0
Technical Brief

Layerwise Analyses of Compact and Thin-Walled Beams Made of Viscoelastic Materials

[+] Author and Article Information
Matteo Filippi

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
Politecnico di Torino,
Torino 10129, Italy
e-mail: matteo.filippi@polito.it

Erasmo Carrera

Professor of Aerospace Structures and Aeroelasticity
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
Politecnico di Torino,
Torino 10129, Italy
e-mail: erasmo.carrera@polito.it

Andrea M. Regalli

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
Politecnico di Torino,
Torino 10129, Italy
e-mail: andreamariaregalli@yahoo.it

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Technical Committee on Vibration and Sound of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received January 7, 2016; final manuscript received June 23, 2016; published online July 19, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Mahmoud Hussein.

J. Vib. Acoust 138(6), 064501 (Jul 19, 2016) (9 pages) Paper No: VIB-16-1010; doi: 10.1115/1.4034023 History: Received January 07, 2016; Revised June 23, 2016

This paper evaluates the vibration characteristics of structures with viscoelastic materials. The mechanical properties of viscoelastic layers have been described with the complex modulus approach. The equations of motion are derived using the principle of virtual displacement (PVD), and they are solved through the finite element method (FEM). Higher-order beam elements have been derived with the Carrera Unified Formulation (CUF), which enables one to go beyond the assumptions of the classical one-dimensional (1D) theories. According to the layerwise approach, Lagrange-like polynomial expansions have been adopted to develop the kinematic assumptions. The complex nonlinear dynamic problem has been solved through an iterative technique in order to consider both constant and frequency-dependent material properties. The results have been reported in terms of frequencies and modal loss factors, and they have been compared with available results in the literature and numerical three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) solutions. The proposed beam elements have enabled bending, torsional, shell-like, and coupled mode shapes to be detected.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Zheng, L. , Qiu, Q. , Wan, H. , and Zhang, D. , 2014, “ Damping Analysis of Multilayer Passive Constrained Layer Damping on Cylindrical Shell Using Transfer Function Method,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 136(3), p. 031001. [CrossRef]
Rao, M. D. , 2003, “ Recent Applications of Viscoelastic Damping for Noise Control in Automobiles and Commercial Airplanes,” J. Sound Vib., 262(3), pp. 457–474. [CrossRef]
Rouleau, L. , Deü, J.-F. , Legay, A. , Sigrist, J.-F. , Le Lay, F. , and Marin-Curtoud, P. , 2012, “ A Component Mode Synthesis Approach for Dynamic Analysis of Viscoelastically Damped Structures,” 10th World Congress on Computational Mechanics (WCCM 2012), Sao Paulo, Brazil, July 8–13, Vol. 229, p. 231.
Roylance, D. , 2001, “ Engineering Viscoelasticity,” Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA, Vol. 2139, pp. 1–37.
Slater, J. C. , Belvin, W. K. , and Inman, D. J. , 1993, “ A Survey of Modern Methods for Modeling Frequency Dependent Damping in Finite Element Models,” Proc. SPIE 1923, pp. 1508–1512.
Zhang, S. H. , and Chen, H. L. , 2006, “ A Study on the Damping Characteristics of Laminated Composites With Integral Viscoelastic Layers,” Compos. Struct., 74(1), pp. 63–69. [CrossRef]
Moita, J. , Araújo, A. , Soares, C. M. , and Soares, C. M. , 2013, “ Finite Element Model for Damping Optimization of Viscoelastic Sandwich Structures,” Adv. Eng. Software, 66, pp. 34–39. [CrossRef]
Ferreira, A. , Araújo, A. , Neves, A. , Rodrigues, J. , Carrera, E. , Cinefra, M. , and Soares, C. M. , 2013, “ A Finite Element Model Using a Unified Formulation for the Analysis of Viscoelastic Sandwich Laminates,” Composites, Part B, 45(1), pp. 1258–1264. [CrossRef]
Abdoun, F. , Azrar, L. , Daya, E. , and Potier-Ferry, M. , 2009, “ Forced Harmonic Response of Viscoelastic Structures by an Asymptotic Numerical Method,” Comput. Struct., 87(1), pp. 91–100. [CrossRef]
Bilasse, M. , Daya, E. , and Azrar, L. , 2010, “ Linear and Nonlinear Vibrations Analysis of Viscoelastic Sandwich Beams,” J. Sound Vib., 329(23), pp. 4950–4969. [CrossRef]
Boudaoud, H. , Belouettar, S. , Daya, E. M. , and Potier-Ferry, M. , 2009, “ A Numerical Method for Nonlinear Complex Modes With Application to Active–Passive Damped Sandwich Structures,” Eng. Struct., 31(2), pp. 284–291. [CrossRef]
