Research Papers

A Compact Experimentally Validated Model of Magnetorheological Fluids

[+] Author and Article Information
Fei-Hong Xu

Key Laboratory of C&PC Structures of the Ministry of Education,
Southeast University,
Nanjing 210096, China

Zhao-Dong Xu

Key Laboratory of C&PC Structures of the Ministry of Education,
Southeast University,
Nanjing 210096, China
e-mail: xuzhdgyq@seu.edu.cn

Xiang-Cheng Zhang

School of Mechanics and Engineering Science,
Zhengzhou University,
Zhengzhou 450001, China

Ying-Qing Guo

Mechanical and Electronic Engineering School,
Nanjing Forestry University,
Nanjing 210037, China

Yong Lu

School of Engineering,
The University of Edinburgh,
Edinburgh EH9 3DW, UK

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Technical Committee on Vibration and Sound of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received July 17, 2015; final manuscript received September 17, 2015; published online November 19, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Mohammed Daqaq.

J. Vib. Acoust 138(1), 011017 (Nov 19, 2015) (7 pages) Paper No: VIB-15-1269; doi: 10.1115/1.4031757 History: Received July 17, 2015; Revised September 17, 2015

Magnetorheological (MR) dampers are one of the most promising devices for mitigation of vibration of engineering structures due to earthquakes and wind excitation. In this paper, a compact two-column model of an MR fluid is proposed in order to formulate a general solution for calculation of the yield shear stress of an MR fluid. The magnetic induction intensity in the damping gap, which is the key parameter of the compact two-column model, is determined through simulation of the magnetic circuit of the MR damper. To verify the effectiveness and significance of the proposed model, damping forces calculated based on the proposed model and the traditional single-chain model are compared with the experimental data. Results show that the proposed compact two-column model is more accurate and that it can describe the rheological properties of the MR fluids very well.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Ashour, O. , Rogers, C. A. , and Kordonsky, W. , 1996, “ Magnetorheological Fluids: Materials, Characterization, and Devices,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 7(2), pp. 123–130. [CrossRef]
Zipser, L. , Richter, L. , and Lange, U. , 2001, “ Magnetorheologic Fluids for Actuators,” Sens. Actuators A, 92(1), pp. 318–325. [CrossRef]
Yao, G. , Yap, F. , Chen, G. , Li, W. , and Yeo, S. , 2002, “ MR Damper and Its Application for Semi-Active Control of Vehicle Suspension System,” Mechatronics, 12(7), pp. 963–973. [CrossRef]
Guan, Y. , and Huang, W. , 2002, “ The Application of MR Damper in the Semi-Active Vibration Control for Offshore Platform,” China Offshore Platform, 17(3), pp. 25–28.
Xu, Z. D. , Shen, Y. P. , and Guo, Y. Q. , 2003, “ Semi-Active Control of Structures Incorporated With Magnetorheological Dampers Using Neural Networks,” Smart Mater. Struct., 12(1), pp. 80–87. [CrossRef]
Xu, Z. D. , Sha, L. F. , Zhang, X. C. , and Ye, H. H. , 2013, “ Design, Performance Test and Analysis on Magnetorheological Damper for Earthquake Mitigation,” Struct. Control Health Monit., 20(6), pp. 956–970. [CrossRef]
Wereley, N. M. , and Pang, L. , 1998, “ Nondimensional Analysis of Semi-Active Electrorheological and Magnetorheological Dampers Using Approximate Parallel Plate Models,” Smart Mater. Struct., 7(5), pp. 732–743. [CrossRef]
Wang, X. , and Gordaninejad, F. , 1999, “ Flow Analysis of Field-Controllable, Electro- and Magneto-Rheological Fluids Using Herschel–Bulkley Model,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 10(8), pp. 601–608. [CrossRef]
Wang, X. , and Gordaninejad, F. , 2007, “ Flow Analysis and Modeling of Field-Controllable, Electro- and Magneto-Rheological Fluid Dampers,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 74(1), pp. 13–22. [CrossRef]
Yang, G. , Spencer, B., Jr. , Carlson, J. , and Sain, M. , 2002, “ Large-Scale MR Fluid Dampers: Modeling and Dynamic Performance Considerations,” Eng. Struct., 24(3), pp. 309–323. [CrossRef]
Dyke, S. , Spencer, B., Jr. , Sain, M. , and Carlson, J. , 1996, “ Modeling and Control of Magnetorheological Dampers for Seismic Response Reduction,” Smart Mater. Struct., 5(5), pp. 565–575. [CrossRef]
Spencer, B. , Dyke, S. , Sain, M. , and Carlson, J. , 1997, “ Phenomenological Model for Magnetorheological Dampers,” J. Eng. Mech., 123(3), pp. 230–238. [CrossRef]
Dominguez, A. , Sedaghati, R. , and Stiharu, I. , 2006, “ A New Dynamic Hysteresis Model for Magnetorheological Dampers,” Smart Mater. Struct., 15(5), pp. 1179–1189. [CrossRef]
Xu, Z. D. , Jia, D. H. , and Zhang, X. C. , 2012, “ Performance Tests and Mathematical Model Considering Magnetic Saturation for Magnetorheological Damper,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 23(12), pp. 1331–1349. [CrossRef]
Bossis, G. , and Lemaire, E. , 1991, “ Yield Stresses in Magnetic Suspensions,” J. Rheol., 35(7), pp. 1345–1354. [CrossRef]
Shkel, Y. , and Klingenberg, D. , 2001, “ Magnetorheology and Magnetostriction of Isolated Chains of Nonlinear Magnetizable Spheres,” J. Rheol., 45(2), pp. 351–368. [CrossRef]
Peng, X. , and Li, H. , 2007, “ Analysis of the Magnetomechanical Behavior of MRFs Based on Micromechanics Incorporating a Statistical Approach,” Smart Mater. Struct., 16(6), pp. 2477–2485. [CrossRef]
Yi, C. , Peng, X. , and Zhao, C. , 2010, “ A Magnetic-Dipoles-Based Micro–Macro Constitutive Model for MRFs Subjected to Shear Deformation,” Rheol. Acta, 49(8), pp. 815–825. [CrossRef]
Guo, C. W. , Chen, F. , Meng, Q. R. , and Dong, Z. X. , 2014, “ Yield Shear Stress Model of Magnetorheological Fluids Based on Exponential Distribution,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 360(9), pp. 174–177. [CrossRef]
Li, H. , Peng, X. , and Chen, W. , 2005, “ Simulation of the Chain-Formulation Process in Magnetic Fields,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 16(7–8), pp. 653–658. [CrossRef]
Yi, C. J. , Peng, X. H. , and Li, H. T. , 2008, “ Numerical Simulation of Dynamics of Ferromagnetic Particles in MRFS Under Static Magnetic Fields,” Advances in Heterogeneous Material Mechanics 2008, pp. 1506–1509.
Phillips, R. W. , 1969, Engineering Applications of Fluids With a Variable Yield Stress, University of California, Berkeley, CA.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Shear stress with varying angles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Yield shear stress with varying magnetic induction intensities

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Contour of the magnetic induction intensity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Magnetic induction intensities of the damping gaps under different currents

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Meshing of the model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Schematic of the MR damper

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Shear deformation of the dipoles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Magnetic particle distribution in the carrier liquid: (a) with no magnetic field and (b) with magnetic field

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Performance test of MR damper

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Hysteresis curves under different currents (a), amplitudes (b), and frequencies (c)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Damping results comparison between experiment and the two models




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In