0
Technical Brief

Dynamic Model for Fatigue Evolution in a Cracked Beam Subjected to Irregular Loading

[+] Author and Article Information
Son Hai Nguyen

Nonlinear Dynamics Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical, Industrial and
Systems Engineering,
University of Rhode Island,
Kingston, RI 02881
e-mail: haisonbk@gmail.com

David Chelidze

Professor
Nonlinear Dynamics Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical, Industrial
and Systems Engineering,
University of Rhode Island,
Kingston, RI 02881
e-mail: chelidze@uri.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Technical Committee on Vibration and Sound of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received March 12, 2016; final manuscript received October 10, 2016; published online November 29, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Miao Yu.

J. Vib. Acoust 139(1), 014502 (Nov 29, 2016) (6 pages) Paper No: VIB-16-1115; doi: 10.1115/1.4035112 History: Received March 12, 2016; Revised October 10, 2016

The coupling of vibration and fatigue crack growth in a simply supported uniform Euler–Bernoulli beam containing a single-edge crack is analyzed. The fatigue crack length is treated as a generalized coordinate in a model for the mechanical system. This coupled model accounts for the interaction between the beam oscillations and the crack propagation dynamics. Nonlinear characteristics of the beam motion are introduced as loading parameters to the fatigue model to match experimentally observed failure dynamics. The method of averaging is utilized both as an analytical and numerical tool to: (1) show that, for cyclic loading, our fatigue model reduces to the Paris' law and (2) compare the predicted fatigue damage accumulation with the experimental data for chaotic and random loadings. A utility of the fatigue model is demonstrated in estimating fatigue life under irregular loadings.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Fatemi, A. , and Yang, L. , 1998, “ Cumulative Fatigue Damage and Life Prediction Theories: A Survey of the State of the Art for Homogeneous Materials,” Int. J. Fatigue, 20(1), pp. 9–34. [CrossRef]
Carpinteri, A. , ed., 1994, Handbook of Fatigue Crack Propagation in Metallic Structures, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Miner, M. , 1945, “ Cumulative Damage in Fatigue,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 12(3), pp. A159–A164.
Palmgren, A. , 1924, “ Die lebensdauer von kugellagern,” Verfahrenstechnik, 68(14), pp. 339–341.
Macha, E. , Lagoda, T. , Nieslony, A. , and Kardas, D. , 2006, “ Fatigue Life Under Variable-Amplitude Loading According to the Cycle-Counting and Spectral Methods,” Mater. Sci., 42(3), pp. 416–425. [CrossRef]
Ewalds, H. L. , and Wanhill, R. J. H. , 1984, Fracture Mechanics, Edward Arnold, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Dimarogonas, A. D. , 1996, “ Vibration of Cracked Structures: A State of the Art Review,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 55(5), pp. 831–857. [CrossRef]
Giry, C. , Dufour, F. , and Mazars, J. , 2011, “ Stress-Based Nonlocal Damage Model,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 48(2526), pp. 3431–3443. [CrossRef]
Voyiadjis, G. Z. , and Mozaffari, N. , 2013, “ Nonlocal Damage Model Using the Phase Field Method: Theory and Applications,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 50(2021), pp. 3136–3151. [CrossRef]
Cusumano, J. , and Li, Q. , 2010, “ Coupled Field Damage Dynamics Via Hamilton's Principle,” ASME Paper No. DETC2010-29078.
Cusumano, J. , Roy, A. , and Li, Q. , 2015, “ Damage Dynamics, Rate Laws, and Failure Statistics Via Hamilton's Principle,” Meccanica, 50(1), pp. 77–98. [CrossRef]
Skorupa, M. , 1999, “ Load Interaction Effects During Fatigue Crack Growth Under Variable Amplitude Loading—A Literature Review—Part I: Empirical Trends,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 21(8), pp. 987–1006. [CrossRef]
Skorupa, M. , 1999, “ Load Interaction Effects During Fatigue Crack Growth Under Variable Amplitude Loading—A Literature Review—Part II: Qualitative Interpretations,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 22(10), pp. 905–926. [CrossRef]
Kantz, H. , and Schreiber, T. , 2004, Nonlinear Time Series Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Abarbanel, H. , 1996, Analysis of Observed Chaotic Data, Springer, New York.
Christides, S. , and Barr, A. D. S. , 1984, “ One-Dimensional Theory of Cracked Bernoulli-Euler Beams,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 26(11), pp. 639–648. [CrossRef]
Shen, M. , and Pierre, C. , 1990, “ Natural Modes of Bernoulli–Euler Beams With Symmetric Cracks,” J. Sound Vib., 138(1), pp. 115–134. [CrossRef]
Nguyen, S. H. , Falco, M. , Liu, M. , and Chelidze, D. , 2014, “ Different Fatigue Dynamics Under Statistically and Spectrally Similar Deterministic and Stochastic Excitations,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 81(4), p. 041004. [CrossRef]
Sanders, J. A. , Verhulst, F. , and Murdock, J. , 2007, Averaging Methods in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems, Springer, New York.
Suresh, S. , 1998, Fatigue of Materials, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Falco, M. , Liu, M. , and Chelidze, D. , 2010, “ A New Fatigue Testing Apparatus Model and Parameter Identification,” ASME Paper No. DETC2010-29107.
ASTM, 2008, “ Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Fracture Toughness,” American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, Standard No. ASTM-E1820-08a.
Schreiber, T. , and Schmitz, A. , 1996, “ Improved Surrogate Data for Nonlinearity Tests,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 77(4), pp. 635–638. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Meirovitch, L. , 1996, Principles and Techniques of Vibrations, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Anderson, T. L. , 1995, Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Tada, H. , Paris, P. C. , and Irwin, G. R. , 2000, The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, 3rd ed., American Society of Mechanical Engineers Press, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Geometry of a simply supported beam with an edge crack

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of the experimental apparatus

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Model of the specimen. The machined notch is at the center.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Measurements of fatigue crack (a) and beam static deflection (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Beam diagram with applied forces

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of the ACPD signal (solid line) with numerical integration (dashed line)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Exponential curve fitting

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Dependence of Rσ〈wx=L03〉 in time

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In