Technical Brief

Multilayered Inclusions in Locally Resonant Metamaterials: Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Modeling

[+] Author and Article Information
Anastasiia O. Krushynska

Department of Physics,
University of Turin,
Turin 10125, Italy
e-mail: akrushynska@gmail.com

Marco Miniaci

Laboratoire Ondes et Milieux Complexes,
University of Le Havre,
Le Havre 76600, France
e-mail: marco.miniaci@gmail.com

Varvara G. Kouznetsova

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Eindhoven University of Technology,
Eindhoven 5600MB, The Netherlands
e-mail: v.g.kouznetsova@tue.nl

Marc G. D. Geers

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Eindhoven University of Technology,
Eindhoven 5600MB, The Netherlands
e-mail: m.g.d.geers@tue.nl

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Technical Committee on Vibration and Sound of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received April 27, 2016; final manuscript received November 10, 2016; published online February 3, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Mahmoud Hussein.

J. Vib. Acoust 139(2), 024501 (Feb 03, 2017) (4 pages) Paper No: VIB-16-1239; doi: 10.1115/1.4035307 History: Received April 27, 2016; Revised November 10, 2016

Locally resonant metamaterials (LRMs) controlling low-frequency waves due to resonant scattering are usually characterized by narrow band gaps (BGs) and a poor wave filtering performance. To remedy this shortcoming, multiresonant metamaterial structures with closely located BGs have been proposed and widely studied. However, the analysis is generally limited to two-dimensional (2D) structures neglecting the finite height of any real resonator. The aim of this paper is the comparison of the wave dispersion for two- and three-dimensional (3D) metamaterial models and evaluation of the applicability ranges of 2D results. Numerical study reveals that dual-resonant structures with cylindrical inclusions possess only a single (compared to two in the 2D case) BG for certain height-to-width ratios. In contrast, the wave dispersion in metamaterials with multiple spherical resonators can be accurately evaluated using a 2D approximation, enabling a significant simplification of resource-consuming 3D models.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the 3D unit cell and its cross section for an LRM with multilayered cylindrical inclusions (the geometrical parameters are given in millimeters)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Band diagrams for 2D out-of-plane (a) and in-plane (b) modes in the LRM with infinite value of h. Vibration patterns of the 2D localized out-of-plane—(c) f = 110 Hz and (d) f = 212 Hz—and in-plane modes—(e) f = 185 Hz and (f)f = 425 Hz.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Band diagram of a 3D slab of height h = 0.2a. (b)–(e) Vibration patterns of the localized modes for the slab with height h = 0.2a. (f) Complete band gap frequencies as a function of the unit cell height-to-width ratio h/a. (b) f = 105 Hz, (c)f = 185 Hz, (d) f = 206 Hz, and (e) f = 259 Hz.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic representation of a 3D unit cell for an LRM with multilayered spherical inclusions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Band diagrams for the metamaterial shown in Fig. 4 with (a) periodic and (b) traction-free boundary conditions at the faces normal to the z axis, respectively




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In