0
Technical Brief

Numerical Local Time Stepping Solutions for Transient Statistical Energy Analysis

[+] Author and Article Information
Oriol Guasch

Associate Professor
GTM—Grup de Recerca en Tecnologies Mèdia,
Department of Engineering,
La Salle, Universitat Ramon Llull,
C/Quatre Camins 2,
Barcelona, Catalonia 08022, Spain
e-mail: oguasch@salleurl.edu

Carlos García

INNOVATION—Test and Validation,
Alstom Wind S.L.U.,
Barcelona, Catalonia 08005, Spain
e-mail: carlos.garcia-martinez@power.alstom.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Noise Control and Acoustics Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received February 2, 2014; final manuscript received August 17, 2014; published online September 19, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Lonny Thompson.

J. Vib. Acoust 136(6), 064502 (Sep 19, 2014) (7 pages) Paper No: VIB-14-1036; doi: 10.1115/1.4028454 History: Received February 02, 2014; Revised August 17, 2014

Subsystem energies evolve in transient statistical energy analysis (TSEA) according to a linear system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs), which is usually numerically solved by means of the forward Euler finite difference scheme. Stability requirements pose limits on the maximum time step size to be used. However, it has been recently pointed out that one should also consider a minimum time step limit, if time independent loss factors are to be assumed. This limit is based on the subsystem internal time scales, which rely on their characteristic mean free paths and group velocities. In some cases, these maximum and minimum limits become incompatible, leading to a blow up of the forward Euler solution. It is proposed to partially mitigate this problem by resorting to a local time-stepping finite difference strategy. Subsystems are grouped into sets characterized by different time step sizes and evolve according to them.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Manning, J. E., and Lee, K., 1968, “Predicting Mechanical Shock Transmission,” Shock Vib. Bull., 37(4), pp. 65–70, available at: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/667229.pdf.
Lai, M. L., and Soom, A., 1990, “Predicition of Transient Vibration Envelopes Using Statistical Energy Analysis Techniques,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 112(1), pp. 127–137. [CrossRef]
Lai, M. L., and Soom, A., 1990, “Statistical Energy Analysis for the Time-Integrated Transient Response of Vibrating Systems,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 112(2), pp. 206–213. [CrossRef]
Robinson, M., and Hopkins, C., 2011, “Transient Statistical Energy Analysis: A Two-Subsystem Model to Assess the Validity of Using Steady-State Coupling Loss Factors for Plate Radiation,” International Congress on Sound and Vibration (ICSV18), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, July 10–14.
Pinnington, R. J., and Lednik, D., 1996, “Transient Statistical Energy Analysis of an Impulsively Excited Two Oscillator System,” J. Sound Vib., 189(2), pp. 240–264. [CrossRef]
Pinnington, R. J., and Lednik, D., 1996, “Transient Energy Flow Between Two Coupled Beams,” J. Sound Vib., 189(2), pp. 265–287. [CrossRef]
Nefske, D. J., and Sung, S. H., 1989, “Power Flow Finite Element Analysis of Dynamic Systems: Basic Theory and Application to Beams,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust. Stress Reliab. Des., 111(1), pp. 94–100. [CrossRef]
Ichchou, M. N., Le Bot, A., and Jezequel, L., 2001, “A Transient Local Energy Approach as an Alternative to Transient SEA: Wave and Telegraph Equations,” J. Sound Vib., 246(5), pp. 829–840. [CrossRef]
Sui, F. S., Ichchou, M. N., and Jezequel, L., 2002, “Prediction of Vibroacoustics Energy Using a Discretized Transient Local Energy Approach and Comparison With TSEA,” J. Sound Vib., 251(1), pp. 163–180. [CrossRef]
Le Bot, A., 2002, “Energy Transfer for High Frequencies in Built Up Structures,” J. Sound Vib., 250(2), pp. 247–275. [CrossRef]
Lyon, R., and DeJong, R., 1998, Theory and Application of Statistical Energy Analysis, 2nd ed., RH Lyon Corp, Cambridge, MA.
Kling, C., and Scholl, W., 2011, “Transient SEA Studies on the Damping of Coupled Building Elements,” Acta Acust. Acust., 97(2), pp. 266–277. [CrossRef]
Hopkins, C., and Robinson, M., 2011, “Using Transient Statistical Energy Analysis to Assess Errors in the Total Loss Factor Determined From Measured Structural Reverberation Times in Building Acoustics,” Inter-Noise 2011, Sound Environment as a Global Issue, Osaka, Japan, Sept. 4–7.
