pp. 218–240. [CrossRef]
Shen, C. , Xin, F. X. , and Lu, T. J. , 2016, “ Sound Transmission Across Composite Laminate Sandwiches: Influence of Orthogonal Stiffeners and Laminate Layup,” Compos. Struct., 143, pp. 310–316. [CrossRef]
Griese, D. , Summers, J. D. , and Thompson, L. , 2015, “ The Effect of Honeycomb Core Geometry on the Sound Transmission Performance of Sandwich Panels,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 137(2), p. 021011.
Suzuki, S. , Maruyama, S. , and Ido, H. , 1989, “ Boundary Element Analysis of Cavity Noise Problems With Complicated Boundary Conditions,” J. Sound Vib., 130(1), pp. 79–96. [CrossRef]
Sgard, F. C. , Atalla, N. , and Nicolas, J. , 2000, “ A Numerical Model for the Low Frequency Diffuse Field Sound Transmission Loss of Double-Wall Sound Barriers With Elastic Porous Linings,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 108(6), pp. 2865–2872. [CrossRef]
Coyette, J. P. , and Van de Peer, J. , 1994, “ Acoustic Boundary Elements, Advanced Techniques in Applied and Numerical Acoustics,” ISAAC 5, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, Sept. 17–19, pp. 1–31.
Seybert, A. F. , and Cheng, C. Y. R. , 1987, “ Application of the Boundary Element Method to Acoustic Cavity Response and Muffler Analysis,” J. Vib. Acoust. Stress Reliab. Des., 109(1), pp. 15–21. [CrossRef]
Guha Niyogi, A. , Laha, M. K. , and Sinha, P. K. , 2000, “ Coupled FE–BE Analysis of Acoustic Cavities Confined Inside Laminated Composite Enclosures,” Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol., 72(4), pp. 345–357. [CrossRef]
Fahy, F. , and Gardonio, P. , 2007, Sound and Structural Vibration: Radiation, Transmission and Response, 2nd ed., Academic Press, Oxford, UK.
Seybert, A. F. , and Wu, T. W. , 1989, “ Modified Helmholtz Integral Equation for Bodies Sitting on an Infinite Plane,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 85(1), pp. 19–23. [CrossRef]
Lachat, C. , and Watson, J. O. , 1976, “ Effective Numerical Treatment of Boundary Integral Equations: A Formulation for Three-Dimensional Elastostatics,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 10(5), pp. 991–1005. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the double leaf structure in an infinite baffle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

An arbitrary shaped vibrating body enclosing a finite acoustic domain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Flowchart explaining the scheme of analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Averaged quadratic velocity spectra in decibels (reference: 2.5 × 10−15 m2 s−2) for panels for isotropic (aluminum) double-leaf structure with an air-gap thickness of 0.33 m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

(a) Experimental setup: 1, frame; 2, aluminum panel (dimensions indicated) point supported at four corners, (b) schematic of the measurement setup, and (c) measurement of plate velocity with the vibrometer and measurement of sound intensity with the intensity probe

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of the BE estimate of the radiated sound intensity (reference: 10−12 W/m2) with the experimental data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Radiated sound power from panel b in decibels (reference: 10−12 W) for case I (isotropic double-leaf structure with air gap of 0.33 m thick)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Schematic of the alignment of the fiber with respect to the global axis in a lamina

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Averaged quadratic velocity spectra in decibels (reference: 2.5 × 10−15 m2 s−2) for uncoupled response of panel a only (made of aluminum and carbon-fiber-epoxy composite material)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Averaged quadratic velocity spectra in decibels (reference: 2.5 × 10−15 m2 s−2) for the orthotropic double-leaf structure with entrapped air gap of 0.33 m thick

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Radiated sound power from panel b in decibels (reference: 10−12 W) for case II (laminated composite double-leaf structure with air gap of 0.33 m thick)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Averaged quadratic velocity plots in decibels (reference: 2.5 × 10−15 m2 s−2) for the orthotropic double-leaf structure (air gap = 0.1 m)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Radiated sound power from panel b in decibels (reference: 10−12 W) for the orthotropic double-leaf structure with air gap of 0.1 m thick (case III)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Radiated sound power in decibels (reference: 10−12 W) from the double-leaf structure when panel a is made of aluminum and panel b is made of orthotropic material with varying lamina sequences (case IV)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Comparison of the averaged quadratic velocity in decibels (reference: 2.5 × 10−15 m2 s−2) for a double-wall configuration, with link and without link

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Comparison of the radiated sound power in decibels (reference: 10−12 W) from a double-wall structure, with link and without link

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Kinetic energy ratios of the panels for different isotropic and orthotropic cases

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

ETI for different isotropic and orthotropic cases

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In