Technical Brief

A Six Degrees-of-Freedom Vibration Isolation Platform Supported by a Hexapod of Quasi-Zero-Stiffness Struts

[+] Author and Article Information
Jiaxi Zhou

College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering,
Hunan University,
Changsha 410082, China
e-mail: jxizhou@hnu.edu.cn

Kai Wang

College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering,
Hunan University,
Changsha 410082, China
e-mail: wangkai@hnu.edu.cn

Daolin Xu

College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering;State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and
Manufacturing for Vehicle Body,
Changsha 410082, China
e-mail: dlxu@hnu.edu.cn

Huajiang Ouyang

School of Engineering,
University of Liverpool,
Liverpool L69 3GH, UK
e-mail: h.ouyang@liverpool.ac.uk

Yingli Li

School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,
Central South University,
Changsha 410082, China
e-mail: liyingli@hnu.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Technical Committee on Vibration and Sound of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received July 23, 2016; final manuscript received January 3, 2017; published online April 18, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Patrick S. Keogh.

J. Vib. Acoust 139(3), 034502 (Apr 18, 2017) (5 pages) Paper No: VIB-16-1365; doi: 10.1115/1.4035715 History: Received July 23, 2016; Revised January 03, 2017

A platform supported by a hexapod of quasi-zero-stiffness (QZS) struts is proposed to provide a solution for low-frequency vibration isolation in six degrees-of-freedom (6DOFs). The QZS strut is developed by combining a pair of mutually repelling permanent magnets in parallel connection with a coil spring. Dynamic analysis of the 6DOFs QZS platform is carried out to obtain dynamic responses by using the harmonic balance method, and the vibration isolation performance in each DOF is evaluated in terms of force/moment transmissibility, which indicates that the QZS platform perform a good function of low-frequency vibration isolation within broad bandwidth, and has notable advantages over its linear counterpart in all 6DOFs.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Rivin, E. I. , 2003, Passive Vibration Isolation, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Press, New York.
Alabuzhev, P. , Gritchin, A. , Kim, L. , Migirenko, G. , Chon, V. , and Stepanov, P. , 1989, Vibration Protecting and Measuring System With Quasi-Zero Stiffness, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
Cao, Q. , Wiercigroch, M. , Pavlovskaia, E. E. , Grebogi, C. , Thompson, T. , and Michael, J. , 2006, “ Archetypal Oscillator for Smooth and Discontinuous Dynamics,” Phys. Rev. E, 74(4), p. 046218. [CrossRef]
Abolfathil, A. , Brennan, M. J. , Waters, T. P. , and Tang, B. , 2015, “ On the Effects of Mistuning a Force-Excited System Containing a Quasi-Zero-Stiffness Vibration Isolator,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 137(4), p. 044502. [CrossRef]
Xu, D. , Zhang, Y. , Zhou, J. , and Lou, J. , 2014, “ On the Analytical and Experimental Assessment of Performance of a Quasi-Zero-Stiffness Isolator,” J. Vib. Control, 20(15), pp. 2314–2325. [CrossRef]
Xu, D. , Yu, Q. , Zhou, J. , and Bishop, S. R. , 2013, “ Theoretical and Experimental Analyses of a Nonlinear Magnetic Vibration Isolator With Quasi-Zero-Stiffness Characteristic,” J. Sound Vib., 332(14), pp. 3377–3389. [CrossRef]
Zhou, J. , Wang, X. , Xu, D. , and Bishop, S. , 2015, “ Nonlinear Dynamic Characteristics of a Quasi-Zero Stiffness Vibration Isolator With Cam-Oller-Pring Mechanisms,” J. Sound Vib., 346, pp. 53–69. [CrossRef]
Fulcher, B. , Shahan, D. , Haberman, M. , Seepersad, C. C. , and Wilson, P. , 2014, “ Analytical and Experimental Investigation of Buckled Beams as Negative Stiffness Elements for Passive Vibration and Shock Isolation Systems,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 136(3), p. 031009. [CrossRef]
Sun, X. , and Jing, X. , 2015, “ Multi-Direction Vibration Isolation With Quasi-Zero Stiffness by Employing Geometrical Nonlinearity,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 62–63, pp. 149–163. [CrossRef]
Shan, Y. , Chen, X. , and Wu, W. , 2015, “ Design of a Miniaturized Pneumatic Vibration Isolator With High-Static-Low-Dynamic Stiffness,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 137(4), p. 045001. [CrossRef]
Zheng, Y. , Zhang, X. , Luo, Y. , Yan, B. , and Ma, C. , 2016, “ Design and Experiment of a High-Static–low-Dynamic Stiffness Isolator Using a Negative Stiffness Magnetic Spring,” J. Sound Vib., 360, pp. 31–52. [CrossRef]
Stewart, D. , 1965, “ A Platform With Six Degrees of Freedom,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 180(1), pp. 371–386. [CrossRef]
Fichter, E. F. , 1986, “ A Stewart Platform- Based Manipulator: General Theory and Practical Construction,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 5(2), pp. 157–182. [CrossRef]
Geng, Z. J. , and Haynes, L. S. , 1994, “ Six Degree-of-Freedom Active Vibration Control Using the Stewart Platforms,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2(1), pp. 45–53. [CrossRef]
Wu, Z. , Jing, X. , Sun, B. , and Li, F. , 2016, “ A 6DOF Passive Vibration Isolator Using X-Shape Supporting Structures,” J. Sound Vib., 380, pp. 90–111. [CrossRef]
Zheng, Y. , Li, Q. , Zhang, X. , Luo, Y. , Zhang, Y. , and Xie, S. , 2016, “ Six-Degrees-of-Freedom Quasi-Zero-Rigidity Vibration Isolation System Based on Stewart Platform,” China, Patent Application CN201510395953.
Yonnet, J. P. , 1978, “ Passive Magnetic Bearings With Permanent Magnets,” IEEE Trans. Magn., 14(5), pp. 803–805. [CrossRef]
Zhong, W. , 1998, Ferromagnetic Theory (in Chinese), China Science Press, Beijing.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of the 6DOFs-QZS vibration isolation platform. (a) three-dimensional model, (b) arrangement of connecting points and QZS struts, and (c) QZS strut at the equilibrium position.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Force and (b) stiffness versus displacement relationships of the QZS strut

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Transmissibility of the QZS platform compared with its linear counterpart: (a) TFx, (b) TFy, (c) TFz, (d) TMx, (e) TMy, and (f) TMz. Solid lines and dashed lines denote theoretical results of the QZS system (QZS-T) and its linear counterpart, respectively, and hollow cycles represent numerical results of the QZS system (QZS-N).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Effects of damping on transmissibility (a) TFz and (b) TMz, when η=1%. Dashed lines denote unstable solutions in the case of ζ=0.01.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effects of excitation amplitude on transmissibility (a) TFx and (b) TMx, when ζ=0.01. Dashed lines denote unstable solutions.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In