0
Research Papers

Passive/Active Autoparametric Cantilever Beam Absorber With Piezoelectric Actuator for a Two-Story Building-Like Structure

[+] Author and Article Information
Gerardo Silva-Navarro

Mechatronics Section,
Department of Electrical Engineering,
Centro de Investigacion y de Estudios
Avanzados del I.P.N.,
A.P. 14-740,
Mexico, D.F. C.P. 07360, Mexico
e-mail: gsilva@cinvestav.mx

Hugo F. Abundis-Fong

Mechatronics Section,
Department of Electrical Engineering,
Centro de Investigacion y de Estudios
Avanzados del I.P.N.,
A.P. 14-740,
Mexico, D.F. C.P. 07360, Mexico
e-mail: habundis@cinvestav.mx

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Technical Committee on Vibration and Sound of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received April 1, 2014; final manuscript received September 22, 2014; published online November 12, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Eugenio Dragoni.

J. Vib. Acoust 137(1), 011017 (Feb 01, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: VIB-14-1118; doi: 10.1115/1.4028711 History: Received April 01, 2014; Revised September 22, 2014; Online November 12, 2014

This work deals with the design and experimental evaluation of a passive/active cantilever beam autoparametric vibration absorber mounted on a two-story building-like structure (primary system), with two rigid floors connected by flexible columns. The autoparametric vibration absorber consists of a cantilever beam with a piezoelectric patch actuator, cemented to its base, mounted on the top of the structure and actively controlled through an acquisition system. The overall system is then a coupled nonlinear oscillator subjected to sinusoidal excitation in the neighborhood of its external and internal resonances. The addition of the piezoelectric patch actuator to the cantilever beam absorber makes active the passive vibration absorber, thus enabling the possibility to control its equivalent stiffness and damping and, as a consequence, the implementation of an active vibration control scheme able to preserve, as possible, the autoparametric interaction as well as to compensate varying excitation frequencies and parametric uncertainty.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Spencer, B. F., Jr., and Nagarajaiah, S., 2003, “State of the Art of Structural Control,” J. Struct. Eng., 129(7), pp. 845–856. [CrossRef]
Battaini, M., Casciati, F., and Faravelli, L., 1998, “Fuzzy Control of Structural Vibration. An Active Mass System Driven by a Fuzzy Controller,” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 27(11), pp. 1267–1276. [CrossRef]
Sun, J. Q., Jolly, M. R., and Norris, M. A., 1995, “Passive, Adaptive and Active Tuned Vibration Absorbers—A Survey,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 117(B), pp. 234–242. [CrossRef]
Korenev, B. G., and Reznikov, L. M., 1993, Dynamic Vibration Absorber: Theory and Technical Applications, Wiley, London, UK.
Ibrahim, R. A., and Heo, H., 1986, “Autoparametric Vibration of Coupled Beams Under Random Support Motion,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 108(4), pp. 421–426. [CrossRef]
Dahlberg, T., 1989, “On Optimal Use of the Mass of a Dynamic Vibration Absorber,” J. Sound Vib., 132(3), pp. 518–522. [CrossRef]
Preumont, A., 2006, Mechatronics: Dynamics of Electromechanical and Piezoelectric Systems, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Song, G., Sethi, V., and Li, H. N., 2006, “Vibration Control of Civil Structures Using Piezoceramic Smart Materials: A Review,” Eng. Struct., 28(11), pp. 1513–1524. [CrossRef]
Haxton, R. S., and Barr, A. D. S., 1972, “The Autoparametric Vibration Absorber,” J. Eng. Ind., 94(1), pp. 119–124. [CrossRef]
Cartmell, M. P., 1990, Introduction to Linear, Parametric and Nonlinear Vibrations, Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
Tondl, A., Ruijgrok, T., Verhulst, F., and Nabergoj, R., 2000, Autoparametric Resonance in Mechanical Systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Nayfeh, A. H., and Mook, D. T., 1979, Nonlinear Oscillations, Wiley, New York.
Roberts, J. W., 1980, “Random Excitation of a Vibratory System With Autoparametric Interaction,” J. Sound Vib., 69(1), pp. 101–116. [CrossRef]
Cuvalci, O., and Ertas, A., 1996, “Pendulum as Vibration Absorber for Flexible Structures: Experiments and Theory,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 118(4), pp. 558–566. [CrossRef]
Cuvalci, O., Ertas, A., Ekwaro-Osire, S., and Cicek, I., 2002, “Non-Linear Vibration Absorber for a System Under Sinusoidal and Random Excitation: Experiments,” J. Sound Vib., 249(4), pp. 701–718. [CrossRef]
Vazquez-Gonzalez, B., and Silva-Navarro, G., 2008, “Evaluation of the Autoparametric Pendulum Vibration Absorber for a Duffing System,” Shock Vib., 15(3–4), pp. 355–368. [CrossRef]
Cartmell, M. P., 1990, “The Equations of Motion for a Parametrically Excited Cantilever Beam,” J. Sound Vib., 143(3), pp. 395–406. [CrossRef]
Silva-Navarro, G., Macias-Cundapi, L., and Vazquez-Gonzalez, B., 2010, “Design of a Passive/Active Autoparametric Pendulum Absorber for Damped Duffing Systems,” New Trends in Electrical Engineering, Automatic Control, Computing and Communication Science, C. A.Coello, A.Pozniak, J. A.Moreno, and V.Azhmyakov, eds., Logos-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 159–175.
Abundis-Fong, H. F., Silva-Navarro, G., and Vazquez-Gonzalez, B., 2013, “Design of a Passive/Active Autoparametric Cantilever Beam Absorber With PZT Actuator for a Building-Like Structure,” ASME Paper No. SMASIS2013-3230. [CrossRef]
Chopra, A. K., 2001, Dynamics of Structures, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Forehand, D. I. M., and Cartmell, M. P., 2001, “On the Derivation of the Equations of Motion for a Parametrically Excited Cantilever Beam,” J. Sound Vib., 245(1), pp. 165–177. [CrossRef]
Anderson, T. J., Nayfeh, A. H., and Balachandran, B., 1996, “Experimental Verification of the Importance of the Nonlinear Curvature in the Response of a Cantilever Beam,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 118(1), pp. 21–27. [CrossRef]
Gus’kov, A. M., Panovko, G. Ya., and Bin, C. V., 2008, “Analysis of the Dynamics of a Pendulum Vibration Absorber,” J. Mach. Manuf. Reliab., 37(4), pp. 321–329. [CrossRef]
Yabuno, H., Endo, Y., and Aoshima, N., 1999, “Stabilization of 1/3-Order Subharmonic Resonance Using an Autoparametric Vibration Absorber,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 121(3), pp. 309–315. [CrossRef]
Yabuno, H., Murakami, T., Kawazoe, J., and Aoshima, N., 2004, “Suppression of Parametric Resonance in Cantilever Beam With a Pendulum (Effect of Static Friction at the Supporting Point of the Pendulum),” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 126(1), pp. 149–162. [CrossRef]
Craig, R. K., and Kurdila, A. J., 2006, Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Domaneschi, M., 2012, “Simulation of Controlled Hysteresis by the Semi-Active Bouc-Wen Model,” Comput. Struct., 106–107, pp. 245–257. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic diagrams: (a) building-like structure with cantilever beam vibration absorber and (b) free-body diagrams of floors