Robinson, M., and Hopkins, C., 2011, “Predicting the Effect of Coupled Spaces and Structures on Structural Decay Curves of Building Elements Using Transient Statistical Energy Analysis,” International Congress on Sound and Vibration (ICSV18), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, July 10–14.
Hopkins, C., and Robinson, M., 2012, “Using Transient and Steady-State SEA to Quantify Errors in the Measured Structure-Borne Sound Power Input From Machinery With Coupled Reception Plates,” International Congress on Sound and Vibration (ICSV19), Vilnius, Lithuania, July 8–12.
Hopkins, C., and Robinson, M., 2013, “On the Evaluation of Decay Curves to Determine Structural Reverberation Times for Building Elements,” Acta Acust. Acust., 99(2), pp. 226–244. [CrossRef]
Robinson, M., and Hopkins, C., 2014, “Prediction of Maximum Time-Weighted Sound and Vibration Levels Using Transient Statistical Energy Analysis. Part 1: Theory and Numerical Implementation,” Acta Acust. Acust., 100(1), pp. 46–56. [CrossRef]
Robinson, M., and Hopkins, C., 2014, “Prediction of Maximum Time-Weighted Sound and Vibration Levels Using Transient Statistical Energy Analysis. Part 2: Experimental Validation,” Acta Acust. Acust., 100(1), pp. 57–66. [CrossRef]
Robinson, M., and Hopkins, C., 2010, “Prediction of Maximum Sound Pressure and Vibration Levels in Heavyweight Building Structures Using Transient Statistical Energy,” Inter-Noise 2010, Noise and Sustainability, Lisbon, Portugal, June 13–16, pp. 1242–1252.
Piperno, S., 2006, “Symplectic Local Time-Stepping in Non-Dissipative DGTD Methods Applied to Wave Propagation Problems,” ESAIM-Math. Model. Numer., 40(5), pp. 815–841. [CrossRef]
Aarseth, S. J., 2003, Gravitational N-Body Simulations: Tools and Algorithms, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Díaz, J., and Grote, M. J., 2009, “Energy Conserving Explicit Local Time Stepping for Second-Order Wave Equations,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 31(3), pp. 1985–2014. [CrossRef]
Logg, A., 2003, “Multi-Adaptive Galerkin Methods for ODEs I,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 24(6), pp. 1879–1902. [CrossRef]
Logg, A., 2003, “Multi-Adaptive Galerkin Methods for ODEs II: Implementation and Applications,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 25(4), pp. 1119–1141. [CrossRef]
Eriksson, K., Johnson, C., and Logg, A., 2003, “Explicit Time-Stepping for Stiff ODES,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 25(4), pp. 1142–1157. [CrossRef]
Hardy, D. J., Okunbor, D. I., and Skeel, R. D., 1999, “Symplectic Variable Step Size Integration for N-Body Problems,” Appl. Numer. Math., 29(1), pp. 19–30. [CrossRef]
Guasch, O., and García, C., 2013, “Numerical Local Time Stepping Strategies for Transient Statistical Energy Analysis,” International Congress on Sound and Vibration (ICSV20), Bangkok, Thailand, July 7–11.
Magrans, F. X., 1993, “Definition and Calculation of Transmission Paths Within a SEA Framework,” J. Sound Vib., 165(2), pp. 277–283. [CrossRef]
Guasch, O., and Cortés, L., 2009, “Graph Theory Applied to Noise and Vibration Control in Statistical Energy Analysis Models,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 125(6), pp. 3657–3672. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Guasch, O., and Aragonès, A., 2011, “Finding the Dominant Energy Transmission Paths in Statistical Energy Analysis,” J. Sound Vib., 330(10), pp. 2325–2338. [CrossRef]
Craik, R. J. M., 1996, Sound Transmission Trough Buildings Using Statistical Energy Analysis, Gower, London, UK.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Local time-stepping algorithm strategies

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Energy time evolution for the left cavity in Fig. 2. — local time-stepping, … exact solution, - - forward Euler finite differences. (a) 250 Hz, (b) 500 Hz, (c) 1000 Hz, (d) 2000 Hz, (e) 4000 Hz, and (f) 8000 Hz.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Energy time evolution for the wall X221 in Fig. 2. local time-stepping, … exact solution, - - forward Euler finite differences. (a) 250 Hz, (b) 500 Hz, (c) 1000 Hz, (d) 2000 Hz, (e) 4000 Hz, and (f) 8000 Hz.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

tstab versus τd/2 for the numerical example. –×tstab, ×τd/2 for the cavity, - -τd/2 for concrete. Gray area indicates admissible values for the time step △t according to Eq. (7).

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In