Research Papers

Nonlinear System Identification and Modeling of a New Fatigue Testing Rig Based on Inertial Forces

[+] Author and Article Information
Michael Falco, Ming Liu, Son Hai Nguyen

Department of Mechanical,
Industrial and Systems Engineering,
University of Rhode Island,
Kingston, RI 02881

David Chelidze

Department of Mechanical,
Industrial and Systems Engineering,
University of Rhode Island,
Kingston, RI 02881
e-mail: chelidze@egr.uri.edu

R = σminmax, where σmin is the minimum peak stress and σmax is the maximum peak stress.

Currently, break of a specimen is indicated by the saturation of the eddy current sensor which usually happens after a crack reaches its fracture stage.

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Technical Committee on Vibration and Sound of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received April 17, 2013; final manuscript received March 23, 2014; published online April 18, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Jiong Tang.

J. Vib. Acoust 136(4), 041001 (Apr 18, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: VIB-13-1113; doi: 10.1115/1.4027317 History: Received April 17, 2013; Revised March 23, 2014

A novel fatigue testing rig based on inertial forces is introduced. The test rig has capacity to mimic various loading conditions including high frequency loads. The rig design allows reconfigurations to accommodate a range of specimen sizes, and changes in structural elements and instrumentation. It is designed to be used as a platform to study the interaction between fatigue crack propagation and structural dynamics. As the first step to understand this interaction, a numerical model of testing rig is constructed using nonlinear system identification approaches. Some initial testing results also are reported.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the fatigue testing apparatus. (1) Flexible connector, (2) slip table, (3) back cylinder, (4) rail, (5) back mass block, (6) specimen supports, (7) specimen, (8) front mass block, and (9) front cylinder.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Beam diagram with applied forces

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Photograph of the system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Model of a specimen

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

(a) Phase space of the specimen under chaotic loading and (b) ACPD measurement and the specimen oscillations based damage estimate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Crack in the specimen at the end of an experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Frequency response function for different load levels

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

A simplified model for the fatigue testing rig

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Left: distribution of data points and area used to generate RFS; right: generated RFS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Left: slice view of RFS when x·=0; right: slice view of RFS when x = 0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Left: surface generated using parameters from DPE; right: the error between the modeled surface and the generated RFS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison between the measured base acceleration (thin light line) and the simulated base acceleration (thick dark line) for 0.1034 MPa in the cylinders

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Relationship between nonlinearity and vibration amplitude




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In