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Experimental frequency response of the building-like structure without passive autoparametric coupling and without active control (i.e., u  ≡  0)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Control force u, force F, and displacement xb at the base when there is a frequency change (ερ1 = −0.5 rad/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Dynamic response of the system with passive/active absorber when there is a frequency change (ερ1 = +0.5 rad/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Control force u, force F, and displacement xb at the base when there is a frequency change (ερ1 = +0.5 rad/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Experimental frequency response of the autoparametric passive cantilever beam absorber without active control (i.e., u  ≡  0)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Dynamic response of the building-like structure without autoparametric interaction and without active control (i.e., u  ≡  0)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Dynamic response of the building-like structure with passive autoparametric interaction and without active control (i.e., u  ≡  0)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Dynamic response of the building-like structure when xb(t)=xb0(sin ω1t+sin ω2t) without passive autoparametric interaction and without active control (i.e., u  ≡  0)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Dynamic response of the building-like structure when xb(t)=xb0(sin ω1t+sin ω2t) with passive autoparametric interaction and without active control (i.e., u  ≡  0)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Parameterized FRF of the primary system in terms of the available PZT actuator stiffness kc ∈ [–5, 5] N/m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Block diagram of the passive/active autoparametric cantilever beam absorber with PZT actuator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Dynamic response of the system with passive/active absorber when there is a frequency change (ερ1 = −0.5 rad/s)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In