0
Research Papers

Analytical Solution of Biot's Equations Based on Potential Functions Method

[+] Author and Article Information
Abolfazl Hasani Baferani

Acoustics Research Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Amirkabir University of Technology
(Tehran Polytechnic),
No. 424, Hafez Avenue,
Tehran 15914, Iran
e-mail: a_hasani_baferani@aut.ac.ir

Abdolreza Ohadi

Associate Professor
Acoustics Research Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Amirkabir University of Technology
(Tehran Polytechnic),
No. 424, Hafez Avenue,
Tehran 15914, Iran
e-mail: a_r_ohadi@aut.ac.ir

Contributed by the Noise Control and Acoustics Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received June 16, 2014; final manuscript received April 21, 2015; published online July 10, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Liang-Wu Cai.

J. Vib. Acoust 137(5), 051016 (Jul 10, 2015) (12 pages) Paper No: VIB-14-1215; doi: 10.1115/1.4030715 History: Received June 16, 2014

In this paper, a new analytical solution for Biot's equations is presented based on potential functions method. The primary coupled Biot's equations have been considered based on fluid and solid displacements in three-dimensional (3D) space. By defining some potential functions, the governing equations have been improved to a simpler form. Then the coupled Biot's equations have been replaced with four-decoupled equations, by doing some mathematical manipulations. For a case study, it is assumed that the incident wave is in xy-plane and for specific boundary conditions; the partial differential equations are converted to ordinary differential equations and solved analytically. Then two foams with different properties have been considered, and acoustical properties of these foams due to the new developed method have been compared with the corresponding results presented by transfer-matrix method. Good agreement between results verifies the new presented solution. Based on the potential function method, not only the acoustical properties of porous materials are calculated, but also the analytical values of all basic field variables, such as pressure, fluid, and solid displacements, are obtained for all points in the porous media. Furthermore, fundamental features, such as damped and undamped natural frequencies, and damping coefficient of porous materials are calculated by considering presented results. The obtained results show that maximum values of field variables, such as pressure, fluid, and solid displacements, happen at the damped natural frequencies of the porous media, as expected. By increasing material thickness, the effect of damping of porous material on damped natural frequency decreases. Damping decreases the first natural frequency of the foam up to 8.5%.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Incident plane wave exciting porous media

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Variation of absorption coefficient of foam 1 versus excitation frequency in the incident direction for four material thicknesses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Variation of amplitude of pressure versus excitation frequency at several locations along the thickness for different foam thicknesses: (a) h = 0.05 m, (b) h = 0.1 m, (c) h = 0.15 m, and (d) h = 0.2 m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Variation of amplitude of fluid displacement versus excitation frequency at several locations along the thickness for different foam thicknesses: (a) h = 0.05 m, (b) h = 0.1 m, (c) h = 0.15 m, and (d) h = 0.2 m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Variation of amplitude of solid displacement versus excitation frequency at several locations along the thickness for different foam thicknesses: (a) h = 0.05 m, (b) h = 0.1 m, (c) h = 0.15 m, and (d) h = 0.2 m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

3D representation for variation of pressure amplitude versus frequency and position in thickness direction for three different foam thicknesses: (a) h = 0.05 m, (b) h = 0.1 m, and (c) h = 0.15 m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Variation of absorption coefficient versus frequency for foam 1 (h=0.1 m)—comparison between potential function and transfer-matrix methods

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Variation of absorption coefficient versus frequency for foam 2 (h=0.1 m)—comparison between potential function and transfer-matrix methods

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Variation of amplitude of pressure in thickness direction for different frequencies in normal incident (h=0.1m)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In