Kerwin, E. M., Jr. , 1959, “ Damping of Flexural Waves by a Constrained Viscoelastic Layer,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 31(7), pp. 952–962. [CrossRef]
Di Taranto, R. , 1965, “ Theory of Vibratory Bending for Elastic and Viscoelastic Layered Finite-Length Beams,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 32(4), pp. 881–886. [CrossRef]
Mead, D. , and Markus, S. , 1969, “ The Forced Vibration of a Three-Layer Damped Sandwich Beam With Arbitrary Boundary Conditions,” J. Sound Vib., 10(2), pp. 163–175. [CrossRef]
Yan, M.-J. , and Dowell, E. , 1972, “ Governing Equations for Vibrating Constrained-Layer Damping Sandwich Plates and Beams,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 39(4), pp. 1041–1046. [CrossRef]
Rao, D. , 1978, “ Frequency and Loss Factors of Sandwich Beams Under Various Boundary Conditions,” J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 20(5), pp. 271–282. [CrossRef]
Bhimaraddi, A. , 1995, “ Sandwich Beam Theory and the Analysis of Constrained Layer Damping,” J. Sound Vib., 179(4), pp. 591–602. [CrossRef]
Barkanov, E. , Skukis, E. , and Petitjean, B. , 2009, “ Characterisation of Viscoelastic Layers in Sandwich Panels Via an Inverse Technique,” J. Sound Vib., 327(3), pp. 402–412. [CrossRef]
Rikards, R. , Chate, A. , and Barkanov, E. , 1993, “ Finite Element Analysis of Damping the Vibrations of Laminated Composites,” Comput. Struct., 47(6), pp. 1005–1015. [CrossRef]
Koutsawa, Y. , Charpentier, I. , Daya, E. M. , and Cherkaoui, M. , 2008, “ A Generic Approach for the Solution of Nonlinear Residual Equations—Part I: The Diamant Toolbox,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 198(3), pp. 572–577. [CrossRef]
Berthelot, J.-M. , Assarar, M. , Sefrani, Y. , and El Mahi, A. , 2008, “ Damping Analysis of Composite Materials and Structures,” Compos. Struct., 85(3), pp. 189–204. [CrossRef]
Vallala, V. , Ruimi, A. , and Reddy, J. , 2012, “ Nonlinear Viscoelastic Analysis of Orthotropic Beams Using a General Third-Order Theory,” Compos. Struct., 94(12), pp. 3759–3768. [CrossRef]
Suzuki, K. , Kageyama, K. , Kimpara, I. , Hotta, S. , Ozawa, T. , Kabashima, S. , and Ozaki, T. , 2003, “ Vibration and Damping Prediction of Laminates With Constrained Viscoelastic Layers–Numerical Analysis by a Multilayer Higher-Order-Deformable Finite Element and Experimental Observations,” Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., 10(1), pp. 43–75. [CrossRef]
Kosmatka, J. , and Liguore, S. , 1993, “ Review of Methods for Analyzing Constrained-Layer Damped Structures,” J. Aerosp. Eng., 6(3), pp. 268–283. [CrossRef]
Moreira, R. , and Rodrigues, J. D. , 2004, “ Constrained Damping Layer Treatments: Finite Element Modeling,” J. Vib. Control, 10(4), pp. 575–595. [CrossRef]
Vasques, C. , and Rodrigues, J. D. , 2011, Vibration and Structural Acoustics Analysis: Current Research and Related Technologies, Springer Science & Business Media, The Netherlands.
Carrera, E. , Cinefra, M. , Petrolo, M. , and Zappino, E. , 2014, Finite Element Analysis of Structures Through Unified Formulation, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Carrera, E. , Filippi, M. , Mahato, P. K. , and Pagani, A. , 2014, “ Advanced Models for Free Vibration Analysis of Laminated Beams With Compact and Thin-Walled Open/Closed Sections,” J. Compos. Mater., 49(7), pp. 2085–2101. [CrossRef]
Carrera, E. , Filippi, M. , Mahato, P. , and Pagani, A. , 2016, “ Accurate Static Response of Single-and Multi-Cell Laminated Box Beams,” Compos. Struct., 136, pp. 372–383. [CrossRef]
Carrera, E. , and Petrolo, M. , 2012, “ Refined Beam Elements With Only Displacement Variables and Plate/Shell Capabilities,” Meccanica, 47(3), pp. 537–556. [CrossRef]
Carrera, E. , and Petrolo, M. , 2012, “ Refined One-Dimensional Formulations for Laminated Structure Analysis,” AIAA J., 50(1), pp. 176–189. [CrossRef]
Carrera, E. , Giunta, G. , and Petrolo, M. , 2011, Beam Structures: Classical and Advanced Theories, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Carrera, E. , and Filippi, M. , 2014, “ Variable Kinematic One-Dimensional Finite Elements for the Analysis of Rotors Made of Composite Materials,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 136(9), p. 092501. [CrossRef]
Arikoglu, A. , and Ozkol, I. , 2010, “ Vibration Analysis of Composite Sandwich Beams With Viscoelastic Core by Using Differential Transform Method,” Compos. Struct., 92(12), pp. 3031–3039. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Coordinates mapping between coordinate systems

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Dimensions of rectangular cross section beam

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Root loci related to the first six torsional mode shapes of the asymmetric structure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Frequencies (a) and modal loss factors and (b) related to the first torsional mode shape of the orthotropic beam [θ/core/−θ]. ηc = 0.6

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Frequencies and modal loss factors related to the first mode shapes of the orthotropic beam [θ/core/θ]. ηc = 1.5. “—”: 3D FE, “– – –”: 3L16 (a) bending frequencies, (b) bending loss factors, (c) torsional frequencies, and (d) torsional loss factors.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Dimensions (mm) and numerical models for the I-beam damper: (a) LE9 model (5475DOFs) and (b) solid model (56,400DOFs)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Mode shapes, frequencies, and modal loss factors of the cantilevered I-beam damper: ηc = 1.5 (a) f = 90.774 Hz, η = 0.0626, f = 90.955 Hz, η = 0.0626, (b) f = 102.643 Hz, η = 0.0242, f = 105.409 Hz, η = 0.0284, (c) f = 391.10 Hz, η = 0.0926, f = 402.815 Hz, η = 0.0903, (d) f = 407.67 Hz, η = 0.0101, f = 408.954 Hz, η = 0.0124, (e) f = 427.01 Hz, η = 0.174, f = 428.394 Hz, η = 0.175, (f) f = 437.722 Hz, η = 0.0124, f = 443.777 Hz, η = 0.0143, (g) f = 480.01 Hz, η = 1.012, f = 419.294 Hz, η = 1.388, (h) f = 554.236 Hz, η = 0.0349, f = 566.047 Hz, η = 0.0354, (i) f = 597.675 Hz, η = 0.802, f = 550.543 Hz, η = 0.971, and (j) f = 68.150 Hz, η = 0.0002, f = 68.341 Hz, η = 0.0002

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In